Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/220,065

Noise Reducing Water Resistant Headpiece

Final Rejection §112
Filed
May 27, 2025
Priority
Oct 10, 2014 — CIP of D775792 +3 more
Examiner
HOEY, ALISSA L
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Deejayzoo LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
44%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 1m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 44% of resolved cases
44%
Career Allowance Rate
458 granted / 1032 resolved
-25.6% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1080
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
73.5%
+33.5% vs TC avg
§102
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
§112
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1032 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment This is in response to amendment received on 05/14/26. Claims 1-20 have been cancelled and claims 21-34 have been newly added. Claims 21-34 are examined herein. Specification The specification is objected to as failing to provide proper antecedent basis for the claimed subject matter. See 37 CFR 1.75(d)(1) and MPEP § 608.01(o). Correction of the following is required: support needs to be provided for the terminology “main section” as provided in new claim 21, support needs to be provided for “the back pocket overhanging the gathered portion of the band and protruding away from the head of the wearer past the gathered portion of the band” as provided in new claim 21, support needs to be provided for “a plurality of back folds extending upward from the gathered portion of the band on an outside of the back pocket” as provided in new claim 21, support for “wherein each of the plurality of back folds on the outside of the back pocket extends upward from a respective different part of the gathered portion” as provided in new claim 22, support for “wherein the plurality of back folds on the outside of the back pocket follow a different trajectory extending from the gathered portion than the front folds follow extending from the flat portion of the head”, and support for “wherein the front folds are visible in an interior of the shower cap” as provided in new claim 34. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 32 and 33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding claim 32, the limitation “wherein the main body section is seamless” was not supported in the originally filed disclosure. The main body has folds, it is unclear how these folds would be formed without seams. Regarding claim 33, the limitation “wherein the flat portion of the band is folded over a lower end of each of the front folds”. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 21-31 and 34 are allowed over the prior art, but objected to as detailed above. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALISSA L HOEY whose telephone number is (571)272-4985. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:00-5:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Clinton T Ostrup can be reached at (571)272-5559. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ALISSA L. HOEY Primary Examiner Art Unit 3732 /ALISSA L HOEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 27, 2025
Application Filed
Nov 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 04, 2026
Response Filed
May 21, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12653250
COAT WITH INTEGRAL DRAG HARNESS
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12656086
MODULAR ARMOR SUPPLEMENT APPARATUS AND SYSTEM WITH SILENT FASTENERS AND ADJUSTABILITY
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12648601
COAT WITH INTEGRAL DRAG HARNESS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12635740
UNITARY GARMENT TO FACILITATE LAVATORY ACCESS
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12538950
Facemasks and Method for Manufacturing the Same
5y 4m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
44%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+31.9%)
3y 3m (~2y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1032 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month