Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/220,253

ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND HANDLE ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 28, 2025
Priority
May 31, 2024 — provisional 63/654,814
Examiner
CHOWDHURY, ROCKSHANA D
Art Unit
2841
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Inventec Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
553 granted / 682 resolved
+13.1% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
714
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
55.4%
+15.4% vs TC avg
§102
36.5%
-3.5% vs TC avg
§112
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 682 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The title of the invention The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Objections Claims 2-3 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claims 2-3 should have “(period)” at the end of the sentence. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yeh et al (US 20220349225 A1) in view of Tseng et al (US 20210404212 A1 and Tseng hereinafter) Regarding Claim 1, Yeh discloses (figs. 1-11) an electronic device, comprising: a rack (30);at least one cage (1) , disposed in the rack; at least one handle assembly (10), comprising: a fixing member (150), disposed on a side of the at least one cage; a movable handle (100), wherein an end of the movable handle is movably disposed on the fixing member; a handheld member (500), disposed on another end of the movable handle; and a latch member (520), disposed on the handheld member, wherein the latch member is engaged with another side (26) of the at least one cage or is disengaged from another side of the at least one cage via the rotation of the handheld member; and at least one host (motherboard or disk, [0022]), removably disposed in the at least one cage. Yeh does not explicitly disclose a handheld member, rotatably disposed on another end of the movable handle. However, Tseng teaches (figs. 1-10) a handheld member (22), rotatably disposed on another end of the movable handle ([0028]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine a rotatable handheld member of Tseng to device of Yeh in order to improve the locking stability of the handle ([Tseng, [0005]) Regarding Claim 2, Yeh/Tseng discloses the electronic device according to claim 1. Yeh further teaches wherein the at least one handle assembly further comprises a rotatable member (200), the rotatable member is rotatably disposed on the fixing member, and the movable handle is rotatably disposed on the fixing member via the rotatable member (figs. 4-5). Regarding Claim 3, Yeh/Tseng discloses the electronic device according to claim 2. Yeh further teaches wherein the rotatable member comprises an assembling portion (210) and a pivoting portion (130), the pivoting portion is connected to the assembling portion, the movable handle is rotatably disposed on the assembling portion, and the pivoting portion is rotatably disposed on the fixing member (figs. 3-5). Regarding Claim 7, Yeh discloses (figs. 1-11) a handle assembly, configured to be disposed on at least one cage (1), comprising: a fixing member (150), configured be disposed on a side of the at least one cage; a movable handle (100), wherein an end of the movable handle is movably disposed on the fixing member; a handheld member (500), disposed on another end of the movable handle; and a latch member (520), disposed on the handheld member, wherein the latch member is configured to be engaged with another side of the at least one cage or is disengaged from another side of the at least one cage via the rotation of the handheld member ([0039]). Yeh does not explicitly disclose a handheld member, rotatably disposed on another end of the movable handle. However, Tseng teaches (figs. 1-10) a handheld member (22), rotatably disposed on another end of the movable handle ([0028]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine a rotatable handheld member of Tseng to device of Yeh in order to improve the locking stability of the handle ([Tseng, [0005]) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-6 and 8-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 4, the prior art fails to disclose, “ wherein the rotatable member further comprises a first engaging portion, the first engaging portion comprises a contacting protrusion and an engaging protrusion, the contacting protrusion and the engaging protrusion are connected to different sides of the pivoting portion, the rack comprises at least one second engaging portion, the at least one second engaging portion comprises an engaging recess, the contacting protrusion is configured to be in contact with the at least one second engaging portion, and the engaging protrusion is configured to be engaged with the engaging recess.” LI et al US 20220369478 A1, Wu et al US 20200061800 A1, as well as, Hsu et al US 9226425 B2 are all cited as teaching some elements of the claimed invention including mounting/fixing device for hot device to a chassis/computer/rack/server system . However, the prior art, when taken alone, or, in combination, cannot be construed as reasonably teaching or suggesting all of the elements of the claimed invention as arranged, disposed, or provided in the manner as claimed by the Applicant. Claims 5-6 are objected being depend on claim 4. Regarding claim 8, the prior art fails to disclose, “wherein the at least one handle assembly further comprises a rotatable member, the rotatable member comprises an assembling portion, a pivoting portion and first engaging portion, the pivoting portion is connected to the assembling portion, the movable handle is rotatably disposed on the assembling portion, the pivoting portion is rotatably disposed on the fixing member, the first engaging portion comprises a contacting protrusion and an engaging protrusion, the contacting protrusion and the engaging protrusion are connected to different sides of the pivoting portion, the contacting protrusion is configured to be in contact with at least one second engaging portion of a rack, and the engaging protrusion is configured to be engaged with an engaging recess of the at least one second engaging portion of the rack.” LI et al US 20220369478 A1, Wu et al US 20200061800 A1, as well as, Hsu et al US 9226425 B2 are all cited as teaching some elements of the claimed invention including mounting/fixing device for hot device to a chassis/computer/rack/server system . However, the prior art, when taken alone, or, in combination, cannot be construed as reasonably teaching or suggesting all of the elements of the claimed invention as arranged, disposed, or provided in the manner as claimed by the Applicant. Claims 9-10 are objected being depend on claim 8. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Fan et al US 9152189 B2: FIG. 1, an electronic assembly 100 comprises a housing structure 10, a removable electronic device 20 and a locking mechanism 30. The locking mechanism 30 is used to lock the electronic device 20 in the housing structure 10. French et al US 20150146372 A1: IG. 1 is a perspective view of a chassis 10 receiving a first blade server 20. The chassis 10 includes four bays 12, but the chassis may include any number of two or more bays for receiving two or more blade servers Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROCKSHANA D CHOWDHURY whose telephone number is (571)272-1602. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8 AM - 4:30 PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen L Parker can be reached at 303-297-4722. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROCKSHANA D CHOWDHURY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2841
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 28, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12769374
Hinge Mechanism and Electronic Device
1y 9m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12743131
DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12737010
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736080
HINGE MECHANISM AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739988
CENTRAL HOUSING OF FOLDABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.0%)
2y 2m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 682 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month