Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/220,824

CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR LIQUEFIED GAS ELECTROLYTES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 28, 2025
Examiner
AMPONSAH, OSEI K
Art Unit
1752
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
South 8 Technologies Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
488 granted / 680 resolved
+6.8% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
68 currently pending
Career history
748
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
66.1%
+26.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 680 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 5-7 of Remarks, filed 03-08-2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-9 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1) and claim(s) 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of US 2023/0024358. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102/103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over U.S. Pre-Grant Publication No. 2023/0024358 hereinafter Kim. Regarding Claim 1, Kim teaches an electrochemical cell (see figures 1-4), the electrochemical cell comprising: a cathode (positive electrode); an anode (negative electrode); an electrolyte; and a sealed cell housing that encloses the cathode, the anode and the electrolyte (paragraphs 36-38, 42-45), wherein the electrolyte comprises a solvent and a solute dissolved in the solvent (paragraph 94). Kim teaches that the solvent comprises a liquefied gas solvent (i.e., fluoromethane) (paragraph 95) and an additive (i.e., γ-butyrolactone) (paragraph 112). Kim teaches that the solute is metal hexafluorophosphate (paragraph 110). Alternatively, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to form an electrochemical cell that comprises a cathode, an anode, and an electrolyte that includes fluoromethane (i.e., liquefied gas solvent), γ-butyrolactone, and a solute before the effective filing date of the claimed invention because Kim discloses that such configuration can form an electrochemical cell with improved energy density (paragraphs 6, 42). The rationale to support a conclusion that the claim would have been obvious is that "a person of ordinary skill has good reason to pursue the known options within his or her technical grasp. If this leads to the anticipated success, it is likely that product [was] not of innovation but of ordinary skill and common sense. In that instance the fact that a combination was obvious to try might show that it was obvious under § 103." KSR, 550 U.S. at 421, 82 USPQ2d at 1397 (see MPEP § 2143, E). Claim(s) 2-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Pre-Grant Publication No. 2023/0024358 hereinafter Kim in view of U.S. Pre-Grant Publication No. 2023/0327090 hereinafter Li. Regarding Claims 2-3, Kim teaches that the solute is metal hexafluorophosphate (paragraph 110). In addition, Li teaches that the metal hexafluorophosphate is 1 mol/L LiPF6 (paragraphs 103, 107). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to use 1 mol/L LiPF6 as the metal hexafluorophosphate before the effective filing date of the claimed invention because Li discloses that such configuration can form a battery (electrochemical cell) with improved battery energy density, initial coulomb efficiency, and cycle life. Regarding Claims 4-5 and 8, Kim teaches that the solvent comprises a liquefied gas solvent (i.e., fluoromethane) (paragraph 95), an additive (i.e., γ-butyrolactone) (paragraph 112), and further comprises an organic liquid (i.e., cyclic or noncyclic carbonate) (paragraphs 96, 97). Regarding Claims 6-7 and 9, Kim teaches that the electrochemical device is a battery comprising lithium metal as the anode and graphite as the cathode (paragraphs 42, 48, 77). Regarding Claim 10, Kim teaches a sealed cell housing (see claim 1) that encloses the cathode, the anode, and the electrolyte, and wherein the cell housing maintains the electrolyte under sufficient pressure to keep the liquefied gas solvent in a liquid state (paragraph 95, see figures 1-4). In addition, Li teaches that a solid electrolyte interphase film (SEI film) is formed on a surface of the electrode (paragraphs 42, 104) and further teaches that lithium-rich materials (such as lithium acetate) do not increase a risk of gas production by the electrolyte either, and can participate in formation of a negative-electrode SEI film of the battery, without increasing impedance of the electrochemical cell (paragraph 46). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to form SEI film that comprises lithium acetate on a surface of the electrode before the effective filing date of the claimed invention because Li discloses that such configuration can form a battery (electrochemical cell) with improved battery energy density and cycle performance (paragraph 46). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OSEI K AMPONSAH whose telephone number is (571)270-3446. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NICHOLAS A SMITH can be reached at (571)272-8760. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OSEI K AMPONSAH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 28, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 24, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 08, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 10, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 18, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12586819
Non-Aqueous Electrolyte and Lithium Secondary Battery Including the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580223
STABILIZED SOLID GARNET ELECTROLYTE AND METHODS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573615
All-Solid-State Battery and Method of Manufacturing the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573717
MICROPOROUS MEMBRANES, SEPARATORS, LITHIUM BATTERIES, AND RELATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567648
EXPLOSIVE ENVIRONMENT NEUTRALIZATION IN CHEMICAL ENERGY STORAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.3%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 680 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month