Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 19/222,608

MEDIUM PROCESSING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
May 29, 2025
Priority
Jun 12, 2024 — JP 2024-095442
Examiner
KUMAR, RAKESH
Art Unit
3655
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Ricoh Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
587 granted / 1027 resolved
+5.2% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1089
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
52.5%
+12.5% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1027 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the conveyor" in in line 10. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being clearly anticipated by Amano (EP 3974193 A). Referring to claim 1. Amano discloses a medium processing apparatus (2; Figure 1) comprising: a liquid application member (62; Figure 2) to contact a medium (P) to apply liquid (ink) to the medium (p); a movement mechanism (20; Figure 17) to move the liquid application member (62) close to or away from the medium (see Figures 20-22); and a liquid-application sensor (sensor 55; Figure 6) to determine whether the liquid application member has passed through a detection area of the liquid-application sensor when the liquid application member is moved close to or away from the medium (The control section 26 drives the motor 49 based on the rotation angle of the cam shaft 47 detected by the position sensor 55 to adjust the rotation angle of the eccentric cam 48. In the present embodiment, the lowering of the head unit 20 is stopped in a state where the plate portion 20A of the head 20H is in contact with the cam surface 48A of the eccentric cam 48. Therefore, the head 20H is disposed at the recording position), wherein when the liquid application member (62; Figure 2) is moved close to the medium (P), the conveyor (28) moves the liquid application member (62; Figure 2) at a first speed (a lowering speed of the rack 28) to get close to the medium (P) after the liquid application member (62; Figure 2) has passed through the detection area (as the position is determined by sensor 55; Figure 6), and moves the liquid application member (62; Figure 2) at a second speed (lowers at a speed lower than a lowering speed of the rack 28) slower than the first speed (a lowering speed of the rack 28) to get close to the medium (P) until the liquid application member passes through the detection area (as the position area is determined by sensor 55; Figure 6). Referring to claim 2. Amano discloses a medium processing apparatus (2; Figure 1) comprising: wherein the movement mechanism (20; Figure 17) maintains the second speed (lowers at a speed lower than a lowering speed of the rack 28) of the liquid application member (62; Figure 2) after the liquid application member (62; Figure 2) has reached the detection area of the liquid-application sensor (as the position area is determined by sensor 55; Figure 6) and until the liquid-application sensor detects (as the position area is determined by sensor 55; Figure 6) that the liquid application member has passed through the detection area (a lowering speed of the rack 28). Referring to claim 3. Amano discloses a medium processing apparatus (2; Figure 1) comprising: wherein the movement mechanism (20; Figure 17) moves the liquid application member (62; Figure 2) at the first speed (a lowering speed of the rack 28) toward the medium (P) by a given distance after the liquid-application sensor detects that the liquid application member has passed through the detection area (the position is determined by sensor 55; Figure 6). Referring to claim 4. Amano discloses a medium processing apparatus (2; Figure 1) comprising: wherein the movement mechanism (20; Figure 17) controls movement of the liquid application member (62; Figure 2) for the liquid application member (62; Figure 2) to keep contacting the medium (P) for given time (for depositing ink). Referring to claim 5. Amano discloses a medium processing apparatus (2; Figure 1) comprising: wherein the conveyor (28) moves the liquid application member (62; Figure 2) at the first speed (a lowering speed of the rack 28), and changes speed of the liquid application member (62; Figure 2) to a third speed slower than the first speed before the liquid application member contacts the medium (a third speed equal to, a speed lower than a lowering speed of the rack 28). Referring to claim 6. Amano discloses a medium processing apparatus (2; Figure 1) comprising: wherein the liquid application member (62; Figure 2) is at a first standby position (a position after which the speed changes to a second speed) before the liquid is to be applied to the medium (P), and wherein the movement mechanism starts moving the liquid application member (62; Figure 2) from a second standby position (position for depositing ink onto the medium) closer to the medium (P) than the first standby position. Referring to claim 7. Amano discloses a medium processing apparatus (2; Figure 1) comprising: wherein the movement mechanism (20; Figure 17) adjusts a moving distance to make the liquid application member (62; Figure 2) contact the medium (P) based on a number of a plurality of media (P) that make up a medium bundle (a bundle of 1 media) including the medium to which the liquid has been applied. Referring to claim 8. Amano discloses a image forming system (1; Figure 1) comprising: an image forming apparatus (apparatus within 1) to form an image on a medium; and the medium processing apparatus (2; Figure 1) according to claim 1 to perform given processing (printing) on the medium (P) on which the image is formed by the image forming apparatus (printing on media P). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAKESH KUMAR whose telephone number is (571)272-8314. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH from 8AM-6:30PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gene Crawford can be reached at (571) 272-6911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAKESH KUMAR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3651
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 29, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12762508
ORDER FULFILLMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD WITH ITEM SENSOR
8y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759783
SELF-DESTRUCTIVE DISPENSER FOR CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12752961
Shipping And Dispensing Construct
5y 3m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12740761
MEDICAL CONDOM AND AUTOMATIC MEDICAL CONDOM SUPPLY DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735242
Dispenser
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+28.2%)
2y 11m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1027 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month