Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/223,330

PHOTOELECTRIC CONVERSION ELEMENT, IMAGING ELEMENT, OPTICAL SENSOR, MANUFACTURING METHOD OF IMAGING ELEMENT, AND COMPOUND

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
May 30, 2025
Priority
Dec 09, 2022 — JP 2022-196744 +2 more
Examiner
TRINH, THANH TRUC
Art Unit
1726
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
22%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
Est. Remaining
33%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 22% of cases
22%
Career Allowance Rate
181 granted / 819 resolved
-42.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 2m
Avg Prosecution
55 currently pending
Career history
878
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
49.9%
+9.9% vs TC avg
§102
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§112
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 819 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of group I, claims 21-32 drawn to a compound having formula (1) and species B drawn to a compound using formulas (4) or (5), in the reply filed on 7/15/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 1-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to nonelected inventions, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 7/15/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 21-32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. A broad range or limitation together with a narrow range or limitation that falls within the broad range or limitation (in the same claim) may be considered indefinite if the resulting claim does not clearly set forth the metes and bounds of the patent protection desired. See MPEP § 2173.05(c). In the present instance, claim 21 recites the broad recitation “Y21, Y22, Y23, Y24, Y31, Y32, Y33, Y34, Y41, Y42, Y51 and Y52 each independently represent -CRY1= or a nitrogen atom, and RY1 represents a hydrogen atom or a substituent” in lines 16-17, and the claim also recites “in Formula (2), at least one of Y21, ..., or Y24 represents -CRs=, in Formula (3), at least one of Y31,..., or Y34 represents -CRs=, in Formula (4), at least one of Y41or Y42 represents -CRs=, and in Formula (5), at least one of Y51 or Y52 represents -CRs= where Rs represents an alkyl group which may have a substituent, an alkenyl group which may have a substituent, an alkynyl group which may have a substituent, an aryl group which may have a substituent, a heteroaryl group which may have a substituent, an alkoxy group which may have a substituent, an aryloxy group which may have a substituent, an amino group which may have a substituent, a silyl group which may have a substituent, a cyano group, or a halogen atom” in lines 18-26, which is the narrower statement of the range/limitation. The claim(s) are considered indefinite because there is a question or doubt as to whether the feature introduced by such narrower language is (a) merely exemplary of the remainder of the claim, and therefore not required, or (b) a required feature of the claims. Claims 22-32 are rejected on the same ground as claim 21 and for reciting the same issue as claim 21. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 21-32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gabrian et al. (“Exploring the Optoelectronic Properties of D-A and A-D-A 2,2’-bi[3,2-b]thienothiophene Derivatives”). Regarding claim 21, Gabrian et al. discloses an A-D-A compound (see Chart 2) having a formula as claimed, wherein D PNG media_image1.png 102 135 media_image1.png Greyscale represent a group represented by PNG media_image2.png 100 62 media_image2.png Greyscale , which has the claimed formula (4), R1 and R2 each independently represent a hydrogen atom, and A1 and A2 each independently represent a group represented by PNG media_image3.png 86 73 media_image3.png Greyscale or PNG media_image4.png 93 72 media_image4.png Greyscale which has the claimed formula (A-1), and Y41 and Y42 each represented a -CRY1= with RY1 to be a substituent or -CRs= with Rs representing an alkoxy group. In the formula (A-1) of PNG media_image3.png 86 73 media_image3.png Greyscale or PNG media_image4.png 93 72 media_image4.png Greyscale of Gabrian et al. having C1 represents a ring containing two or more carbon atoms, W1 represents an oxygen. Regarding claim 22, Gabrian et al. discloses a compound as in claim 21 above, and teaches a RY1 representing an alkoxy group. Regarding claim 23, Gabrian et al. discloses a compound as in claim 21 above, and teaches D represented by a group represented by formula (4-11) with X41 and X42 each independently representing a sulfur atom, Rs represents an alkoxy. Regarding claim 24, Gabrian et al. discloses a compound as in claim 21 above, and teaches Rs representing an alkoxy of O-C6H13, which is an alkoxy group having 5 carbon atoms and having a substituent. Regarding claim 25, Gabrian et al. discloses a compound as in claim 24 above, and teaches a choice of D or formula (4-11). The reference is deemed to be anticipatory for the instant claim since the instant claim recites the other choices. Regarding claim 26, Gabrian et al. discloses a compound as in claim 21 above, and teaches W1 is an oxygen atom. Regarding claim 27-29, Gabrian et al. discloses a compound as in claim 21 above, and teaches a choice of the claimed formula (A-1). See claim 21 above. The reference is deemed to be anticipatory for the instant claims since the instant claims recite the other choices of formula (A-1). Regarding claim 30, Gabrian et al. discloses a compound as in claim 21 above, and teaches Rs representing an alkoxy of O-C6H13, which is an alkoxy group having 5 carbon atoms and having a substituent, e.g. C1 substituent. Regarding claim 31, Gabrian et al. discloses a compound as in claim 24 above, and teaches D represents the group represented by formula (4-11) as claimed. Regarding claim 32, Gabrian et al. discloses a compound as in claim 31 above, and teaches a choice of Rs (see explanation in claim 21 above). The reference is deemed to be anticipatory for the instant claim since the instant claim recites other choices of Rs. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THANH-TRUC TRINH whose telephone number is (571)272-6594. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00am - 6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey T. Barton can be reached at 5712721307. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. THANH-TRUC TRINH Primary Examiner Art Unit 1726 /THANH TRUC TRINH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1726
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 30, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12696550
POWER ROUTING MODULE WITH A SWITCHING MATRIX FOR A SOLAR CELL ARRAY
9y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12683548
DECOUPLING OF A PEROVSKITE SOLAR CELL IN DARKNESS
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12635284
SOLAR CELL AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
10y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12598838
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR ACHIEVING A MICRO LOUVER EFFECT IN A PHOTOVOLTAIC CELL
8y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598835
SOLAR CELL AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF, PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULE
3y 8m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
22%
Grant Probability
33%
With Interview (+10.8%)
4y 2m (~2y 10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 819 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month