Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 19/223,998

LIGHT CONDITIONING OF DIRECT VIEW DISPLAY FOR CINEMA

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 30, 2025
Priority
Nov 14, 2017 — provisional 62/585,869 +3 more
Examiner
MONSHI, SAMIRA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Imax Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
405 granted / 506 resolved
+20.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
517
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
51.6%
+11.6% vs TC avg
§102
32.4%
-7.6% vs TC avg
§112
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 506 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, and 17-21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Huber (US 20180059429 A1). Regarding claim 1, Huber discloses An emissive panel for a display, comprising: an array of light sources arranged in rows and in columns that are perpendicular to the rows, the array of light sources comprising: Fig. 11 and [0080] for a stereoscopic display system, comprising an array of Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) a first set of light sources comprising a first light source element fabricated as a singular device and configured to transmit first light intended for a left-eye image; and [0080]-[0083] for array of Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) comprising a plurality of left LEDs, each left LED comprising left side electrical connections associated with a left housing, a left light transmitter arrangement within the left housing, and a left polarizing element positioned with the left housing above the left light transmitter arrangement a second set of light sources comprising a second light source element fabricated as another singular device and configured to transmit second light intended for a right-eye image, wherein the transmitted first light and the transmitted second light are viewable with stereoscopic glasses as a stereoscopic image. [0080]-[0083] for a plurality of right LEDs, each right LED comprising right side electrical connections associated with a right housing, a right light transmitter arrangement within the right housing, and a right polarizing element positioned with the right housing and above the right light transmitter arrangement. See also [0073] The combination of the precise orientation of the right polarizer(s) and left polarizer(s) assembled in an alternating pattern in a series of one LED module or multiple LED modules results in a 3D stereoscopic viewing experience when used with matched 3D glasses when images in a corresponding stereoscopic video format are transmitted. Regarding claim 5, Huber discloses The emissive panel of claim 1, wherein the first light source element is fabricated with a first polarizer of a first state of polarization, wherein the second light source element is fabricated with a second polarizer of a second state of polarization, the first state of polarization being linearly orthogonal to the second state of polarization. [0081] one left LED comprises a left diffuser material positioned between the left polarizing element and the left light transmitter arrangement, and at least one right LED comprises a right diffuser material positioned between the right polarizing element and the right light transmitter arrangement. Regarding claim 6, Huber discloses The emissive panel of claim 5, wherein the first light source element and the second light source element are fabricated as a group of light sources with a set of primary wavelengths. [0049] and FIG. 1 shows the material body or “housing” 100 of the LED and the registration key or slot 104 used for aligning and holding the polarizer material or lens in a correct or proper rotation and orientation. FIG. 1 also includes semiconductors 103 (Red, Green, and Blue semiconductors in this case) that are the light emitting elements in this example of a SMD LED Regarding claim 9, Huber discloses The emissive panel of claim 6, wherein the set of primary wavelengths comprise a red wavelength, a green wavelength, and a blue wavelength. [0049] and FIG. 1 shows the material body or “housing” 100 of the LED and the registration key or slot 104 used for aligning and holding the polarizer material or lens in a correct or proper rotation and orientation. FIG. 1 also includes semiconductors 103 (Red, Green, and Blue semiconductors in this case) that are the light emitting elements in this example of a SMD LED Regarding claim 11, Huber discloses The emissive panel of claim 1, wherein the first light source element is fabricated as a first group of light sources with a first set of primary wavelengths configured to transmit light intended for the left-eye image, and wherein the second light source element is fabricated as a second group of light sources with a second set of primary wavelengths configured to transmit light intended for the right-eye image. [0049] and FIG. 1 shows the material body or “housing” 100 of the LED and the registration key or slot 104 used for aligning and holding the polarizer material or lens in a correct or proper rotation and orientation. FIG. 1 also includes semiconductors 103 (Red, Green, and Blue semiconductors in this case) that are the light emitting elements in this example of a SMD LED Regarding claim 13, Huber discloses The emissive panel of claim 11, wherein the first light source element comprises a first filter and the second light source element comprises a second filter. [0076] With respect to the grid, FIG. 12 shows an angled cross sectional view of the plastic or alloy front facing cover of a LED tile or module. FIG. 12 shows various elements making up the protective cover, including a plastic or alloy cover 1203 that contains left polarizer and filter 1201 and right polarizer and filter 1202. Regarding claim 17, Huber discloses The emissive panel of claim 1, wherein the first set of light sources and the second set of light sources are light-emitting diodes. Fig. 11 and [0080] for a stereoscopic display system, comprising an array of Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) Regarding claim 18, Huber discloses The emissive panel of claim 1, wherein the first set of light sources and the second set of light sources are quantum dots. [0041] Regarding claim 19, Huber discloses The emissive panel of claim 1, wherein the first set of light sources and the second set of light sources are organic light emitters. Fig. 11 and [0080] for a stereoscopic display system, comprising an array of Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) Regarding claim 20, Huber discloses The emissive panel of claim 1, wherein the first set of light sources and the second set of light sources are positioned with random gap spacing between each light source of the first set of light sources, between each light source of the second set of light sources, and between the first set of light sources and the second set of light sources. Figs 9, 10 and 11 and [0059] separate carrier tapes each holding one or more right/left polarized SMD LE Regarding claim 21, Huber discloses The emissive panel of claim 1, wherein the first light source element and the second light source element each comprise a spectral filter. [0076] With respect to the grid, FIG. 12 shows an angled cross sectional view of the plastic or alloy front facing cover of a LED tile or module. FIG. 12 shows various elements making up the protective cover, including a plastic or alloy cover 1203 that contains left polarizer and filter 1201 and right polarizer and filter 1202. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huber (US 20180059429 A1) in view of Super et al. (US 20150170537 A1) (Super). Regarding claim 14, Huber fails to disclose The emissive panel of claim 1, further comprising: a plurality of audio ports integrated into the emissive panel. In the same field of endeavor, Super discloses a plurality of audio ports integrated into the emissive panel. [0030] microphone 170 can be integrated with or attached to stereoscopic glasses 180. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one ordinary skill in the art before the effecting filing date the invention was made to incorporate the system/method of integrating microphone 170 to stereoscopic glasses 180 as disclosed by Super to the stereoscopic glasses as disclosed by Huber in order to provide an alternative input mechanism that allows use voice to provide instructions to computing device. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 22, 23-29 are allowed. Claims 2-4, 7, 8 ,10, 12, 15 and 16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMIRA MONSHI whose telephone number is (571)272-0995. The examiner can normally be reached 8 AM-5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John W Miller can be reached at 5712727353. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMIRA MONSHI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2422
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 30, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12701304
VIDEO GENERATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695853
Solid-state light source projector with improved color uniformity
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12680759
INSPECTION APPARATUS FOR MELTING FURNACES THAT CAN BE USED IN THE STEEL INDUSTRY AND METHOD
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678029
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CHANGING THE DIRECTION OF VIEW DURING VIDEO GUIDED CLINICAL PROCEDURES USING REAL-TIME IMAGE PROCESSING
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677023
AUTOMATIC PARENTAL CONTROL USING A REMOTE CONTROL OR MOBILE APP
3y 12m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+6.0%)
2y 3m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 506 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month