Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/226,277

APPLICATION INFRASTRUCTURE FOR MAINTAINING PRODUCTION AND NON-PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTS USING A SEGREGATED SCHEMA

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 03, 2025
Priority
Dec 19, 2022 — divisional of 12/353,368
Examiner
SHANMUGASUNDARAM, KANNAN
Art Unit
2168
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Express Scripts Strategic Development Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
432 granted / 597 resolved
+17.4% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+36.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
630
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
§103
51.9%
+11.9% vs TC avg
§102
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
§112
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 597 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-20 are pending in the Instant Application. Claims 1-10 are rejected. Claims 11-20 are withdrawn from consideration as being nonelected. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority The Instant Application, filed 06/03/2025, is a divisional of 18/083,839, filed 12/19/2022. Thus, the earliest effective filing date is 12/19/2022 for what is recited therein. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I, claims 1-10 in the reply filed on 08/17/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the grounds that Groups I and II are closely related, have a common utility, and do not present a serious burden because separate searches allegedly are not required. This is not found persuasive. Group I and Group 2 are related as combination and subcombination inventions. This does not require that the subcombination has utility by itself or in another materially different combination. However, examination of the inventions would impose a serious search burden because Group 1 is directed to decrypting individual records from an external vendor, while Group II is directed to maintaining a production schema and a developer schema separately to validate changes before putting change into production. The fact that the inventions share a common utility or relate to the same overall system does not eliminate the separate search burden. Thus, the requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 11-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected Group 2, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 08/17/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor regards as the invention. Claim 1 contains the trademark/trade name Linux. Where a trademark or trade name is used in a claim as a limitation to identify or describe a particular material. See Ex parte Simpson, 218 USPQ 1020 (Bd. App. 1982). The claim scope is uncertain since the trademark or trade name cannot be used properly to identify any particular material or product. A trademark or trade name is used to identify a source of goods, and not the goods themselves. Thus, a trademark or trade name does not identify or describe the goods associated with the trademark or trade name. In the present case, the trademark is used to identify the operating system rather than describing it generically and, accordingly, the identification is indefinite. The dependent claims are rejected based on their dependence on a rejected claim. *After extensive search, there is no prior art rejection for claims 1-10 at this time. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KANNAN SHANMUGASUNDARAM whose telephone number is (571)270-7763. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00 AM -6:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Charles Rones can be reached at (571) 272-4085. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KANNAN SHANMUGASUNDARAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2168
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 03, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12769743
SEARCH RESULT ANNOTATIONS
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12762140
GENERATING PERIOD-OVER-PERIOD CALCULATIONS USING A CLOUD-BASED DATA WAREHOUSE
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12748799
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HYPOTHESIS AND RESEARCH SYNTHESIS USING MACHINE LEARNING
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743433
BIAS QUOTIENT MEASUREMENT AND DEBIASING FOR RECOMMENDATION ENGINES
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743348
Scalable Low-Loss Disaster Recovery for Data Stores
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+36.0%)
3y 7m (~2y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 597 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month