Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/226,764

AUTOMATICALLY ASSESSING AN ANATOMICAL SURFACE FEATURE AND SECURELY MANAGING INFORMATION RELATED TO THE SAME

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jun 03, 2025
Priority
May 02, 2016 — continuation of 10/013,527 +4 more
Examiner
PHAM, NAM D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Aranz Healthcare Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
500 granted / 551 resolved
+30.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
575
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§103
54.2%
+14.2% vs TC avg
§102
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§112
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 551 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Summary This office action for US Patent application 19/226764 is responsive to communications filed on August 6th, 2025. Currently, claims 1-42 are pending are presented for examination while claims 1-13 were canceled. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. Effective January 1, 1994, a registered attorney or agent of record may sign a terminal disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with 37 CFR 3.73(b). Claims 14-42 inprovisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 14-33 of copending Application No 18/418095, now US Patent 12,340,896, claim 14 of copending Application No 17/567270, now US Patent No. 11,923,073 and claim 1 of copending Application No 15/144722, now US Patent No. 10,013,527. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because it is merely in the terminology used in both sets of claims. Instant Application-18/418095- Instant Application-19/226764- 14. A computer-implemented method for evaluating an anatomical surface feature ("surface feature"), the method comprising: capturing, at an image capture device, raw data characterizing the surface feature; sending the raw data from the image capture device over a wired communications link to a personal computing device that is local to the image capture device; receiving the raw data at a non-volatile storage device remote from the image capture device and the personal computing device, the raw data being received from the personal computing device; according to instructions executed at a processor of a remote server computer and/or at the personal computing device, determining one or more measurements of the surface feature based on the raw data; storing, at the non-volatile storage device remote from the image capture device and the personal computing device, the determined one or more measurements of the surface feature; and displaying the determined one or more measurements on a web-based interface. Claim 14-33 14.A computer-implemented method for evaluating an anatomical surface feature ("surface feature"), the method comprising: capturing, at an image capture device, data characterizing the surface feature; temporarily storing the data in the image capture device; connecting the image capture device via a detachable wired communications link to a personal computing device that is local to the image capture device; sending the data from the image capture device over the wired communications link to the personal computing device; receiving the data at a non-volatile storage device remote from the image capture device and the personal computing device, the data being received from the personal computing device; according to instructions executed at a processor of a remote server computer and/or at the personal computing device, determining one or more measurements of the surface feature, based on the data; storing, at the non-volatile storage device remote from the image capture device and the personal computing device, the determined one or more measurements of the surface feature; and displaying the determined one or more measurements on a web-based interface. Claims 15-42 Conflicting Co-pending Application 17/567270 Instant Application-19/226764- 14. A computer-implemented method for evaluating an anatomical surface feature ("surface feature") of a patient, the method comprising: capturing, using a capture device, video data including the surface feature; transmitting the captured video data from the capture device to a remote server computer; at a personal computing device, displaying on a web-based interface live image data based on the captured video data; the capture device capturing one or more data sets characterizing the surface feature; according to instructions executed at a processor of the remote server computer and/or the personal computing device, determining one or more measurements of the surface feature based on the one or more data sets; storing, at a non-volatile storage device remote from the capture device, the determined one or more measurements; and displaying the determined one or more measurements on the web-based interface. Claim 14 14.A computer-implemented method for evaluating an anatomical surface feature ("surface feature"), the method comprising: capturing, at an image capture device, data characterizing the surface feature; temporarily storing the data in the image capture device; connecting the image capture device via a detachable wired communications link to a personal computing device that is local to the image capture device; sending the data from the image capture device over the wired communications link to the personal computing device; receiving the data at a non-volatile storage device remote from the image capture device and the personal computing device, the data being received from the personal computing device; according to instructions executed at a processor of a remote server computer and/or at the personal computing device, determining one or more measurements of the surface feature, based on the data; storing, at the non-volatile storage device remote from the image capture device and the personal computing device, the determined one or more measurements of the surface feature; and displaying the determined one or more measurements on a web-based interface. Claims 25, 34 Conflicting Co-pending Application 15/144,722 Instant Application-19/226764- 1.A computer-implemented method for evaluating an anatomical surface feature ("surface feature"), the method comprising: receiving, at a non-volatile storage device, raw data characterizing the surface feature, wherein the data is generated at and received from a remote image capture device; according to instructions executed at a processor of a remote server computer and/or a personal computing device, determining an area of the surface feature and a volume of the surface feature based on the raw data; storing, at the non-volatile storage device remote from the image capture device, the determined area and the determined volume of the surface feature; and displaying the determined area and the determined volume on a web-based interface that is accessible via a personal computing device. Claim 1 14.A computer-implemented method for evaluating an anatomical surface feature ("surface feature"), the method comprising: capturing, at an image capture device, data characterizing the surface feature; temporarily storing the data in the image capture device; connecting the image capture device via a detachable wired communications link to a personal computing device that is local to the image capture device; sending the data from the image capture device over the wired communications link to the personal computing device; receiving the data at a non-volatile storage device remote from the image capture device and the personal computing device, the data being received from the personal computing device; according to instructions executed at a processor of a remote server computer and/or at the personal computing device, determining one or more measurements of the surface feature, based on the data; storing, at the non-volatile storage device remote from the image capture device and the personal computing device, the determined one or more measurements of the surface feature; and displaying the determined one or more measurements on a web-based interface. Claims 25, 34 Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claims 14, 25 and 34 are generic to all that is recited in claims of co-pending applications. That is, claims 14, 25 and 34 are anticipated by claims of co-pending applications. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 14-42 is/are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting. However, these claims would be allowable if the obvious-type double patenting is overcome. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications form the examiner should be directed to Nam Pham, whose can be contacted by phone at (571)270-7352. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon—Thurs. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, CZEKAJ DAVID, can be reached on (571)272-7327. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) AT 866-217-9197 (too free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NAM D PHAM/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2487
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 03, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 06, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676978
DECODING METHOD, ENCODING METHOD, DECODER, AND, ENCODER
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676979
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ENCODING AND DECODING A PICTURE USING PICTURE BOUNDARY HANDLING
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671800
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE
10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666022
METHODS AND APPARATUS OF VIDEO CODING IN 4:4:4 COLOR FORMAT
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666023
METHODS AND APPARATUS OF VIDEO CODING IN 4:4:4 COLOR FORMAT
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+1.5%)
1y 11m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 551 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month