Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/228,720

COMPRESSING DATA PORTIONS IN A TRANSLATION LOOKASIDE BUFFER

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jun 04, 2025
Priority
Apr 26, 2024 — continuation of 12/455,832
Examiner
VERBRUGGE, KEVIN
Art Unit
2132
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
515 granted / 580 resolved
+33.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -2% lift
Without
With
+-2.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
590
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
55.6%
+15.6% vs TC avg
§102
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
§112
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 580 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over the claims of U.S. Patent No. 12,455,832. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the differences are not material to patentability. Essentially all that Applicant has done to the patented claims to arrive at the instant claims is remove limitations. It is obvious to remove limitations from patented claims. The claim chart below shows the differences between instant claim 1 and patented claim 1. Instant claim 1 Patented claim 1 from US 12,455,832 1. A method for translation lookaside buffer (TLB) compression, comprising: 1. A method for translation lookaside buffer (TLB) compression, comprising: determining that a plurality of physical memory addresses, which are associated with a plurality of virtual memory addresses, are contiguous with one another, determining that a plurality of physical memory addresses, which are associated with a plurality of virtual memory addresses, are contiguous with one another and share one or more common address bits or one or more common attribute bits, wherein each respective physical memory address of the plurality of physical memory addresses corresponds to a separate respective physical memory page; wherein each respective physical memory address of the plurality of physical memory addresses corresponds to a separate respective physical memory page; generating a tag for an entry in a TLB, the tag representing the plurality of virtual memory addresses; generating a tag for an entry in a TLB, the tag representing the plurality of virtual memory addresses; and associating, in the entry in the TLB, the tag with data comprising bits representing the plurality of physical memory addresses. and associating, in the entry in the TLB, the tag with data comprising: a single instance of the one or more common address bits or the one or more common attribute bits of the plurality of physical memory addresses; and one or more other bits from each physical memory address of the plurality of physical memory addresses, other than the one or more common address bits or the one or more common attribute bits, that are not shared across the plurality of physical memory addresses. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this Office action should be directed to the Examiner by phone at (571) 272-4214. Any response to this Office action should be labeled appropriately (including serial number, Art Unit 2132, and type of response) and mailed to Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450; hand-carried or delivered to the Customer Service Window at the Knox Building, 501 Dulany Street, Alexandria, VA 22314; faxed to (571) 273-8300; or filed electronically using the Patent Center. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from the Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about the Patent Center and visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kevin Verbrugge/ Kevin Verbrugge Primary Examiner Art Unit 2132
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 04, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681851
STORAGE DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANAGING WRITE OPERATIONS
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669963
MEMORY SEARCHING COMPONENT
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663921
MEMORY DEVICES AND SYSTEMS INCLUDING HYBRID CACHE, AND RELATED METHODS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12664098
ADDRESS BOUNDARY FUNCTIONS FOR PHYSICAL AND LOCALIZED ADDRESSES
1y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12638970
MEMORY SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING NONVOLATILE MEMORY
1y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (-2.5%)
2y 1m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 580 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month