Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/229,414

PHASE SHIFTING APPARATUS AND PROCESS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 05, 2025
Priority
Jun 06, 2024 — provisional 63/656,868
Examiner
YALDO, ABIGAIL AMIR
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
The Penn State Research Foundation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allowance Rate
59 granted / 63 resolved
+33.7% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
80
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
§102
37.0%
-3.0% vs TC avg
§112
40.9%
+0.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 63 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 17-19 depend upon rejected claim 15 and inherit the deficiency thereby. Claim 15, Line 3, “a signal” is unclear to one of ordinary skill in the art as to how this recitation is related to the “a signal” as defined in line 1 of the same claim, thereby leaving the boundaries of the claim unclear. Claim 15, Line 3, “a first transmission line” is unclear to one of ordinary skill in the art as to how this recitation is related to the “a first transmission line” as defined in line 1 of the same claim, (i.e. the same transmission line, separate and distinct transmission lines, etc.) thereby leaving the boundaries of the claim unclear. Claim 16, Line 2, “a loss of data” is unclear to one of ordinary skill in the art as to how this recitation is related to the “a loss of data” as previously defined in line 10 of claim 15, (i.e. the same data loss, separate and distinct data loss, etc.) from which this claim depends, thereby leaving the boundaries of the claim unclear. Claim 16, Lines 3-4, “one or more unit cells” is unclear to one of ordinary skill in the art as to how this recitation is related to the “multiple unit cells” as previously defined in line 11 of claim 15, (i.e. the same unit cells, separate and distinct unit cells, etc.) from which this claim depends, thereby leaving the boundaries of the claim unclear. Claim 20, Line 1, “at least one first switch” is unclear to one of ordinary skill in the art as to how this recitation is related to the “at least one first switch” as previously defined in line 5 of claim 15, (i.e. the same switch, separate and distinct switches, etc.) from which this claim depends, thereby leaving the boundaries of the claim unclear. Claim 20, Line 1, “a second switch” is unclear to one of ordinary skill in the art as to how this recitation is related to the “a second switch” as previously defined in lines 6-7 of claim 15, (i.e. the same switch, separate and distinct switches, etc.) from which this claim depends, thereby leaving the boundaries of the claim unclear. Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-14 are allowed. The closest prior art of record to is Zeine (US 20220359984), Liu (US 20240120653), Uemichi (US 12040765), and Shapiro (US 11075612), while teaching phase shifter having a plurality of spaced apart unit cells, including at least four unit cells, between a first and second transmission line, a first switch positioned between the first and second transmission line to couple or uncouple the first and second transmission line, and the unit cells being adjustable into different modes of operation, such as a propagation mode wherein the first switch is off and the second switch is on, connection mode wherein the first switch is on and the second switch is off, and short mode wherein the first and second switch are on, fails to teach or suggest a second switch adjacent to the first switch that couples or prevents coupling of the first switch to ground as recited in independent claims 1 and 9. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The most pertinent prior art to independent claims 1, 9 and 15 is Zeine (US 20220359984), which teaches a phase shifter having a first and second transmission line, a first switch positioned between the first and second transmission line to couple or uncouple the first and second transmission line. Another pertinent prior art to independent claims 1, 9 and 15 is Liu (US 20240120653), which teaches a phase shifter having a plurality of spaced apart unit cells between a first and second transmission line, a first switch positioned between the first and second transmission line to couple or uncouple the first and second transmission line. A further pertinent prior art to independent claims 1, 9 and 15 is Shapiro (US 11075612), which teaches the unit cells being adjustable into different modes of operation, such as a propagation mode wherein the first switch is off and the second switch is on, connection mode wherein the first switch is on and the second switch is off, and short mode wherein the first and second switch are on. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ABIGAIL YALDO whose telephone number is (703)756-1784. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7 AM - 4 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Lindgren Baltzell can be reached at (571) 272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ABIGAIL AMIR YALDO/Examiner, Art Unit 2843 /ANDREA LINDGREN BALTZELL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 05, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12739967
Core Resonance Suppression in Signal Integrity Optimized Package
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738917
RF IMPEDANCE MATCHING NETWORK WITH CLAMPING CIRCUIT
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738623
COUPLER AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732149
DIFFERENTIAL DIGITAL STEP ATTENUATORS WITH LEAKAGE CANCELLATION
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12706360
DUAL-MODE DIELECTRIC WAVEGUIDE FILTER AND DIELECTRIC WAVEGUIDE FILTERING APPARATUS
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.4%)
2y 3m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 63 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month