Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/229,706

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UPDATING USER INTERFACE ELEMENT DISPLAY PROPERTIES BASED ON USER HISTORY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 05, 2025
Priority
Jun 30, 2014 — continuation of 9729933 +5 more
Examiner
SHANG, ANNAN Q
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Adeia Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
585 granted / 828 resolved
+10.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
869
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
60.8%
+20.8% vs TC avg
§102
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
§112
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 828 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 2. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. 3. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CORDRAY et al (2007/0157247) in view of LEGALL et al (6,005,565) As to claim 1-6, CORDRAY discloses systems and methods for managing content and further discloses a method comprising: accessing a database (Server or Device) comprising a plurality of data for a plurality of user profiles; accessing a user profile of the plurality of user profiles to process a respective data structure (Profile Guide or schedules based on monitor viewing history) of the plurality of data structures (associated with respective profile(s)) to identify a plurality of content items; for each respective content item of the plurality of content items (figs; 7-15, [0007-0009]; [0062-0063] [0131-0135]-viewing history, [0145-0149]-viewing history [0169-0171]), the interactive media guidance App (IMG-APP) monitors watched shows, series, episodes, etc. stored at the user device or server and new content or other shows, series, episodes, etc., to generate specific profile(s): Mom, Family, Mary, Guest, etc. comprising the visual indicators for listing of viewed or unviewed (respective data structures) content and New to Me “NW” shows, series, particular episode that has been airing for a time period; the claimed “first region…” and “second region…” are functional descriptive and can be directed to any region within the display interface; various terms that includes viewing history, option to Browser User Profile; various displays options: viewing history listings, listing of programs, ads viewed and not viewed, related info schedules, listings of descriptions, actors, schedule info, etc., on screens); analyzing the respective data structure to extract a respective subset of frames from the respective content item, based at least in part on data in the respective data structure that is indicative of a history of devices associated with the user profile accessing content items related to the respective content item; and generating a respective user interface (UI) element for displaying the respective subset of frames extracted from the respective content item; and generating for display, on a device associated with the user profile, a display simultaneously displaying at least some of the respective UI elements (figs.14-22, [0062-0069], [0099-0102], [0131-0135]-viewing history, [0145-0149]-viewing history [0169-0171] and [0181-0191]), Server or Device compares the viewing history of media assets previously accessed by the user with a plurality of media assets; (IMG-APP) monitors watched shows, series, episodes, etc. stored at the user device or server and new content or other shows, series, episodes, etc., to generate specific profile(s): Mom, Family, Mary, Guest, etc. comprising the visual indicators for listing of viewed or unviewed content and New to Me “NW” shows, series, particular episode that has been airing for a time period; the claimed “first region…” and “second region…”; various terms that includes viewing history, option to Browser User Profile; various displays options: Data structure: viewing history listings, listing of programs, ads viewed and not viewed, related info schedules, listings of descriptions, actors, schedule info, etc., on screens); CORDRAY further discloses that the IMG-APP may be provided as on-line Apps, IPTV or website generating for display a landing page of a media provider service and options to interact, select various options to perform searches and browse various media contents ([0051-0059], [0078-0080] and [0134-0138]), BUT appears silent as to wherein the simultaneous displaying comprises simultaneous displaying on the landing page: a first UI element for a first video available from the media provider service, wherein the first UI element shows multiple frames extracted from the first video; and a second UI element for a second video available from the media provider service, wherein the second UI element shows multiple frames extracted from the second video; wherein: the first UI element comprises a title of the first video overlayed over frames extracted from the first video; and the second UI element comprises a title of the second video overlayed over frames extracted from the second video; wherein: user interface interaction with the first UI element causes playing of the first video; and user interface interaction with the second UI element causes playing of the second video; wherein the landing page of the media provider service comprises a plurality of screen areas, wherein each screen area of the plurality of screen areas corresponds to a respective content category; and wherein the simultaneous displaying comprises displaying UI elements sorted into the plurality of screen areas; wherein the landing page of the media provider service comprises a plurality of screen areas, wherein each screen area of the plurality of screen areas corresponds to a respective user activity; and wherein the simultaneous displaying comprises displaying UI elements sorted into the plurality of screen areas. However, in the same field of endeavor, LEGALL disclose an integrated search of EPG< Internet and other information resources and further discloses simultaneously displaying previously access media asset list and other media asset and further uses user profile data from a second application to retrieve additional media asset; including simultaneous displaying comprises simultaneous displaying on the landing page: a first UI element for a first video available from the media provider service, wherein the first UI element shows multiple frames extracted from the first video; and a second UI element for a second video available from the media provider service, wherein the second UI element shows multiple frames extracted from the second video; wherein: the first UI element comprises a title of the first video overlayed over frames extracted from the first video; and the second UI element comprises a title of the second video overlayed over frames extracted from the second video; wherein: user interface interaction with the first UI element causes playing of the first video; and user interface interaction with the second UI element causes playing of the second video; wherein the landing page of the media provider service comprises a plurality of screen areas, wherein each screen area of the plurality of screen areas corresponds to a respective content category; and wherein the simultaneous displaying comprises displaying UI elements sorted into the plurality of screen areas; wherein the landing page of the media provider service comprises a plurality of screen areas, wherein each screen area of the plurality of screen areas corresponds to a respective user activity; and wherein the simultaneous displaying comprises displaying UI elements sorted into the plurality of screen areas (figs.2-4, Col.2, line 38-Col.4, line 1+), displays search result via the Information resources and other media asset simultaneously; performs power searches to generate additional results to specific requests to simultaneous display specific media contents: frames, videos, icons, thumbnails, etc. within various screens associated with the display page. Hence it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the invention to incorporate the reaching of LEGALL into the system of CORDRAY to provide additional enhancement to the display interface including generating search results from other resources As to claim 7, CORDRAY further comprises at least one of: a genre of the first video, an actor of the first video, a review of the first video, a rating of the first video, a content creator of the first video, a year of release of the first video, or a category of the first video ([0140-0158]). Claims 8-10 are met as previously discussed in claims 1-6. As to claims 11-16, the claimed “A system….” is composed of the same structural elements that were discussed in claims 1-6. Claim 17 is met as previously discussed in claim 7. Claims 18-20 are met as previously discussed in claims 1-6. Conclusion 4. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANNAN Q SHANG whose telephone number is (571)272-7355. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BRUCKART BENJAMIN can be reached at 571-272-3982. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANNAN Q SHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2424 ANNAN Q. SHANG
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 05, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12671858
INTERACTION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND DEVICE, COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM AND PRODUCT
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671869
DYNAMIC ADAPTATION OF INTERACTIVE VIDEO PLAYERS USING BEHAVIORAL ANALYTICS
1y 12m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666112
SYSTEMS, METHODS AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR DETECTING AND DISPLAYING SELECTABLE NETWORKED DEVICES BASED ON PROXIMITY OR SIGNAL STRENGTH
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659366
METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND MEDIA FOR SELECTING VIDEO FORMATS FOR ADAPTIVE VIDEO STREAMING
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12621512
METHOD FOR JUST-IN-TIME TRANSCODING OF BYTERANGE-ADDRESSABLE PARTS
1y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+10.8%)
3y 5m (~2y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 828 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month