Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/229,775

INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PLATFORM IMMERSIVE EXPERIENCE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 05, 2025
Priority
Oct 07, 2021 — continuation of 12/353,313
Examiner
NGUYEN, TAI T
Art Unit
2686
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Intel Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
944 granted / 1115 resolved
+22.7% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
1133
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§103
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1115 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on July 07, 2025 is being considered by the examiner. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: Applicant is required to insert the Patent Number 12,353,313 into the specification. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-2, 6-7, 10, and 21-30 arerejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. As per claims 1, 21 and 26, claim limitation " receive, via microcontroller associated with the processing circuitry, data from a computing system, the data having one or more of lighting control parameters or system data having information relating to current system conditions for associated with the computing system; generate, based on the data, control instructions for a lighting pattern for a set of lights; and provide control signals to control the set of lights.” invokes 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. However, the written description fails to disclose the corresponding structure, material, or acts for performing the entire claimed function and to clearly link the structure, material, or acts to the function. Applicant is required to clarify where the “computing device” is located? What current system condition being regarded to? Therefore, the claim is indefinite and is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. Applicant may: (a) Amend the claim so that the claim limitation will no longer be interpreted as a limitation under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph; (b) Amend the written description of the specification such that it expressly recites what structure, material, or acts perform the entire claimed function, without introducing any new matter (35 U.S.C. 132(a)); or (c) Amend the written description of the specification such that it clearly links the structure, material, or acts disclosed therein to the function recited in the claim, without introducing any new matter (35 U.S.C. 132(a)). If applicant is of the opinion that the written description of the specification already implicitly or inherently discloses the corresponding structure, material, or acts and clearly links them to the function so that one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize what structure, material, or acts perform the claimed function, applicant should clarify the record by either: (a) Amending the written description of the specification such that it expressly recites the corresponding structure, material, or acts for performing the claimed function and clearly links or associates the structure, material, or acts to the claimed function, without introducing any new matter (35 U.S.C. 132(a)); or (b) Stating on the record what the corresponding structure, material, or acts, which are implicitly or inherently set forth in the written description of the specification, perform the claimed function. For more information, see 37 CFR 1.75(d) and MPEP §§ 608.01(o) and 2181. Claims 2, 6-7, 10, 22-25, and 27-30 should have been rejected for the same reason for their dependency. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 6-7, 10, and 21-30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Laherty et al. (US 2016/0165679) As per claim 1, Laherty et al. disclose an apparatus in a form of a network lighting system (10, figure 1) comprising: processing circuitry (40) to: receive, via microcontroller (125) associated with the processing circuitry, data from a computing system (30), the data having one or more of lighting control parameters (color and brightness, see abstract and paragraph 0018); generate, based on the data, control instructions for a lighting pattern for a set of lights (135, paragraphs 0030 and 0034); and provide control signals to control the set of lights (paragraphs 0016, 0020-0021 and 0025). As per claim 2, Laherty et al. disclose the control signals being generated for performance of the lighting pattern, wherein the microcontroller comprises a special purpose microcontroller dedicated for processing relating to lighting control for a computing operation, wherein the special purpose microcontroller comprises circuitry to provide one or more algorithms to determine lighting patterns including the lighting pattern (paragraphs 0010, 0016 and 0020-0021). As per claim 6, Laherty et al. disclose the information comprises one or more of load characteristics associated with the computing system, thermal conditions associated with the computing system, or power management data associated with the computing system (paragraph 0017). As per claim 7, Laherty et al. disclose the control parameters comprise one or more of the lighting pattern or animation style, processor properties for the lighting pattern, or lighting brightness for a-the lighting pattern, wherein the lighting pattern is triggered by one or more triggering parameters, wherein the set of lights includes a set of Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs, paragraphs 0016-0018 and 0039). As per claim 10, Laherty et al. disclose the processing circuitry comprises one or more of graphics processing circuitry or application processing circuitry (paragraphs 0010 and 0016-0017). As per claim 21-30, The method claims 21-25 and their associated computer program products claims 26-30 are essentially the same in scope as system claims 1-2, 6-7 and 10 above and are rejected similarly. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TAI T. NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2961. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri: 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Quan-Zhen Wang can be reached at 571-272-3114. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TAI T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2685 October 7, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 05, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767123
METHOD, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT, PARKING ASSISTANCE SYSTEM, AND VEHICLE
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12758851
SCOREBOARD CONTROLLER
4y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12760948
ARRANGEMENT FOR REFRIGERANT LEAK MANAGEMENT
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12752848
ADAPTIVE SENSITIVITY CONTROL FOR INVOKING DISPLAY OF PARKING ASSISTANCE
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12752812
CARGO COMPARTMENT DOOR OPEN DRIVING WARNING METHOD AND DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.3%)
2y 0m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1115 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month