Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/230,310

PATIENT-MATCHED APPARATUS FOR USE IN SPINE RELATED SURGICAL PROCEDURES AND METHODS FOR USING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 06, 2025
Priority
Jun 29, 2010 — provisional 61/359,710 +22 more
Examiner
CATTUNGAL, SANJAY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Mighty Oak Medical Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
870 granted / 1042 resolved
+23.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1067
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
35.8%
-4.2% vs TC avg
§102
30.3%
-9.7% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1042 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-12, and 15-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding Claim 1, the terms “modifying the virtual model” and “altering the virtual model” are not clearly defined, its not clear what/how the virtual model is modified and how the virtual model is altered. Appropriate correction is required. Regarding Claim 15, the terms “modifying the virtual model at levels” are not clearly defined, its not clear what/how the levels are. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 a1/a2 as being anticipated by U. S. Publication No. 2007/0276501 to Betz et al. Regarding Claim 1, Betz teaches a computer-implemented method for planning patient-specific surgical correction of the spine, comprising: obtaining patient imaging data (fig. 3 and para 019-024 teaches obtaining patient image data); converting the imaging data to a 3-dimensional data set to create a virtual model (fig. 3 and para 019-024 teaches generating a 3d model) selectively modifying the virtual model to correct at least one deformity (para 0020 and 024 teaches correcting the model); selectively altering the virtual model to define a corrected virtual model (fig. 3 and para 019-024 teaches altering virtual model to corrected virtual model); and designing an implant to fit the corrected virtual model (fig. 3 and para 019-024 teaches designing implant based on corrected virtual model). Regarding Claim 2, Betz teaches that imaging data comprises at least one of synthetic CT, MRI, CT, CTA Scan, weight-bearing AlP, and/or weight-bearing lateral x-rays (para 0073 teaches CT AND MRI images). Regarding Claim 3, Betz teaches that the implant is an intervertebral cage, a pedicle screw, an intervertebral disc replacement, a sacroiliac joint fusion implant, a spinal rod, a hook, a guide, and/or a connector (para 0020teaches an intervertebral disc implant). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13 and 14 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: the closest prior art of record are U. S. Publication No. 2007/0276501 to Betz et al.; U.S. Publication No. 20180082480 to white et al.; U.S. Publication No. 2017/0312032 to Amanatullah et al.; and U.S. Publication No. 20180168740 to Ryan et al. none of the prior art alone or in combination teaches the limitations of the independent claim specifically “ identifying disease state that requires surgical correction from patient data or the virtual model; measuring a parameter from the virtual model; modifying the virtual model to define a planned correction of a deformity; verifying the planned correction is acceptable; modifying the virtual model if the planned correction is not acceptable; and designing an implant”. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SANJAY CATTUNGAL whose telephone number is (571)272-1306. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Keith Raymond can be reached at 571-270-1790. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SANJAY CATTUNGAL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3798
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 06, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745986
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CHARACTERIZATION OF A DUCTILE MEMBRANE, SURFACE AND SUB-SURFACE PROPERTIES
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745981
ULTRASOUND SYSTEM AND SIGNAL PROCESSING UNIT CONFIGURED FOR TIME GAIN AND LATERIAL GAIN COMPENSATION
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740758
ULTRASOUND 3D IMAGING SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733913
ULTRASOUND ATTENUATION COEFFICIENT ESTIMATION USING ABERRATION COMPENSATION AND REFERENCE PHANTOMS
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727949
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GUIDANCE OF INTRALUMINAL DEVICES WITHIN THE VASCULATURE
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+11.1%)
3y 1m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1042 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month