Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/230,339

SEWING MACHINE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 06, 2025
Examiner
PATEL, TAJASH D
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
1266 granted / 1567 resolved
+10.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1602
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
45.6%
+5.6% vs TC avg
§102
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1567 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 1. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 2. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, on lines 17-18 and in claim 11, on line 10, each occurrence of “the presser motor moves the presser bar from the lowered position to the normal position” and on lines 20-22 and in claim 11, on lines 16-17, each occurrence of “the sewing machine motor moves the needle bar in the upper-lower direction in a state where the presser bar is located at the normal position” is indefinite since it is unclear if the presser motor and the sewing machine motor are synced in sequence with each other, etc. to move the presser bar at the normal position? Correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter 3. Claims 1-11 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph rejection as set forth in this Office action. Claims 1 and 11 with its respective dependents are allowable because the prior art(s) of Nishimura et al.‘053 discloses first and second control accelerating/decreasing the main shaft having the needle bar and the Zheng ‘ 002 discloses a workpiece feeder module being independent from a fabric pricking spindle but the respective prior art(s) are structurally distinct and does not teach or suggest the recitation therein including a sewing machine having a controller with a sewing machine moving a needle bar from a lower needle position to an upper needle position and a presser motor moving a presser bar from a lowered position to a normal position in combination a second stitch operation in which the needle bar is moved in sequence while the presser bar is located in the normal position to prevent a sewing needle attached the needle bar from being pulled from a workpiece based on a detection result that could alter finish of the stitching thereon and between subsequent restarts of the sewing machine. Conclusion 4. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Each of the prior art references cited on PTO-892 discloses a sewing machine having a presser bar controlling position by a controller. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TEJASH PATEL whose telephone number is (571)272-4993. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9am -5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Clinton Ostrup can be reached at (571) 272-5559. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. January 8, 2026 /TAJASH D PATEL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 06, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593885
SHOCK-ABSORBING ASSEMBLY AND BODY PROTECTION DEVICE INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593881
MOLLE RETENTION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595606
TUFTING MACHINE AND METHOD OF TUFTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595607
TUFTING MACHINE AND METHOD OF TUFTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594894
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR STITCHING A THREE DIMENSIONAL FORMED COMPONENT AND COMPONENTS FORMED FROM THE METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+6.9%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1567 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month