Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/231,071

DRIVE UNIT, CHAIN CONVEYOR AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Jun 06, 2025
Priority
Jun 27, 2024 — FI 20245822
Examiner
SINGH, KAVEL
Art Unit
3651
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Raumaster Paper OY
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
1106 granted / 1322 resolved
+31.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1348
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
50.7%
+10.7% vs TC avg
§102
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§112
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1322 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 4 recites the limitation "the drive surface" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-8 and 12-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Burger U.S. Patent No. 5,174,437. Claim 1, Burger teaches a drive unit for driving a conveyor chain 2 of a chain conveyor in a longitudinal direction of the chain conveyor Abstract, wherein the drive unit Fig. 1 comprises: a drive chain 4 with an endless configuration configured to surround a first sprocket 13 arrangement with at least one first sprocket 13 and a second sprocket 13 arrangement with at least one second sprocket 13; a motor for rotating at least one of the first and second sprocket 13 arrangements at least in one rotation direction for moving the drive chain 4 in a longitudinal direction C2 L60-68; and wherein the drive chain 4 comprises several interconnected first chain links of 4 and several interconnected second chain links of 4 (known in roller chain conveyor assemblies) which are located at a transverse distance from each other Fig. 1; and wherein the first and second chain links comprise several chain pins of 4 (known in roller chain conveyor assemblies) connecting the successive first chain links together and the successive second chain links together C2 L60-65; a plurality of guide rolls 4’ supported rotatably to the first and second chain links by means of the chain pins Fig. 1; and wherein the drive chain 4 further comprises several drive teeth of 13 protruding outwardly from the drive chain 4 and comprising curved drive surfaces of 4 for transmitting driving forces from the drive unit to the conveyor chain 2; wherein each of the first and second chain links of 4 comprises, in the longitudinal direction of the drive chain 4, a middle point which is located between transverse central axis of the chain pins of 4 (known in roller chain conveyor assemblies); and wherein each curved drive surface of 4’ comprises a center of curvature and the center of curvature is located away from the middle point a longitudinal distance towards the central axis of the chain pins of 4 C5 L15-30. Claim 2, Burger teaches the centers of curvature are located in vertical alignment with the central axis of the chain pins when examined in the longitudinal direction of the drive chain 4 Fig. 2. Claim 3, Burger teaches the centers of curvature are located at shorter longitudinal distances from the central axis of the chain pins of 4 compared to longitudinal distances from the middle points Fig. 2. Claim 4, Burger teaches the drive teeth of 13 comprise side surfaces limiting outermost surfaces in the longitudinal direction of the drive chain 4 and wherein the drive surfaces of 4’ are located only on the side surfaces of the drive teeth of 13 Fig. 1. Claim 5, Burger teaches each drive tooth of 13 comprises a top of tooth of 13 which is without any drive surface of 4,4’ providing tooth contact between the drive chain 4 and the conveyor chain 2 Fig. 13. Claim 6, Burger teaches each drive surface of 4 has a shape of a quadrant Fig. 2. Claim 7, Burger teaches each drive tooth of 13 comprises two drive surfaces of 13 provided on opposite outermost side surfaces whereby the drive tooth of 13 comprises the drive surfaces of 4,4’ facing towards a conveying direction of travel and towards an opposing reversing direction of travel Figs. 1-2. Claim 8, Burger teaches the drive unit comprises a guide arrangement 8 for directing the drive teeth of 13 into contact with the conveyor chain 2 and for directing the drive teeth of 13 apart from the conveyor chain 2. Claim 12, Burger teaches the chain conveyor 2 is a slat conveyor 1’ comprising a plurality of transverse slats 1’ on outer surface of the conveyor chain assembly 2,4 for supporting the objects to be conveyed Fig. 1. Claim 13, Burger teaches a method for operating a chain conveyor 2, the method comprising: transporting objects or material on an endless conveyor chain assembly 2,4 of the chain conveyor 2 Abstract; driving the conveyor chain assembly 2,4 in a longitudinal direction by means of a drive unit comprising a drive chain 4 arranged inside the endless conveyor chain assembly 2,4 and comprising a plurality of drive teeth of 13 on an outer surface of the drive chain 4; moving the conveyor chain assembly 2,4 on a first strand constituting a material-transport strand, and on a second strand constituting a return strand oppositely-moving to the first strand guiding curved drive surfaces of the drive teeth of 13 into engagement with the return strand of the conveyor chain assembly 2,4 at a limited drive section inside the endless conveyor chain assembly 2,4 Figs. 1-2; and transmitting driving forces from leading edge surfaces of the drive teeth of 13 to the conveyor chain assembly 2,4 C5 L15-30. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 9 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Burger U.S. Patent No. 5,174,437 in view of Kissee U.S. Patent No. 5,303,817. Claim 9, Burger teaches a plurality of support rolls 4’ mounted to the conveyor chains 2,4 for supporting the conveyor chain assembly 2,4 to support surfaces of the body below the first strand Fig. 1; and a drive unit for driving the conveyor chain assembly 2,4 in the longitudinal direction; wherein the drive unit is in accordance with claim 1 Abstract; and wherein the drive chain of the drive unit is located inside a closed loop configuration of the endless conveyor chain assembly; and wherein the protruding drive teeth of 13 on the outer surface of the drive chain 4 are in engagement with the conveyor chain assembly 2,4 at a limited drive section on an inner surface side of the return strand of the conveyor chain assembly C5 L15-30, but does not teach as Kissee teaches a chain conveyor 15 for conveying objects Abstract and comprising: a body Fig. 2; a conveyor chain assembly 15,22 provided with a pair of endless conveyor chains 15,22 arranged parallel in a longitudinal direction of the conveyor Fig. 2; a first idler sprocket assembly 23 and second idler sprocket assembly 23 around which the conveyor chains 15,22 are supported for moving the conveyor chain assembly 15,22 on a first strand constituting a material-transport strand, and on a second strand constituting a return strand oppositely-moving to the first strand Fig. 2. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to combine the transport disclosed in Burger with the sprocket configuration taught in Kissee with a reasonable expectation of success because Claim 11, Burger teaches the protruding drive teeth of 13 the drive chain 4 are in engagement with the support rollers 4’ of the conveyor chain 2 at the drive section Fig. 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 10 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAVEL SINGH whose telephone number is (571)272-2362. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 8am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gene Crawford can be reached at (571) 272-6911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAVEL SINGH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3651 KS
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 06, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12722901
CONVEYOR COMPONENT WITH FLEXIBLE HUB AND CONVEYOR ASSEMBLY
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12723623
BEARING POSITIONING STRUCTURE WITHOUT RADIAL INTERFERENCE FIT
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12715699
IFLEX CONVEYOR SYSTEM WITH GAPPING CAPABILITY FOR EFFICIENT PRODUCT TRANSFER HAVING RIVETED X-BRACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12715698
TRANSFER TABLE
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12715711
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSISTING IN OBJECT GRASPING FROM CONTAINERS IN OBJECT PROCESSING SYSTEMS
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 2m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1322 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month