Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/232,333

METHOD AND CONTROL CIRCUITRY FOR DISPLAYING INFORMATION ON A HEAD-UP DISPLAY

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jun 09, 2025
Priority
Jun 28, 2024 — EU 24185324.1
Examiner
BODDIE, WILLIAM
Art Unit
2623
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Harman International Industries Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Final)
28%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 8m
Est. Remaining
52%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 28% of cases
28%
Career Allowance Rate
55 granted / 199 resolved
-34.4% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 10m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
237
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
88.1%
+48.1% vs TC avg
§102
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 199 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment 2. The amendment filed on 03/27/2026 has been entered and considered by examiner. Claim Objections 3. Claim 15 is objected to because of the following informalities: In line 2 of claim 15: “… of claim 14, …” should be changed into --… of claim 14; …--; and In line 3 of claim 15: “… the head-up display, and …” should be changed into --… the head-up display; and …--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 4. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 5. Claims 1-2, 4-5, 7-9, 11-17 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Madau (U.S. Pub. No. US 2013/0097557 A1). As to claim 1, Madau (Figs. 1-23) teaches a method of displaying information (information displayed by each of the menus 28a, 28b, and 28c; [0043], lines 7-8; Figs. 1-2) on a head-up display (a display component 15 which is a heads-up display (HUD); [0043], lines 1-2; Figs. 1-2) of a vehicle (a vehicle 11), wherein a control circuitry (a processor 14 which is complex set of electronic, logic circuitry) is coupled to the head-up display (a display component 15 which is a heads-up display (HUD)), (Fig. 2), the method comprising: determining a direction of gaze (determining a gaze vector) of a driver (a user) of the vehicle (the vehicle 11) (Fig. 1 and 204 of Fig. 8); selecting a display mode (a mode in Fig. 6 or an alternate mode in Fig. 7) from a group of display modes (the mode in Fig. 6 and the alternate mode in Fig. 7) based on the direction of gaze (the gaze vector) (Fig. 1 and 208 of Fig. 8), each display mode of the group of display modes (the mode in Fig. 6 and the alternate mode in Fig. 7) defining information ((fuel gauge graphic information, Range), ((turn left, turn direction, est. arrival) and road graphic information), (NW, MPH, and RPM)) to be displayed on the head-up display (the heads-up display (HUD)), wherein the group of display modes the mode in Fig. 6 and the alternate mode in Fig. 7) comprises at least a normal mode (a mode in Fig. 6) and an extended mode (an alternate mode in Fig. 7), wherein information ((turn left, turn direction, est. arrival), graphic information, trip time, and a circle gauge in 28b) displayed in the extended mode the alternate mode in Fig. 7) differs from information ((turn left, turn direction, est. arrival), and graphic information) displayed in the normal mode (the mode in Fig. 6), and wherein a display area (a menu system 26) used by the head-up display (the heads-up display (HUD)) on a front windshield (a front windshield) of the vehicle (the vehicle 12) is the same (28a, 28b, and 28c in Figs. 6 and 7) for all display modes of the group of display modes (the mode in Fig. 6 and the alternate mode in Fig. 7); and displaying the information (28a, 28b, and 28c) on the head-up display (the heads-up display (HUD)) according to the selected display mode (the mode in Fig. 6 or the alternate mode in Fig. 7) (Figs. 6-7). As to claim 2, Madau teaches the method of claim 1, wherein an amount of information (information in 28b, e.g., trip time and a circle gauge) displayed in the extended mode (the alternate mode in Fig. 7) is greater than an amount of information (information in 28b) displayed in the normal mode (the mode in Fig. 6) (Figs. 6-7). As to claim 4, Madau teaches the method of claim 1, wherein at least one piece of information (28b), which is to be displayed in the normal mode (the mode in Fig. 6) and in the extended mode (the alternate mode in Fig. 7), is displayed as a graphical representation (a fuel gauge) in the normal mode (the mode in Fig. 6) and as a textual representation (Range 100mi) in the extended mode (the alternate mode in Fig. 7) (Figs. 6-7). As to claim 5, Madau teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the extended mode (the alternate mode in Fig. 7) is selected when the direction of gaze (the gaze vector; the field of focus) falls on a display area (a menu system 26) used by the head-up display (the heads-up display (HUD)) on the front windshield (a front windshield) of the vehicle (the vehicle 12) (Fig. 7). As to claim 7, Madau teaches the method of claim 1 further comprising: determining a focal plane (a field of focus) of a driver's gaze (a user’s gaze) (204 and 206 of Fig. 8); and selecting the display mode (the mode in Fig. 6 or the alternate mode in Fig. 7) from the group of display modes (the mode in Fig. 6 and the alternate mode in Fig. 7) additionally based on the focal plane (the field of focus) (Figs. 6-8). As to claim 8, Madau teaches the method of claim 7, wherein the extended mode (the alternate mode in Fig. 7) is selected when the focal plane (the field of focus) of the gaze of the driver (the user’s gaze) coincides with a plane of a display area (a menu system 26) used by the head-up display (the heads-up display (HUD)) on the front windshield (a front windshield) of the vehicle (the vehicle 12) (Fig. 7). As to claim 9, Madau teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the extended mode (the alternate mode in Fig. 7) is selected when the direction of gaze (the gaze vector; the field of focus) falls on a specific area (a menu system 26) on the front windshield (a front windshield) of the vehicle (the vehicle 12), at least one of a size and position (the third position) of the specific area (the menu system 26) being configurable by the driver (the user) (Fig. 7). As to claim 11, Madau teaches the method of claim 1, wherein at least one piece of information (turn left), which is to be displayed in the normal mode (the mode in Fig. 6) and in the extended mode (the alternate mode in Fig. 7), is displayed in the normal mode (the mode in Fig. 6) at a lower position in the vertical direction of the vehicle (the vehicle 12) than in the extended mode (the alternate mode in Fig. 7) (Figs. 6-7). As to claim 12, Madau teaches the method of claim 1, wherein determining the direction of gaze of the driver comprises: capturing at least one image of a driver's face with a camera of the vehicle (the at least one sensor 12 is a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) camera for capturing an image of at least a portion of a head (e.g. face or eyes) of the user; [0035], lines 4-8); and determining the direction of gaze of the driver based on processing the at least one image (the at least one sensor 12 is a user tracking device capable of detecting a vision characteristic of a face or head of a user (e.g. a head pose, a gaze vector or direction, a facial feature, and the like; generating a sensor signal representing the image; [0035], lines 1-4 and 8). As to claim 13, Madau teaches the control circuity (a processor 14 which is complex set of electronic, logic circuitry) for executing the method of claim 1 (Fig. 2). As to claim 14, Madau (Figs. 1-23) teaches an apparatus (an adaptive display system 10; Figs. 1-2) including control circuitry (a processor 14 which is complex set of electronic, logic circuitry and display components 16, 16’, 16”) for a head-up display (a display component 15 which is a heads-up display (HUD)) of a vehicle (a vehicle 11) (Figs. 1-2), the control circuitry (the processor 14 and the display components 16, 16’, 16”) comprising: at least one interface (display components 16, 16’, 16”) for controlling the head-up display (the display component 15 which is the heads-up display (HUD)) and receiving data (a sensor signal) from which a direction of gaze (a gaze vector) of a driver (a user) of the vehicle (the vehicle 11) can be determined (Fig. 1-2 and 204 of Fig. 8), wherein the control circuitry (the processor 14 and the display components 16, 16’, 16”) is configured to: determine the direction of gaze of the driver of the vehicle based on the received data (the at least one sensor 12 is a user tracking device capable of detecting a vision characteristic of a face or head of a user (e.g. a head pose, a gaze vector or direction, a facial feature, and the like; generating a sensor signal representing the image; [0035], lines 1-4 and 8); select a display mode (a mode in Fig. 6 or an alternate mode in Fig. 7) from a group of display modes (the mode in Fig. 6 and the alternate mode in Fig. 7) based on the direction of gaze (the gaze vector) (Fig. 1 and 208 of Fig. 8), each display mode of the group of display modes (the mode in Fig. 6 and the alternate mode in Fig. 7) defining information ((fuel gauge graphic information, Range), ((turn left, turn direction, est. arrival) and road graphic information), (NW, MPH, and RPM)) to be displayed on the head-up display (the heads-up display (HUD)), wherein the group of display modes (the mode in Fig. 6 and the alternate mode in Fig. 7) comprises at least a normal mode (the mode in Fig. 6) and an extended mode (the alternate mode in Fig. 7), wherein information ((turn left, turn direction, est. arrival), graphic information, trip time, and a circle gauge in 28b) displayed in the extended mode (the alternate mode in Fig. 7) differs from information ((turn left, turn direction, est. arrival), and graphic information) displayed in the normal mode (the mode in Fig. 6) (Figs. 6-7), and wherein a display area (a menu system 26) used by the head-up display (the heads-up display (HUD)) on a front windshield (a front windshield) of the vehicle (the vehicle 12) is the same (28a, 28b, and 28c in Figs. 6 and 7) for all display modes of the group of display modes (the mode in Fig. 6 and the alternate mode in Fig. 7) (Figs. 6-7); and control the head-up display (the heads-up display (HUD)) to display the information ((fuel gauge graphic information, Range), (NW, MPH, and RPM), ((turn left, turn direction, est. arrival) and road graphic information)) on the head-up display (the heads-up display (HUD)) according to the selected display mode (the mode in Fig. 6 or the alternate mode in Fig. 7) (Figs. 6-7). As to claim 15, Madau teaches the vehicle comprising: the control circuitry (the processor 14 and the display components 16, 16’, 16”) of claim 14, the head-up display (the heads-up display (HUD)), and a camera (a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) camera) configured to capture at least one image of the face of the driver of the vehicle as the data (capturing an image of at least a portion of a head (e.g. face or eyes) of the user) from which the direction of gaze (a gaze vector) of the driver (the user) of the vehicle (the vehicle 11) can be determined ([0035], lines 1-8). As to claim 16, Madau (Figs. 1-23) teaches a method of displaying information (information displayed by each of the menus 28a, 28b, and 28c; [0043], lines 7-8; Figs. 1-2) on a head-up display (a display component 15 which is a heads-up display (HUD); [0043], lines 1-2; Figs. 1-2) of a vehicle (a vehicle 11), the method comprising: determining a direction of gaze (determining a gaze vector) of a driver (a user) of the vehicle (the vehicle 11) (Fig. 1 and 204 of Fig. 8); selecting a display mode (a mode in Fig. 6 or an alternate mode in Fig. 7) from a group of display modes (the mode in Fig. 6 and the alternate mode in Fig. 7) based on the direction of gaze (the gaze vector) (Fig. 1 and 208 of Fig. 8), each display mode of the group of display modes (the mode in Fig. 6 and the alternate mode in Fig. 7) defining information ((fuel gauge graphic information, Range), ((turn left, turn direction, est. arrival) and road graphic information), (NW, MPH, and RPM)) to be displayed on the head-up display (the heads-up display (HUD)), wherein the group of display modes (the mode in Fig. 6 and the alternate mode in Fig. 7) comprises at least a first mode (the mode in Fig. 6) and an second mode (the alternate mode in Fig. 7), wherein information ((turn left, turn direction, est. arrival), graphic information, trip time, and a circle gauge in 28b) displayed in the second mode (the alternate mode in Fig. 7) differs from information ((turn left, turn direction, est. arrival), and graphic information) displayed in the first mode (the mode in Fig. 6) (Figs. 6-7), and wherein a display area (a menu system 26) used by the head-up display (the heads-up display (HUD)) on a front windshield (a front windshield) of the vehicle (the vehicle 12) is the same (28a, 28b, and 28c in Figs. 6 and 7) for all display modes of the group of display modes (the mode in Fig. 6 and the alternate mode in Fig. 7) (Figs. 6-7); and displaying the information (28a, 28b, and 28c) on the head-up display (the heads-up display (HUD)) according to the selected display mode (the mode in Fig. 6 or the alternate mode in Fig. 7) (Figs. 6-7). As to claim 17, Madau teaches the method of claim 16, wherein an amount of information (information in 28b, e.g., trip time and a circle gauge) displayed in the second mode (the alternate mode in Fig. 7) is greater than an amount of information (information in 28b) displayed in the first mode (the mode in Fig. 6) (Figs. 6-7). As to claim 19, Madau teaches the method of claim 16, wherein at least one piece of information (28b), which is to be displayed in the normal mode (the mode in Fig. 6) and in the second mode (the alternate mode in Fig. 7), is displayed as a graphical representation (a fuel gauge) in the first mode (the mode in Fig. 6) and as a textual representation (Range 100mi) in the second mode (the alternate mode in Fig. 7) (Figs. 6-7). As to claim 20, Madau teaches the method of claim 16, wherein the second mode (the alternate mode in Fig. 7) is selected when the direction of gaze (the gaze vector; the field of focus) falls on the display area (the menu system 26) used by the head-up display (the heads-up display (HUD)) on a front windshield (a front windshield) of the vehicle (the vehicle 12) (Fig. 7). Allowable Subject Matter 6. Claims 6 and 10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments 7. Applicant's arguments filed on 03/27/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that Madau does not disclose or suggest “wherein a display area used by the head-up display on a front windshield of the vehicle is the same for all display modes of the group of display modes.” However, the Office respectfully disagrees. Reconsidering the reference, Madau, Figs. 6-7 teaches the limitation as recited above by the Applicant. The reference Madau (Figs. 6-7) is used to reject the limitation. Therefore, the Office maintains the rejections as recited above. Conclusion 8. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Inquiry 9. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kwang-Su Yang whose telephone number is (571)270-7307. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri during 9:00am-6:00pm EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chanh Nguyen, can be reached on (571)272-7772. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /KWANG-SU YANG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2623
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 09, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 27, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667747
TRAMPOLINE AND SPORTS DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12669864
HEAD PROPERTY DETECTION IN DISPLAY-ENABLED WEARABLE DEVICES
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12670824
PIXEL STRUCTURE, DRIVING METHOD AND DISPLAY SUBSTRATE
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12664926
DISPLAY DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658096
DISPLAY MODULE AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
28%
Grant Probability
52%
With Interview (+23.9%)
4y 10m (~3y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 199 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month