Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 19/232,567

SECURITY SCHEME FOR IDENTIFICATION TAGS

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jun 09, 2025
Priority
Dec 05, 2022 — continuation of 12/346,761
Examiner
MORTELL, JOHN F
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
United Parcel Service of America Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
571 granted / 852 resolved
+7.0% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
866
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
61.1%
+21.1% vs TC avg
§102
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
§112
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 852 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Application 2. This application, filed June 9, 2025, is a continuation of U.S. Patent Application No. US 18/075,287, filed December 5, 2022, which issued as U.S. Patent No. US 12,346,761 B2 on July 1, 2025. Claims 1-20 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 3. 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. 4. Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim does not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because claim 15, recites, in relevant part, “one or more computer storage media storing computer-usable instructions that, when used by the at least one computer processor, cause the at least one computer processor to perform operations ….” Regarding computer storage media, the applicant’s specification discloses that “[a]n apparatus or system may include a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium …. Such non-transitory computer-readable storage media include all computer-readable media (including volatile and non-volatile media).” ([0054]) The specification further discloses that “where embodiments are described to use a computer-readable storage medium, other types of computer-readable storage media may be substituted for or used in addition to the computer-readable storage media described above.” ([0056]) The above-quoted passages from the applicant’s specification show that although the applicant’s system “may” include non-transitory computer-readable storage media, the computer readable storage media is not limited to non-transitory computer-readable storage media. On the contrary, the specification places no limit on what type of storage media may be used in the system: “[s]uch non-transitory computer-readable storage media include all computer-readable media (including volatile and non-volatile media)” … “other types of computer-readable storage media may be substituted for or used in addition to the computer-readable storage media described above.” For these reasons, the claim limitation, “one or more computer storage media storing computer-usable instructions” comprises “all computer-readable media.” The category of all computer-readable media comprises electromagnetic radiation modulated with computer-readable digital code, which constitutes a signal, but signals are per se non-statutory subject matter. Allowable Subject Matter 5. Claim 15 is objected to as being rejected under Section 101 but would be allowable if amended to avoid the Section 101 rejection without materially changing the scope of the claim. Claims 16-20 are objected to for the same reasons as claim 15 because claims 16-20 depend from claim 15. 6. Claims 1 and 8 and claims 2-7 and 9-14, which depend from claims 1 and 8, respectively, allowed. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion 7. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN F MORTELL whose telephone number is (571)270-1873. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 10-7 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Davetta Goins can be reached at 571-272-2957. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN F MORTELL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2689
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 09, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12688775
PARKING SPACE MANAGEMENT METHOD AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12682751
PROTECTED TURNS
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676065
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VEHICLE-TO-VEHICLE OPEN PARKING SPOTLIGHT
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12657977
LOCKER FOR MANAGING ACCESS TO DEVICES
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658976
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING SHORT-RANGE WIRELESS READ OF CONTACTLESS CARDS USING VIDEO SIGNAL
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+25.7%)
2y 6m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 852 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month