Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/233,167

BREECH ASSEMBLY FOR A GUN AND METHOD FOR CHECKING THE FLUID LEVEL IN THE RECOIL DAMPING SYSTEM OF SUCH A BREECH ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 10, 2025
Priority
Jun 12, 2024 — FR 2406156
Examiner
LEE, BENJAMIN P
Art Unit
3641
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Knds France
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
1008 granted / 1260 resolved
+28.0% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1279
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
77.7%
+37.7% vs TC avg
§102
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1260 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The IDS document submitted 6/10/2025 is acknowledged and has been considered. Drawings The drawings submitted 6/10/2025 are acknowledged and acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 13 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 13 and 15 recite the limitation "the filling port" in lines 1 and 4 respectively. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-12 and 14 are allowed. Claims 13 and 15 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: With respect to claim 1, the closest prior art fails to teach or make obvious, including all the limitations of claim 1, a fluid level indicator mounted movable in axial translation relative to the breech ring and the opening opens into a viewing means for viewing the axial position of the indicator. Summary/Conclusion Claims 1-12 and 14 are allowable and claims 13 and 15 are rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN P LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-8968. The examiner can normally be reached between the hours of 8:30am and 5:00pm on Monday through Friday. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Troy Chambers can be reached on 571-272-6874. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /BENJAMIN P LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 10, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637215
DRONE-BASED PAYLOAD MANAGEMENT
1y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631425
HYBRID PAD SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631415
3D-PRINTED SUPPORT STRUCTURES FOR SOUND SUPPRESSORS
2y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12617525
DRIVE UNIT FOR A ROTARY-WING AIRCRAFT, AND ROTARY-WING AIRCRAFT
3y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12611733
LASER SCRIBING DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+17.0%)
2y 5m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1260 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month