Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/234,529

LENS DRIVING DEVICE, CAMERA MODULE AND OPTICAL DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 11, 2025
Priority
Jul 13, 2020 — RE 10-2020-0086280 +3 more
Examiner
GARCES-RIVERA, ANGEL L
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LG Innotek Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
12m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
518 granted / 635 resolved
+21.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
654
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§103
43.9%
+3.9% vs TC avg
§102
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
§112
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 635 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by IDS provided reference US 2012/0106936 to Lim et al. (hereinafter Lim). Regarding independent claim 20, Lim teaches a camera device comprising: a housing (housing 120, see Fig. 1); a bobbin disposed in the housing (bobbin 131, see Fig. 1); a coil and a magnet configured to move the bobbin in an optical axis direction (coil 121 and magnet 140 move the bobbin 131 in the optical axis direction, see par. [0049]); and a support member connecting the housing and the bobbin (fixed suspension wire 150 connects the housing 120 and the bobbin 131, see par. [0053]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 10 and 18-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lim in view of US 2020/0386968 to Uno et al. (hereinafter Uno). Regarding independent claim 1, Lim teaches a camera device comprising: a housing (housing 120, see Fig. 1); a bobbin disposed in the housing (bobbin 131, see Fig. 1); a coil and a magnet configured to move the bobbin in an optical axis direction (coil 121 and magnet 140 move the bobbin 131 in the optical axis direction, see par. [0049]); and a support member connecting the housing and the bobbin (fixed suspension wire 150 connects the housing 120 and the bobbin 131, see par. [0053]), But Lim fails to clearly specify “wherein the bobbin comprises a groove formed on an outer surface of the bobbin, and wherein the support member comprises a first fixed portion fixed in the groove of the bobbin”. However, Uno teaches a lens position adjustment device of a camera module “wherein the bobbin comprises a groove formed on an outer surface of the bobbin (lens holder 102 comprises two arms 218 and 220 with groove formed on an outer surface, see Figs. 2, 3A and 5 and par. [0048]), and wherein the support member comprises a first fixed portion fixed in the groove of the bobbin (ball support members 226 and 228 extend inward from an inner wall of the housing 202, ball 214 and 216 are fixed in the groove of arms 218 and 220, see par. [0048-0049] and Figs. 2, 3A and 5)”. References are analogous art because they are from the same field of endeavor and/or are reasonably pertinent to the particular problem with which the applicant was concerned because they relate to camera modules. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the above camera module as taught by Lim, by incorporating the components as taught by Uno. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to do this modification in order to enable the lens holder 224 to be capable of moving in a Z-axis direction, which extends along the optical axis, as it is guided by the balls 214 and 216 as suggested by Uno (see par. [0049]). Regarding claim 10, Lim in view of Uno teaches the camera device of claim 1, wherein the magnet is disposed on the bobbin (magnet 140 disposed on the bobbin 130, see Lim Fig. 2), and wherein the coil is disposed on the housing (coil 121 disposed on the housing 120, see Lim Fig. 2). Regarding claim 18, Lim in view of Uno teaches an optical device comprising: a main body (smartphone, see Uno par. [0003]); the camera device of claim 1 disposed on the main body (camara incorporated in a smartphone, see Uno par. [0003]); and a display disposed on the main body and outputting an image photographed by the camera device (implied component in the smartphone, see Uno par. [0003]). Regarding independent claim 19, Lim teaches a camera device comprising: a housing (housing 120, see Fig. 1); a bobbin disposed in the housing (bobbin 131, see Fig. 1); a coil and a magnet configured to move the bobbin in an optical axis direction (coil 121 and magnet 140 move the bobbin 131 in the optical axis direction, see par. [0049]); and a support member connecting the housing and the bobbin (fixed suspension wire 150 connects the housing 120 and the bobbin 131, see par. [0053]), But, Lim fails to clearly specify “wherein a groove is formed on at least one of an outer surface of the bobbin and an inner surface of the housing, and wherein the support member comprises a fixed portion fixed in the groove”. However, Uno teaches a lens position adjustment device of a camera module “wherein a groove is formed on at least one of an outer surface of the bobbin and an inner surface of the housing (lens holder 102 comprises two arms 218 and 220 with groove formed on an outer surface, see Figs. 2, 3A and 5 and par. [0048]), and wherein the support member comprises a first fixed portion fixed in the groove (ball support members 226 and 228 extend inward from an inner wall of the housing 202, ball 214 and 216 are fixed in the groove of arms 218 and 220, see par. [0048-0049] and Figs. 2, 3A and 5)”. References are analogous art because they are from the same field of endeavor and/or are reasonably pertinent to the particular problem with which the applicant was concerned because they relate to camera modules. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the above camera module as taught by Lim, by incorporating the components as taught by Uno. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to do this modification in order to enable the lens holder 224 to be capable of moving in a Z-axis direction, which extends along the optical axis, as it is guided by the balls 214 and 216 as suggested by Uno (see par. [0049]). Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 2-9 and 11-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANGEL L GARCES-RIVERA whose telephone number is (571)270-7268. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9AM-5PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sinh Tran can be reached at 571-727-7564. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANGEL L GARCES-RIVERA/ Examiner, Art Unit 2637 /SINH TRAN/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 11, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750592
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD THEREOF, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750593
DEPTH-BASED AUTO-EXPOSURE MANAGEMENT
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12731359
INTELLIGENT CAMERA ILLUMINATION AND PROJECTOR
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726713
CAMERA CONTROL DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND CAMERA CONTROL METHOD
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12713721
IMAGING DEVICE
4y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+10.5%)
2y 3m (~12m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 635 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month