Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/236,376

MULTICORE CABLE ASSEMBLY MANUFACTURING METHOD, MULTICORE CABLE ASSEMBLY MANUFACTURING APPARATUS, AND STRANDING MACHINE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 12, 2025
Examiner
MARIN, DAKOTA
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Proterial Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allow Rate
125 granted / 239 resolved
-17.7% vs TC avg
Strong +60% interview lift
Without
With
+59.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
266
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
43.3%
+3.3% vs TC avg
§102
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
§112
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 239 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. DETAILED ACTION This is in response to the claims filed June 12, 2025, in which claims 1-5 were presented for examination, of which claims 4-5 were withdrawn, due to Restriction Requirement dated December 23, 2025. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Claims 1-3 in the reply filed on February 19, 2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Andersen et al. “Andersen” (US PG Pub. 2005/0015978) in view of Felix et al. “Felix” (US PG Pub. 2015/0082623). Regarding claim 1, Andersen discloses a method for manufacturing a multicore cable assembly (Abstract), comprising: a stranding step of stranding the plurality of insulated wires into a spiral shape (Par. 0033, as shown in Fig. 2). Andersen does not disclose a stripping step and a connecting step. However, Felix teaches yet another cable assembly, wherein Felix teaches a method that includes one ends of a plurality of spirally twisted insulated wires are connected to a plurality of electrodes of a board (Par. 0054 and 0059, as shown in diagram Fig. 16), comprising: a stripping step of removing an insulating coating at each of the one ends of the plurality of insulated wires to expose a core wire (Par. 0075, lines: 1-5, step 96 in Fig. 16); a connecting step of connecting the core wires at the one ends of the plurality of insulated wires to the plurality of electrodes of the board after the stripping step (Par. 0076, step 100 in Fig. 16). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the method of manufacturing as disclosed by Andersen, by incorporating a plurality of electrodes of a board, a stripping and connecting step as taught by Felix, in order to enhance the structural integrity of the cable assembly, wherein with this combination the stranding step disclosed by Andersen would come after the connecting step taught by Felix. Regarding claim 2, Andersen in view of Felix disclose wherein the stranding step comprises a step of stranding together the plurality of insulated wires while suppressing a residual twist of each of the plurality of insulated wires (Par. 0039 of Andersen, examiner notes “suppressing a residual twist” is shown at plate 66 of Fig. 2). Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Andersen in view of Felix, further in view of Bueno et al. “Bueno” (US PG Pub. 2016/0168786). Regarding claim 3, Andersen in view of Felix disclose wherein the stranding step comprises a step of stranding the plurality of insulated wires by using a rotating body (12, Par. 0040) in which a plurality of tubular elements (24B’, 24B’’, 24B’’’, Fig. 2) are arranged along a circumferential direction centering on a rotation axis (axis of 54, Par. 0035 and 0040, examiner notes rotation occurs at the arrow shown in Fig. 2, due to rotating body 12). They do not disclose suctioning. However, Bueno teaches yet another method for manufacturing cables, wherein Bueno teaches suctioning each of a plurality of drawn members (52, Fig. 4) fixed on the other end of each of the plurality of wires (13, 13’, Par. 0092). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the stranding step as disclosed by Andersen in view of Felix, by incorporating suctioning as taught by Bueno, in order to enhance the structural integrity of the produced cable assembly. Examiner notes with this combination “rotating of the rotating body while suctioning each of a plurality of drawn members fixed on the other end of each of the plurality of insulated wires inside each of the plurality of tubular elements” is accomplished, due to the step of suctioning being added to the part of rotating the rotating body with a plurality of tubular elements, which was disclosed by Andersen in view of Felix. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent (See PTO-892) to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAKOTA MARIN whose telephone number is (571)272-3529. The examiner can normally be reached Mon.-Fri., 9:00AM-6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ALISSA TOMPKINS can be reached at (571) 272-3425. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAKOTA MARIN/Examiner, Art Unit 3732 /ALISSA J TOMPKINS/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 12, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599813
SWIM CAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595600
METHOD OF KNITTING WARP KNITTED FABRIC AND WARP KNITTING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594484
MIXED MARTIAL ARTS EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590389
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING KNIT ARTICLES INCORPORATING REFLECTIVE YARN AND KNIT ARTICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12544602
FIREFIGHTER PROTECTIVE HOOD AND GLOVES WITH REGENERATED CELLULOSE FIBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+59.8%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 239 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month