Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/238,074

Computer and Network Interface Controller Securely Offloading Encryption Keys and Underlay IPsec Encryption Processing to the Network Interface Controller

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jun 13, 2025
Priority
Jun 13, 2022 — provisional 63/366,283 +1 more
Examiner
STEINLE, ANDREW J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Dreambig Semiconductor Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
495 granted / 565 resolved
+27.6% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
573
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
§103
49.0%
+9.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 565 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 2-19 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over Claims 1-18 of U.S. Patent 12,341,873. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because aside from a few minor differences, these claims contain the same limitations and perform the same functions. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-19 would be in condition for allowance if the Double Patenting rejection was obviated. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding Claims 1, 8, and 14, the closest prior art of record, Kida et al., (US 20220103536 A1), Niell et al., (US 20210150074 A1), Mundt et al., (US 20210226935 A1) teaches the environment utilizing an overlay software defined network (SDN), the computer system comprising: a computer including: a computer processor; a memory controller coupled to the computer processor; computer memory coupled to the computer processor and the memory controller; a computer peripheral device interface coupled to the computer processor and to the computer memory; and computer non-transitory storage for programs to execute from computer memory on the computer processor, wherein the computer processor and the memory controller are configured to provide secure memory areas within the computer memory and session encryption key storage for encryption keys used for IPsec communications between a local program and a remote program over a network within the secure memory areas; wherein the computer processor is configured to execute programs from secure memory areas; wherein the computer non-transitory storage includes a local program to be executed from a secure memory area, wherein the local program is configured to operate with data stored within the secure memory area, wherein the local program is configured for communicating data contained in the secure memory area to a remote computer over a network according to an IPsec protocol; and a network interface controller (NIC) for connection to the computer and the network, the NIC including: a NIC peripheral device interface for connection to the computer; a network interface for connection to the network; and wherein the NIC stores communication data in transit and session encryption keys used for the communications between the local program and the remote program over the network, wherein the NIC is configured to encrypt data packets leaving the NIC through the network interface and decrypt data packets entering the NIC through the network interface using the stored session encryption keys, wherein the local program and the NIC are configured to exchange security associations (SAs). However, the references do not explicitly teach nor suggest in detail, A computer system for operating in an environment having an underlay cloud physical network, an environment SDN domain coupled to the network interface, wherein the environment SDN domain does not have access to communication data in transit and the stored session encryption keys, wherein the environment SDN domain stores a table of packet headers used by the underlay cloud physical network and other underlay cloud physical network information, wherein the environment SDN domain determines underlay cloud physical network headers appropriate for a data packet, wherein the local program is configured to provide a local session primary encryption key to the NIC, wherein the local program is configured to request at least one of a local SA or IPsec transforms and additional attributes from the NIC, wherein the NIC is configured to request a virtual network identifier (VNI) and underlay source and destination IP mapping for an overlay source and destination IP from the environment SDN domain, wherein, when the local program is configured to request a local SA, the NIC is configured to develop a local SA, the local SA including a local derived session encryption key developed using the local session primary encryption key and at least one field contained in the packets being exchanged, after receiving the VNI and underlay source and destination IP mapping from the environment SDN domain, including selecting a Security Parameter Index (SPI) for the local program, and to provide the local SA to the local program, wherein, when the local program is configured to request IPsec transforms and additional attributes, the local program is configured to develop a local SA including selecting an SPI, a local derived session encryption key developed using the local session primary encryption key and at least one field contained in the packets being exchanged and elements from the requested IPsec transforms and additional attributes, wherein the local program is configured to exchange CREATE_CHILD_SA requests with the remote program to exchange SAs including local and remote derived session encryption keys with the remote program, wherein the local program is configured to provide the local SA and the remote SA including the remote derived session encryption key to the NIC, wherein the NIC is configured to use the remote SA to encrypt egress packets using the remote derived session encryption key and decrypt ingress packets using a local derived session encryption key developed using the local session primary encryption key and at least one field contained in the packets being exchanged with the remote program in underlay transmissions and receptions, wherein the local program is configured to direct provision of a data packet to the NIC for transmission in packets to the remote program, wherein the NIC is configured to transfer data packet header information to the environment SDN domain to allow the environment SDN domain to provide headers including an underlay MAC header, an underlay IP header, an ESP header placeholder, a UDP header, a network virtualization header, an overlay MAC header, and overlay IP header, wherein the NIC is configured to develop the packet with headers from the environment SDN domain; to populate the ESP header, add any ESP pad, and add an ESP next header field, wherein the NIC encrypts the UDP header, network virtualization header, overlay MAC header, overlay IP header, payload, padding and ESP next header using the proper encryption key for transmission to the remote program, wherein the NIC transmits the encrypted packet over the network interface to the remote program, wherein the NIC receives an encrypted packet from the remote program through the network interface and decrypts the packet using an encryption key referenced by at least one field contained in the received packet, and wherein the decrypted packet is provided to the local program in view of other limitations of the intervening claims. Thus the prior arts of record taking singly or in combination do not teach or suggest the above-stated limitations taking wholly in combination with all the elements of each independent claim. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW J STEINLE whose telephone number is (571)272-9923. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10am-6pm CT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eleni Shiferaw can be reached at (571) 272-3867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW J STEINLE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2497
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 13, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 29, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750224
TOKEN-BASED REMOTE LOGIN USING ATTRIBUTE-BASED ENCRYPTION
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12732385
AUTHENTICATION SYSTEM, AUTHENTICATION MODULE, AND AUTHENTICATION PROGRAM
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726335
TECHNIQUES FOR NON-VOLATILE DATA PROTECTION
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719669
5G KEY GENERATION / ECC KEY GENERATION AND SUCI CALCULATION
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12711273
PSEUDONYMISATION METHOD AND COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING THE METHOD
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.4%)
2y 2m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 565 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month