Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/238,100

METHODS, NODE APPARATUS, AND SYSTEMS CREATING A NETWORK FOR ENHANCED MONITORING OF ITEMS IN TRANSIT

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jun 13, 2025
Examiner
FAYED, RASHA K
Art Unit
2413
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Federal Express Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
220 granted / 355 resolved
+4.0% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
394
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
68.4%
+28.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 355 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment 2. Claims 1, 8, 15 and 22 are amended. Claims 1-30 are pending. Information Disclosure Statement 3. The information disclosure statements (IDSs) submitted on 8/14/2025, 10/29/2025 and 1/22/2026 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Response to Arguments With regards to applicant’s arguments, filed on 1/29/2026, have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant asserts, with respect to claims 1, 8, 15 and 22 that Waris does not teach or suggest: “associating, by the server, only a first node of the plurality of wireless nodes with a first item, wherein the first node is operative to communicate directly with the server to exchange information related to the first item in transit”. Examiner respectfully disagrees. Waris teaches a goods transport system and method 100, wherein a package control device controls handover of a package between individuals without a need for communication with a server during a transport session. The system and method can include, a server 180, a database 185, personal devices 110 shown in FIG. 1B of the users of the system and method (e.g., personal device 117 of a sender, personal device 118 of a transporter, personal device 119 of a recipient, etc.) communicating with the server 180 over communications network 175 (e.g., a wired and/or wireless communications network), and a package control device (PCD) 150 attached to a package 140. [PCD 150 is associated with package 140] The personal devices 110 can be configured to provide access to the system and method by individual users and allow the users to conveniently and securely perform operations with the packages 140. As illustrated in Fig. 2 & 3, the sender's device 117 sends to the PCD 150 the new transport instructions. The PCD 150 attached to the package 140 authenticates and authorizes the transporter to pick up the package 140 by communicating security information with the transporter's device 118, and stores pick-up event data for uploading to the server 180. After the sender 111 has attached the PCD 150 to the package 140, the sender's personal device 117 communicates transport instructions to the PCD 150, which then locks itself. The PCD 150 then communicates its previously stored package operations and status data to the sender's personal device 117, which communicates the operations and status data to the TMS 170. The PCD 150 attached to the package 140 authenticates and authorizes the transporter to pick up the package 140 by communicating security information with the transporter's device 118, and stores pick-up event data for uploading to the server 180. The PCD 150 attached to the package 140 authenticates and authorizes the recipient to pick up the package 140 by communicating security information with the recipient's device 118, and stores pick-up event data for uploading to the server 180. The locking of the attachment of the PCD 150 to the package 140 can include a feature that mechanically hinders the opening of the package 150. [Therefore, the control device 150 is associated with only package 140 for monitoring the status and operations of a package and package 140 is associated to the sender's personal device 117 ] (See Waris; Par. [34]-[38, [48]-[50]. [59] and Fig. 1A & 1B) Therefore, and for the reasons set above, Waris teaches the claimed invention. The rejection of claims 1-30 is sustained. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 5. Claims 1-16, 19, 22-23, 26 and 29-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Waris et al. (US. Pub. No. 2014/0279596 A1). Regarding claim 1, Waris discloses a method for creating a network for enhanced monitoring of items in transit, the network comprising a plurality of wireless nodes and a server (See Abstract and Fig. 1A of Waris for a reference to a system for managing transportation and storage of goods including a server and personal computer device. Device associated with a package and a package control), the method comprising: associating, by the server, only a first node of the plurality of wireless nodes with a first item (See Par. [34]-[38], [48]-[50], [59] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to a sender's personal device 117 [First Node] associated with a package 140 communicates with server 180), wherein the first node is operative to communicate directly with the server to exchange information related to the first item in transit (See Par. [34]-[38], [48]-[50] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the sender's personal device 117 is in direct communication with the server 180 over communication network 175); associating, by the server, a second node of the plurality of wireless nodes with a second item (See Par. [34]-[38], [108]-[112] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the package control device 150 [Second Node] associated with package for monitoring the status and operations of a package), wherein the second node is operative to communicate directly with a third node of the plurality of wireless nodes to exchange information about the second item in transit (See Par. [37], [42], [46] and Fig 1B of Waris for a reference to the package control device 150 communicates directly with the sender’s personal device 117 to exchange information related to package 140 over communication network 155) but unable to communicate directly with the server due to a lack of communication interface capable of communicating directly with the server (See Par. [34]-[38], [42] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the package control device 150 does not include a comm interface to comm with the server; therefore unable to communicate directly with the server), the third node of the plurality being operative to communicate directly with the server to exchange information about the second package in transit (See Par. [34]-[38], [48]-[49] and Fig 1A of Waris for a reference to the sender’s personal device 117 [Third Node] is in direct communication with the server 180,over communication network 175,to exchange information related to a package); and associating, by the server, the second node with the third node (See Par. [34]-[38], [48]-[49] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the package control device 150 is associated by the server 180 with all personal devices, including the transporter’s personal device 118). Regarding claim 2, Waris discloses wherein the first node comprises a long range communication interface (See Par. [46], [140] and Fig 1A-1B & 6 of Waris for a reference to the personal devices including the sender's personal device 117 is in communication with the server /TMS over communication network, which may be cellular comm-network, 3G or 4G communication networks, [Long -range path interface]) and the second node comprises a short range communication interface (See Par. [44], [46], [83], [92] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the personal devices including the sender’s personal device 117 is in communication with the server /TMS over communication network, which may include Bluetooth or ZigBee Networks, proximity connections, such as NFC or RFID.[Short- range path interface]). Regarding claim 3, Waris discloses wherein the first node further comprises a short range communication interface (See Par. [44], [46], [83], [92] and Fig 1A-1B & 6 of Waris for a reference to transporter’s personal device 118 is in communication with the server /TMS over communication network, which may include Bluetooth or ZigBee Networks, proximity connections, such as NFC or RFID.[Short- range path interface]). Regarding claim 4, Waris discloses wherein the first node further comprises a medium range communication interface (See Par. [46], [165] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to sender's personal device 117 is in communication with the server/TMS over communication network, which may include the internet, intranet, Local Area Network (LAN) card interface [medium range path interface]). Regarding claim 5, Waris discloses wherein the second node comprises a short range communication interface (See Par. [44], [46], [83], [92] and Fig 1A-1B & 6 of Waris for a reference to the package device 118 is in communication with the server /TMS over communication network, which may include Bluetooth or ZigBee Networks, proximity connections, such as NFC or RFID.[Short- range path interface]), and the third node comprises a long range interface (See Par. [46], [140] and Fig 1A-1B & 6 of Waris for a reference to the personal devices including the transporter’s personal device 118 is in communication with the server /TMS over communication network, which may be cellular comm-network, 3G or 4G communication networks, [Long -range path interface]). Regarding claim 6, Waris discloses wherein the third node further comprises a short range communication interface (See Par. [44], [46], [83], [92] and Fig 1A-1B & 6 of Waris for a reference to the transporter’s personal device 118 is in communication with the server /TMS over communication network, which may include Bluetooth or ZigBee Networks, proximity connections, such as NFC or RFID.[Short- range path interface]). Regarding claim 7, Waris discloses wherein the third node further comprises a medium range communication interface (See Par. [46], [165] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the transporter’s personal device 118 is in communication with the server/TMS over communication network, which may include the internet, intranet, Local Area Network (LAN) card interface [medium range path interface]). Regarding claim 8, Waris discloses a system for creating a network for enhanced monitoring of items in transit (See Abstract and Fig. 1A of Waris for a reference to a system for managing transportation and storage of goods including a server and personal computer device. Device associated with a package and a package control), comprising: a server (See Fig. 1A; Server 180); a plurality of wireless nodes comprising a first node, a second node, and a third node (See Par. of Waris for a reference to a system for managing transportation and storage of goods including a server and personal computer device. Device associated with a package and a package control), comprising: a server (See Fig. 1A; Server 180), wherein the first node is operative to communicate directly with the server (See Par. [34]-[38], [48]-[49] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the transporter’s personal device 118 is in direct communication with the server 180 over communication network 175), wherein the second node is operative to communicate directly with the third node of the plurality of wireless nodes (See Par. [37], [42], [46] and Fig 1B of Waris for a reference to the package control device 150 communicates directly with the sender’s personal device 117 to exchange information related to package 140 over communication network 155) but unable to communicate directly with the server due to a lack of communication interface capable of communicating directly with the server (See Par. [34]-[38], [42] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the package control device 150 does not include a comm interface to comm with the server; therefore unable to communicate directly with the server), and wherein the third node of the plurality is operative to communicate directly with the server (See Par. [34]-[38], [48]-[49] and Fig 1A of Waris for a reference to the sender’s personal device 117 [Third Node] is in direct communication with the server 180,over communication network 175,to exchange information related to a package); wherein the server is operative to: associate only the first node of the plurality of wireless nodes with a first item, wherein the first node communicates directly with the server to exchange information about the first item in transit (See Par. [34]-[38], [48]-[50], [59] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to a sender's personal device 117 [First Node] associated with a package 140 communicates with server 180); associate the second node of the plurality of wireless nodes with a second item (See Par. [34]-[38], [108]-[112] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the package control device 150 [Second Node] associated with package for monitoring the status and operations of a package); and associate the second node with the third node, wherein the second node communicates with the third node to exchange information about the second item in transit (See Par. [34]-[38], [48]-[49] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the package control device 150 is associated by the server 180 with all personal devices, including the transporter’s personal device 118) and the third node communicates with the server to exchange the information about the second item in transit (See Par. [34]-[38], [48]-[49] and Fig 1A of Waris for a reference to the transporter’s personal device 118 [Third Node] is in direct communication with the server 180,over communication network 175,to exchange information related to a package). Regarding claim 9, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 2. Regarding claim 10, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 3. Regarding claim 11, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 4. Regarding claim 12, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 5. Regarding claim 13, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 6. Regarding claim 14, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 7. Regarding claim 15, Waris discloses a method for creating a network for enhanced monitoring of items in transit , the network comprising a plurality of wireless nodes and a server (See Abstract and Fig. 1A of Waris for a reference to a system for managing transportation and storage of goods including a server and personal computer device. Device associated with a package and a package control), comprising: associating, by the server, only a first node of the plurality of wireless nodes with a first item (See Par. [34]-[38], [48]-[50], [59] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to a sender's personal device 117 [First Node] associated with a package 140 communicates with server 180), wherein the first node includes a medium range (See Par. [46], [165] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to sender's personal device 117 is in communication with the server/TMS over communication network, which may include the internet, intranet, Local Area Network (LAN) card interface [medium range path interface]) and a long range communication interface (See Par. [46], [140] and Fig 1A-1B & 6 of Waris for a reference to the personal devices including the transporter’s personal device 118 is in communication with the server /TMS over communication network, which may be cellular comm-network, 3G or 4G communication networks, [Long -range path interface]) and wherein the first node is operative to communicate directly with the server to exchange information related to the first item in transit using at least the long range communication interface of the first node (See Par. [34]-[38], [48]-[49] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the transporter’s personal device 118 is in direct communication with the server 180 over communication network 175, which may be cellular comm-network, 3G or 4G communication networks, [Long -range path interface]); and associating, by the server, a second node of the plurality of wireless nodes with a second item (See Par. [34]-[38], [108]-[112] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the sender’s personal device 117 [Second Node] associated with package for monitoring the status and operations of a package), wherein the second node includes at least a long range interface and wherein the second node is operative to communicate directly with the server to exchange information related to the second item in transit using at least the long range communication interface of the second node (See Par. [37], [42], [46] and Fig 1B of Waris for a reference to the package control device 150 communicates directly with the sender’s personal device 117 to exchange information related to package 140 over communication network 175, which may be cellular comm-network, 3G or 4G communication networks, [Long -range path interface]). Regarding claim 16, Waris discloses the method of claim 15, further comprising associating, by the server, a third node of the wireless plurality of wireless nodes with a third item(See Par. [34]-[38], [48]-[49] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to a personal device of a recipient 119 [Third Node] associated with a package communicates with server 180), wherein the third node includes a short range (See Par. [44], [46], [83], [92] and Fig 1A-1B & 6 of Waris for a reference to recipient’s personal device 119 is in communication with the server /TMS over communication network, which may include Bluetooth or ZigBee Networks, proximity connections, such as NFC or RFID.[Short- range path interface]) and a long range communication interface (See Par. [46], [140] and Fig 1A-1B & 6 of Waris for a reference to the personal devices including the recipient’s personal device 119 is in communication with the server /TMS over communication network, which may be cellular comm-network, 3G or 4G communication networks, [Long -range path interface]) and wherein the third node is operative to communicate directly with the server to exchange information related to the third item in transit using at least the long range communication interface of the third node (See Par. [34]-[38], [48]-[49] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the recipient’s personal device 119 is in direct communication with the server 180 over communication network 175). Regarding claim 19, Waris discloses wherein the second node further comprises a medium range communication interface (See Par. [46], [165] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to sender’s personal device 117 is in communication with the server/TMS over communication network, which may include the internet, intranet, Local Area Network (LAN) card interface [medium range path interface]). Regarding claim 22, Waris discloses a system for creating a network for enhanced monitoring of items in transit (See Abstract and Fig. 1A of Waris for a reference to a system for managing transportation and storage of goods including a server and personal computer device. Device associated with a package and a package control), comprising: a server (See Fig. 1A; Server 180); a plurality of wireless nodes comprising a first node and a second node (See Par. of Waris for a reference to a system for managing transportation and storage of goods including a server and personal computer devices, including transporter’s personal device 118 [First] and sender’s personal device 117 [Second] associated with a package), wherein the first node comprises a medium range (See Par. [46], [165] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to transporter’s personal device 118 is in communication with the server/TMS over communication network, which may include the internet, intranet, Local Area Network (LAN) card interface [medium range path interface]) and a long range communication interface (See Par. [46], [140] and Fig 1A-1B & 6 of Waris for a reference to the personal devices including the transporter’s personal device 118 is in communication with the server /TMS over communication network, which may be cellular comm-network, 3G or 4G communication networks, [Long -range path interface]), wherein the first node is operative to communicate directly with the server using at least the long range communication interface of the first node (See Par. [34]-[38], [48]-[49] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the transporter’s personal device 118 is in direct communication with the server 180 over communication network 175, which may be cellular comm-network, 3G or 4G communication networks, [Long -range path interface]), wherein the second node comprises at least a long range communication interface (See Par. [46], [140] and Fig 1A-1B & 6 of Waris for a reference to the personal devices including the sender’s personal device 117 is in communication with the server /TMS over communication network, which may be cellular comm-network, 3G or 4G communication networks, [Long -range path interface]), and wherein the second node is operative to communicate directly with the server using at least the long range communication interface of the second node (See Par. [37], [42], [46] and Fig 1B of Waris for a reference to the sender’s personal device 117 communicates directly with the server to exchange information related to package 140 over communication network 175, which may be cellular comm-network, 3G or 4G communication networks, [Long -range path interface]); wherein the server is operative to: associate only the first node of the plurality of wireless nodes with a first item ((See Par. [34]-[38], [48]-[50], [59] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to a sender's personal device 117 [First Node] associated with a package 140 communicates with server 180); associate the second node of the plurality of wireless nodes with a second item (See Par. [34]-[38], [108]-[112] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the sender’s personal device 117 [Second Node] associated with package for monitoring the status and operations of a package); communicate with the first node to exchange information related to the first item in transit; and communicate with the second node to exchange information related to the second item in transit (See Par. [34]-[38], [48]-[49] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the server exchange package-related information with both the transporter’s personal device 118 {First node] and the sender’s personal device 117 [Second node] over communication network 175). Regarding claim 23, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 16. Regarding claim 26, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 19. Regarding claim 29, Waris discloses wherein the first node comprises a first node sensor and the information related to the first item in transit comprises first node sensor data from the first node sensor (See Par. [44]-[45], [74] and Fig 3A of Waris for a reference to the plurality of personal devices, including the transporter’s personal device 118 [first node] can be implemented as a sensor device. The transporter’s personal device sends sensory signals of goods transport capacity to the server). Regarding claim 30, Waris discloses wherein the second node comprises a second node sensor and the information related to the second item in transit comprises second node sensor data from the second node sensor (See Par. [42], [52], [82] and Fig 3A of Waris for a reference to the package control device [second node] can be implemented as a sensor device, deleting an attempt to move a package while in storage. Sensory signal is exchanged with the personal device 110). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 6. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 7. Claims 17-18, 20-21, 24-25 and 27-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Waris et al. in view of Davis et al. (US. Pub. No. 2013/0023339 A1). Regarding claim 17, Waris discloses wherein the short range communication interface of the third node comprises a Bluetooth ® interface (See Par. [44], [46], [83], [92] and Fig 1A-1B & 6 of Waris for a reference to recipient’s personal device 119 is in communication with the server /TMS over communication network, which may include Bluetooth or ZigBee Networks, proximity connections, such as NFC or RFID.[Short- range path interface]), and the long range communication interface of the first and second nodes comprises a cellular interface (See Par. [46], [140] and Fig 1A-1B & 6 of Waris for a reference to the personal devices including the recipient’s personal device 119 is in communication with the server /TMS over communication network, which may be cellular comm-network, 3G or 4G communication networks, [Long -range path interface]). Waris does not explicitly disclose the medium range communication interface of the first node comprises a Wi-Fi interface. However, Davis discloses the medium range communication interface of the first node comprises a Wi-Fi interface (See Par. [25]-[27], [80] and Fig 1 of Davis for a reference to the mobile computing device may communicate directly with the server using medium range interface, which is a wifi interface). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Davis to Waris. The motivation for combination would be to improve network’s performance, by facilitating the secure transmission of authentication information between the mobile computing device and the server. (Davis; Par. [26]) Regarding claim 18, Waris discloses the long range communication interface of the first node comprises a cellular interface (See Par. [46], [140] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the personal devices including the recipient’s personal device 119 is in communication with the server /TMS over communication network, which may be cellular comm-network, 3G or 4G communication networks, [Long -range path interface]). Waris does not explicitly disclose wherein the medium range communication interface of the first node comprises a Wi-Fi interface However, Davis discloses wherein the medium range communication interface of the first node comprises a Wi-Fi interface (See Par. [25]-[27], [80] and Fig 1 of Davis for a reference to the gaming machine may communicate directly with the server using medium range interface, which is a wifi interface). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Davis to Waris. The motivation for combination would be to improve network’s performance, by facilitating the secure transmission of authentication information between the gaming machine and the server. (Davis; Par. [64]) Regarding claim 20, Waris discloses the long range communication interface of the second node comprises a cellular interface (See Par. [46], [140] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the personal devices including the sender’s personal device 117 [Second Node]is in communication with the server /TMS over communication network, which may be cellular comm-network, 3G or 4G communication networks, [Long -range path interface]). Waris does not explicitly disclose wherein the medium range communication interface of the second node comprises a Wi-Fi interface However, Davis discloses wherein the medium range communication interface of the second node comprises a Wi-Fi interface (See Par. [25]-[27], [80] and Fig 1 of Davis for a reference to the mobile computing device may communicate directly with the server using medium range interface, which is a wifi interface). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Davis to Waris. The motivation for combination would be to improve network’s performance, by facilitating the secure transmission of authentication information between the mobile computing device and the server. (Davis; Par. [26]) Regarding claim 21, Waris discloses the long range communication interface of the first node comprises a cellular interface (See Par. [46], [140] and Fig 1A-1B of Waris for a reference to the personal devices including the recipient’s personal device 119 is in communication with the server /TMS over communication network, which may be cellular comm-network, 3G or 4G communication networks, [Long -range path interface]). Waris does not explicitly disclose wherein the medium range communication interface of the first node comprises a Wi-Fi interface However, Davis discloses wherein the medium range communication interface of the first node comprises a Wi-Fi interface (See Par. [25]-[27], [80] and Fig 1 of Davis for a reference to the gaming machine may communicate directly with the server using medium range interface, which is a wifi interface). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Davis to Waris. The motivation for combination would be to improve network’s performance, by facilitating the secure transmission of authentication information between the gaming machine and the server. (Davis; Par. [64]) Regarding claim 24, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 17. Regarding claim 25, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 18. Regarding claim 27, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 20. Regarding claim 28, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 21. Conclusion 8. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Deluca (US. Pub. No. 2017/0054521 A1) discloses system and method for automated activation of a radio, or content receiver, used to receive subscription radio services such as XM or Sirius radio. Wu et al. (US. Pub. No. 2016/0234302 A1) discloses a method and related device and system for distributing virtual items. Albert, JR et al. (US. Pub. No. 2014/0136318 A1) discloses methods for targeting advertisements to a group of proximate electronic devices. 9. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. 10. Any inquiry concerning this communication from the examiner should be directed to RASHA FAYED whose telephone number is (571) 270-3804. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 8:00AM-4:30PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the supervisory Examiner, Un Cho can be reached on (571)272-7919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /R.K.F/Examiner, Art Unit 2413 /UN C CHO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2413
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 13, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jan 29, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593353
METHOD FOR INFORMATION TRANSMISSION, TERMINAL DEVICE, AND NETWORK-SIDE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592755
COORDINATED BEAMFORMING (COBF) PROTOCOL FOR UNMANAGED NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587867
INTERFERENCE MANAGEMENT FOR DYNAMIC SPECTRUM SHARING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581367
MEDICAL SYSTEM WITH SELF-HEALING WIRELESS NETWORK OF SENSORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574174
REFERENCE SIGNAL CONFIGURATION TO ACCOUNT FOR A COMPRESSION FACTOR ASSOCIATED WITH TRANSMIT (TX) NONLINEARITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+28.0%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 355 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month