Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/240,749

INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 17, 2025
Priority
Feb 17, 2023 — continuation of PCTJP2023005643
Examiner
GOODCHILD, WILLIAM J
Art Unit
2431
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
625 granted / 752 resolved
+25.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
766
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
§103
54.7%
+14.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 752 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 7, 9-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) / (a)(2) as being anticipated by Sysman et al., (US Publication No. 2017/0134423), hereinafter “Sysman”. Regarding claims 1, 10-11, Sysman discloses processing circuitry to estimate a decoy theme which is a theme of information that a high risk user being a user of a target system is attempting to leak externally, based on an access log indicating access in the target system by the high risk user [Sysman, paragraphs 21, 191-194, 216-220, figures 2A-2F, 7, Monitoring logs; The campaign manager may create the fake identity to be consistent with information of the certain user as used during one or more of the past attempts and/or attacks; The campaign manager creates and/or updates one or more of the decoy endpoints and/or the decoy network to comply with the fake identity created for the certain user in order to verify consistency of the deception environment as viewed by the potential attacker; Assuming the certain user is a programmer, the campaign manager may create the decoy endpoint to include typical programming environment consistent with the programming area of the certain user], and to place a decoy file matching the estimated decoy theme in the target system [Sysman, paragraphs 191-194, 216-220, figures 2A-2F, 7, The campaign manager may create the fake identity to be consistent with information of the certain user as used during one or more of the past attempts and/or attacks. The campaign manager creates and/or updates one or more of the decoy endpoints and/or the decoy network to comply with the fake identity created for the certain user in order to verify consistency of the deception environment as viewed by the potential attacker. Assuming the certain user is a programmer, the campaign manager may create the decoy endpoint to include typical programming environment consistent with the programming area of the certain user]. Regarding claim 2, Sysman further discloses wherein the processing circuitry calculates a risk value corresponding to each user based on an access pattern in the target system of each user of the target system, and wherein the high risk user is, among users of the target system, a user whose corresponding risk value is equal to or greater than a risk criterion value [Sysman, paragraphs 21, 191-194, 199, 216-220, figures 2A-2F, 7, review potential attackers available profile]. Regarding claim 3, Sysman further discloses wherein the processing circuitry increases a risk value corresponding to the target user if the target user, who is a user of the target system, accesses the decoy file [Sysman, paragraphs 21, 191-194, 199, 216-220, figures 2A-2F, 7, review potential attackers available profile]. Regarding claim 4, Sysman further discloses wherein the processing circuitry selects a file from a database storing files that are candidates for the decoy file based on the estimated decoy theme [Sysman, paragraph 120]. Regarding claim 7, Sysman further discloses wherein the processing circuitry generates a file based on the estimated decoy theme as the decoy file, and uses the generated file as the decoy file [Sysman, paragraphs 21, 191-194, 199, 216-220, figures 2A-2F, 7]. Regarding claim 9, Sysman further discloses wherein the processing circuitry estimates the decoy theme based on a viewing time by the high risk user of each file stored in the target system [Sysman, paragraphs 21, 191-194, 199, 216-220, figures 2A-2F, 7]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-6, 8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIAM J GOODCHILD whose telephone number is (571)270-1589. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeff Pwu can be reached at 571-272-6798. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /William J. Goodchild/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2433
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 17, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700996
QUANTUM KEY TRANSMISSION METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701000
METHOD FOR SECURING TELECOMMUNICATION TRANSCEIVER INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DESIGNS AGAINST PIRACY, COUNTERFEITING AND UNAUTHORIZED USE
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695626
DIGITAL SIGNATURES WITH RE-RANDOMIZED PRESIGNATURES
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12670050
Device Administration with Public Key Infrastructure
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12664477
COMPUTING ITEM FINDABILITY THROUGH A FINDABILITY MACHINE-LEARNING MODEL
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+14.0%)
3y 3m (~2y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 752 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month