Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 19/240,992

Successive approximation register analog-to-digital converter and digital-to-analog conversion circuit thereof

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 17, 2025
Priority
Jul 16, 2024 — TW 113126612
Examiner
JEANGLAUDE, JEAN BRUNER
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Realtek Semiconductor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allowance Rate
1111 granted / 1186 resolved
+25.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 7m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1207
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
§103
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§102
35.8%
-4.2% vs TC avg
§112
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1186 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Detailed Office Action Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 – 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated Janakiraman et al. (US Patent Number 8,766,839). Regarding claim 1, Jankirman et al. disclose a successive approximation register analog-to-digital converter (SAR ADC) (figs. 1, 2) comprising: a digital-to-analog conversion circuit (150, fig. 1) configured to receive an analog input signal during a sampling period and receive a first set of reference signals according to a first set of switch control signals during a holding period so as to accomplish charge redistribution and thereby output a sampling-and-switching operation result, the digital-to-analog conversion circuit including: a first set of switches configured to determine a coupling state of each capacitor of a first capacitor group according to the first set of switch control signals, wherein the first set of reference signals received by the digital-to-analog conversion circuit varies with a change in the first set of switch control signals (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59) and the first capacitor group configured to sample the analog input signal during the sampling period and receive the first set of reference signals through the first set of switches during the holding period so as to accomplish the charge redistribution, the first capacitor group including: a first subsidiary capacitor group, wherein each capacitor of the first subsidiary capacitor group is composed of one or more first unit capacitor(s) (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59) and a second subsidiary capacitor group, wherein each capacitor of the second subsidiary capacitor group is composed of one or more second unit capacitor(s), a layout of the second unit capacitor is different from a layout of the first unit capacitor, and a designed capacitance value of the second unit capacitor is greater than a designed capacitance value of the first unit capacitor (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59); a comparison circuit configured to generate a comparison result (170, fig. 1) according to the sampling- and-switching operation result; and a control circuit (190, fig. 1) configured to generate the first set of switch control signals and a digital output signal according to the comparison result. Regarding claim 13, Jankirman et al. disclose a digital-to-analog conversion circuit (fig. 1, 2) comprising a first set of switches and a first capacitor group (fig. 2) , wherein: the first capacitor group is configured to receive an analog input signal during a sampling period and then receive a first set of reference signals through the first set of switches during a holding period so as to accomplish charge redistribution and thereby output a sampling-and-switching operation result, the first capacitor group including: a first subsidiary capacitor group, wherein each capacitor of the first subsidiary capacitor group is composed of one or more first unit capacitor(s) (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59); and a second subsidiary capacitor group, wherein each capacitor of the second subsidiary capacitor group is composed of one or more second unit capacitor(s), a layout of the second unit capacitor is different from a layout of the first unit capacitor, and a designed capacitance value of the second unit capacitor is greater than a designed capacitance value of the first unit capacitor (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59); Regarding claim 2, Jankirman et al. disclose a successive approximation register analog-to-digital converter (SAR ADC) (figs. 1, 2) wherein the first unit capacitor has a minimum capacitance value among all capacitors of the first subsidiary capacitor group and the second unit capacitor has a minimum capacitance value among all capacitors of the second subsidiary capacitor group (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59). Regarding claim 3, Jankirman et al. disclose a successive approximation register analog-to-digital converter (SAR ADC) (figs. 1, 2), wherein the designed capacitance value of the second unit capacitor is greater than twice the designed capacitance value of the first unit capacitor (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59). Regarding claim 4, Jankirman et al. disclose a successive approximation register analog-to-digital converter (SAR ADC) (figs. 1, 2)wherein: the first subsidiary capacitor group includes a first capacitor and a second capacitor, the first capacitor is composed of P first unit capacitor(s), the second capacitor is composed of Q first unit capacitor(s), the P and the Q are positive integers, and the P is different from the Q; and the second subsidiary capacitor group includes a third capacitor and a fourth capacitor, the third capacitor is composed of X second unit capacitor(s), the fourth capacitor is composed of Y second unit capacitor(s), the X and the Y are positive integers, and the X is different from the Y (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59). Regarding claim 5, Jankirman et al. disclose a successive approximation register analog-to-digital converter (SAR ADC) (figs. 1, 2), wherein the designed capacitance value of the second unit capacitor is greater than a designed capacitance value of any capacitor of the first subsidiary capacitor group (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59). Regarding claim 6, Jankirman et al. disclose a successive approximation register analog-to-digital converter (SAR ADC) (figs. 1, 2), wherein an adjusted capacitance value of the first unit capacitor is equal to a product of a measured capacitance value of the first unit capacitor and a first coefficient, a ratio of the adjusted capacitance value of the first unit capacitor to a measured capacitance value of the second unit capacitor meets a predetermined ratio, and the control circuit determines the digital output signal according to the first coefficient (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59). Regarding claim 7, Jankirman et al. disclose a successive approximation register analog-to-digital converter (SAR ADC) (figs. 1, 2), wherein when a single change in the first set of switch control signals changes a coupling state of M first unit capacitor(s) of the first subsidiary capacitor group during the holding period, the control circuit adjusts a digital code corresponding to the M according to the first coefficient and thereby generates a part of the digital output signal, in which the M is a positive integer not greater than a number of all first unit capacitor(s) of the first subsidiary capacitor group (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59). Regarding claim 8, Jankirman et al. disclose a successive approximation register analog-to-digital converter (SAR ADC) (figs. 1, 2), wherein the control circuit (190, fig. 1) includes: a control-logic circuit configured to generate the first set of switch control signals according to the comparison result and generate the digital code corresponding to the M;a digital code weight assignment circuit configured to assign the first coefficient appropriate for the digital code; and a digital code adjustment circuit configured to adjust the digital code according to the first coefficient (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59). Regarding claim 9, Jankirman et al. disclose a successive approximation register analog-to-digital converter (SAR ADC) (figs. 1, 2), wherein an adjusted capacitance value of the second unit capacitor is equal to a product of a measured capacitance value of the second unit capacitor and a second coefficient, a ratio of the adjusted capacitance value of the second unit capacitor to a measured capacitance value of the first unit capacitor meets a predetermined ratio, and the control circuit determines the digital output signal according to the second coefficient (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59). Regarding claim 10, Jankirman et al. disclose a successive approximation register analog-to-digital converter (SAR ADC) (figs. 1, 2),, wherein when a single change in the first set of switch control signals changes a coupling state of N second unit capacitor(s) of the second subsidiary capacitor group during the holding period, the control circuit adjusts a digital code corresponding to the N according to the second coefficient and thereby generates a part of the digital output signal, in which the N is a positive integer not greater than a number of all second unit capacitor(s) of the second subsidiary capacitor group (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59). Regarding claim 11, Jankirman et al. disclose a successive approximation register analog-to-digital converter (SAR ADC) (figs. 1, 2), wherein the control circuit (190, fig. 1) includes: a control-logic circuit configured to generate the first set of switch control signals according to the comparison result and generate the digital code corresponding to the N; a digital code weight assignment circuit configured to assign the second coefficient appropriate for the digital code; and a digital code adjustment circuit configured to adjust the digital code according to the second coefficient (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59). Regarding claim 12, Jankirman et al. disclose a successive approximation register analog-to-digital converter (SAR ADC) (figs. 1, 2), wherein the analog input signal is a differential signal composed of a noninverting signal and an inverting signal, the first capacitor group is configured to sample the noninverting signal during the sampling period, the analog-to-digital conversion circuit further includes a second capacitor group configured to sample the inverting signal during the sampling period (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59)., and the second capacitor group includes:a third subsidiary capacitor group, wherein each capacitor of the third subsidiary capacitor group includes one or more third unit capacitor(s), (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59) and the third unit capacitor is equivalent to the first unit capacitor; and a fourth subsidiary capacitor group, wherein each capacitor of the fourth subsidiary capacitor group includes one or more fourth unit capacitor(s), and the fourth unit capacitor is equivalent to the second unit capacitor (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59). Regarding claim 14, Jankirman et al. disclose a digital-to-analog conversion circuit (fig. 1, 2), wherein the first unit capacitor has a minimum capacitance value among all capacitors of the first subsidiary capacitor group and the second unit capacitor has a minimum capacitance value among all capacitors of the second subsidiary capacitor group (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59). Regarding claim 15, Jankirman et al. disclose a digital-to-analog conversion circuit (fig. 1, 2), wherein the designed capacitance value of the second unit capacitor is greater than twice the designed capacitance value of the first unit capacitor (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59). Regarding claim 16, Jankirman et al. disclose a digital-to-analog conversion circuit (fig. 1, 2) wherein: the first subsidiary capacitor group includes a first capacitor and a second capacitor, the first capacitor is composed of P first unit capacitor(s), the second capacitor is composed of Q first unit capacitor(s), the P and the Q are positive integers, and the P is different from the Q; and the second subsidiary capacitor group includes a third capacitor and a fourth capacitor, the third capacitor is composed of X second unit capacitor(s), the fourth capacitor is composed of Y second unit capacitor(s), the X and the Y are positive integers, and the X is different from the Y (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59). Regarding claim 17, Jankirman et al. disclose a digital-to-analog conversion circuit (fig. 1, 2), wherein the designed capacitance value of the second unit capacitor is greater than a designed capacitance value of any capacitor of the first subsidiary capacitor group (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59). Regarding claim 18, Jankirman et al. disclose a digital-to-analog conversion circuit (fig. 1, 2) wherein an adjusted capacitance value of the first unit capacitor is equal to a product of a measured capacitance value of the first unit capacitor and a first coefficient, a ratio of the adjusted capacitance value of the first unit capacitor to a measured capacitance value of the second unit capacitor meets a predetermined ratio, and the control circuit determines the digital output signal according to the first coefficient (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59). Regarding claim 19, Jankirman et al. disclose a digital-to-analog conversion circuit (fig. 1, 2), wherein an adjusted capacitance value of the second unit capacitor is equal to a product of a measured capacitance value of the second unit capacitor and a second coefficient, a ratio of the adjusted capacitance value of the second unit capacitor to a measured capacitance value of the first unit capacitor meets a predetermined ratio, and the control circuit determines the digital output signal according to the second coefficient (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59). Regarding claim 20, Jankirman et al. disclose a digital-to-analog conversion circuit (fig. 1, 2), wherein the analog input signal is a differential signal composed of a noninverting signal and an inverting signal, the first capacitor group is configured to sample the noninverting signal during the sampling period, the analog-to-digital conversion circuit further includes a second capacitor group configured to sample the inverting signal during the sampling period, and the second capacitor group includes: a third subsidiary capacitor group, wherein each capacitor of the third subsidiary capacitor group includes one or more third unit capacitor(s), and the third unit capacitor is equivalent to the first unit capacitor; and a fourth subsidiary capacitor group, wherein each capacitor of the fourth subsidiary capacitor group includes one or more fourth unit capacitor(s), and the fourth unit capacitor is equivalent to the second unit capacitor (figs. 1, 2; col. 2, line 35 to col. 3, line 59). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEAN BRUNER JEANGLAUDE whose telephone number is (571)272-1804. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7:00 AM-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dameon Levi can be reached at 571-272-2105. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEAN B JEANGLAUDE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 17, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771367
SIGNAL PROCESSOR APPARATUS
4y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771362
VARIABLE RESISTOR AND DIGITAL-TO-ANALOG CONVERTER
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771371
DISCRETE TIME AMPLIFIED CHARGE OR VOLTAGE SAMPLER WITH ADJUSTABLE GAIN
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771370
Signal Sampling Circuitry and A Method for Signal Sampling and Holding
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763169
QUALITY SCORE COMPRESSION
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+5.6%)
1y 7m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1186 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month