Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/241,392

PISTOL SLIDE WITH IMPROVED GAS MANAGEMENT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 18, 2025
Examiner
MORGAN, DERRICK R
Art Unit
3641
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Angled Spade Technologies LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
436 granted / 603 resolved
+20.3% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
627
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§102
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
§112
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 603 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bluehdorn, US Patent No. 1,738,751. Regarding claim 1, Bluehdorn discloses a pistol (title) comprising: a frame (5); a slide (assembly of 6 and 15) operable to reciprocate with respect to the frame (shown in transition from figure 1 to 2) and having an upper surface and a forward end (figure 3 shows a forward end and upper surface is shown in figures 1-3); a barrel (7) received by the slide and having a muzzle spaced rearward from the forward end of the slide (shown in figure 1, for example, the forward end of the barrel is rear of the forward end of 15 of the slide assembly); and the upper surface of the slide being sloped upward forward of the muzzle of the barrel (15 as shown in figure 3 is sloped upward forward of the barrel and page 1 line 87-96 discloses 15 is preferably attached to the slide as in figures 1-2 for example) Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Toner et al., hereafter Toner, US Patent Publication No. 12,007,189. Regarding claim 1, Toner discloses a pistol (200) comprising: a frame (figures 8 and 9 for example); a slide (100) operable to reciprocate with respect to the frame and having an upper surface and a forward end (shown in figure 7, forward end and upper surface 160 which is interpreted to include the upper surface throughout the forward end); a barrel (130) received by the slide and having a muzzle spaced rearward from the forward end of the slide (figure 7); and the upper surface of the slide being sloped upward forward of the muzzle of the barrel (160 is broadly, yet reasonably, an upper surface of the slide and figure 7 clearly shows 160 is sloped upward forward of the muzzle and 5:40-49 also discloses 160 is an inclined top surface). Claim(s) 1 is/are alternatively rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Toner. Regarding claim 1, Toner discloses a pistol (200) comprising: a frame (figures 8 and 9 for example); a slide (100) operable to reciprocate with respect to the frame and having an upper surface and a forward end (figure 1 shows the forward end and annotated figure below shows the interpretation of the upper surface); a barrel (130) received by the slide and having a muzzle spaced rearward from the forward end of the slide (figure 7); and the upper surface of the slide being sloped upward forward of the muzzle of the barrel (annotated below, the upper surface is upwardly sloped forward of the muzzle in several locations) PNG media_image1.png 693 810 media_image1.png Greyscale ANNOTATED FIGURE Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure is provided on form PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DERRICK R MORGAN whose telephone number is (571)272-6352. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Troy Chambers can be reached at 5712726874. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DERRICK R MORGAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 18, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595983
DIVERGING CENTRAL BORE FOR FIREARM SOUND SUPPRESSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12578156
Hybrid Magazine for a Firearm
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12566054
MANEUVERING AEROMECHANICALY STABLE SABOT SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12566040
FIREARM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12560392
ACTION SYSTEM FOR FIREARM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.7%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 603 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month