Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/242,481

FIRING BEAM ROCKER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 18, 2025
Priority
Jun 28, 2017 — continuation of 11/478,242 +1 more
Examiner
HIBBERT, MARY C
Art Unit
3731
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Cilag GmbH International
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
201 granted / 304 resolved
-3.9% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
317
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
80.2%
+40.2% vs TC avg
§102
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
§112
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 304 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 21-39 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Alli et al. USPN 6,109,500 (hereinafter Alli). Regarding claim 21, Alli discloses a surgical device (disposable loading unit 30), comprising: a first jaw; a second jaw (fig.3; anvil jaw 36 and cartridge jaw 34) and a firing beam (drive beam 162 and control rod 64) movable through a firing stroke, wherein the firing beam comprising: a body (162) comprising an angled lockout surface (drive block 168); a first cam (cam roller 180 moves along anvil jaw; col.9 lines 1-10) extending from the body and slidable along the first jaw; a second cam (retention foot 188) extending from the body and slidable along the second jaw (along cartridge jaw channel); and a rocker mounted to the body (mounting lock 171 with drive block 168; col.9 lines 9-25), wherein the rocker is movable relative to the body between a locked position and an unlocked position, wherein, in the unlocked position, the rocker is movable with the firing beam through the firing stroke, and wherein, in the locked position, the rocker is positioned to transmit a blocking load directly to the angled lockout surface to prevent the firing stroke (col.12 lines 10-35 “Upon retraction of the drive beam 162, FIG. 15, lock 171 passes under projections 199 and rides over projection 195 until the distalmost portion of lock 171 is proximal to projection 195. U-shaped spring 193 biases lock 171 into juxtaposed alignment with projection 195, effectively disabling the disposable loading unit. If an attempt is made to reactuate the apparatus, the lock 171 will abut projection 195 and will inhibit distal movement of the drive beam 162”). PNG media_image1.png 570 736 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 22, Alli discloses the surgical device of Claim 21, wherein the rocker is rotatable relative to the body between the locked position and the unlocked position (FIG. 3; lock 171 is pivotal about pin 177 relative to drive block 168; col.9 lines 9-15). Regarding claim 23, Alli discloses the surgical device of Claim 22, wherein the rocker, in the unlocked position, is supported over a lockout region by a sled (140) of an unfired staple cartridge (34) removably installed in the first jaw (col.11 lines 34-52). Regarding claim 24, Alli discloses the surgical device of Claim 23, wherein the lockout region comprises a lockout notch define in the first jaw (lock 171 passes under projections 199 interpreted as a lockout notch until biased into alignment with projection 195; col.12 lines 10-35). Regarding claim 25, Alli discloses the surgical device of Claim 22, wherein the rocker is pivotable relative to the body about a fixed axis (FIG. 3; lock 171 is pivotal about pin 177 fixed axis, relative to drive block 168; col.9 lines 9-15). PNG media_image2.png 556 674 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 26, Alli discloses the surgical device of Claim 22, wherein a pivot hole is defined in the body, and wherein the rocker is pivotably coupled to the firing beam at the pivot hole (FIG. 3,12a-c; lock 171 is pivotal about pin 177 through pivot hole bore 175 relative to drive block 168; col.9 lines 9-15). Regarding claim 27, Alli discloses the surgical device of Claim 26, further comprising a pin positioned through the pivot hole, wherein the pivot hole is sized to provide a clearance around at least a portion of the pin (FIG. 3,12a-c; lock 171 is pivotal about pin 177 through pivot hole bore 175 relative to drive block 168; col.9 lines 9-15). Regarding claim 28, Alli discloses the surgical device of Claim 21, wherein the body further comprises a knife edge (knife blade 174; col.9 lines 1-5). Regarding claim 29, Alli discloses the surgical device of Claim 21, wherein the first cam comprises a longitudinal cam surface (cam roller 180), and wherein angled lockout surface is obliquely oriented relate to the longitudinal cam surface (col.9 lines 5-25). Regarding claim 30, Alli discloses the surgical device of Claim 21, wherein the rocker further comprises a base (horizontal cams 189,191), and wherein the body further comprises a ramp surface positioned to abut the base in the locked position of the rocker (col.9 lines 15-25). Regarding claim 31, Alli discloses a surgical stapler (disposable loading unit 30), comprising: a cartridge jaw (34): an anvil jaw (36); and a beam head movably through a staple firing stroke the cartridge jaw and the anvil jaw (drive beam 162 and control rod 64), the beam head comprising: a cartridge cam (retention foot 188) comprising a longitudinal cam surface slidable along the cartridge jaw (along cartridge jaw channel); an anvil cam movable along the anvil jaw (cam roller 180 moves along anvil jaw; col.9 lines 1-10); a distal face comprising a lockout surface obliquely oriented relative to the longitudinal cam surface (drive block 168); and a rocker movable relative to the distal face between a locked position and an unlocked position (mounting lock 171 with drive block 168; col.9 lines 9-25), wherein, in the unlocked position, the rocker is movable with the beam head (162) through the staple firing stroke, and wherein, in the locked position, the rocker is positioned to transmit a blocking load directly to the lockout surface to prevent the staple firing stroke (col.12 lines 10-35 “Upon retraction of the drive beam 162, FIG. 15, lock 171 passes under projections 199 and rides over projection 195 until the distalmost portion of lock 171 is proximal to projection 195. U-shaped spring 193 biases lock 171 into juxtaposed alignment with projection 195, effectively disabling the disposable loading unit. If an attempt is made to reactuate the apparatus, the lock 171 will abut projection 195 and will inhibit distal movement of the drive beam 162”). Regarding claim 32, Alli discloses the surgical stapler of Claim 31, wherein the rocker is rotatable relative to the distal face between the locked position and the unlocked position (FIG. 3; lock 171 is pivotal about pin 177 relative to drive block 168; col.9 lines 9-15). Regarding claim 33, Alli discloses the surgical stapler of Claim 32, further comprising an unfired staple cartridge comprising a sled (140), wherein the rocker, in the unlocked position, is supported by the sled of the unfired staple cartridge (col.11 lines 34-52). Regarding claim 34, Alli discloses the surgical stapler of Claim 33, wherein the cartridge jaw comprises a lockout notch, and wherein the rocker, in the unlocked position, is supported over the lockout notch by the sled of the unfired staple cartridge (lock 171 passes under projections 199 interpreted as a lockout notch until biased into alignment with projection 195; col.12 lines 10-35). Regarding claim 35, Alli discloses the surgical stapler of Claim 32, wherein the rocker is pivotable relative to the beam head about a fixed axis (FIG. 3; lock 171 is pivotal about pin 177 fixed axis, relative to drive block 168; col.9 lines 9-15). Regarding claim 36, Alli discloses the surgical stapler of Claim 32, wherein a pivot hole is defined in the beam head, and wherein the rocker is pivotably coupled to the beam head at the pivot hole (FIG. 3,12a-c; lock 171 is pivotal about pin 177 through pivot hole bore 175 relative to drive block 168; col.9 lines 9-15). Regarding claim 37, Alli discloses the surgical stapler of Claim 36, further comprising a pin positioned through the pivot hole, wherein the pivot hole is sized to provide a clearance around at least a portion of the pin (FIG. 3,12a-c; lock 171 is pivotal about pin 177 through pivot hole bore 175 relative to drive block 168; col.9 lines 9-15). Regarding claim 38, Alli discloses the surgical stapler of Claim 31, wherein the beam head further comprises a knife edge (knife blade 174; col.9 lines 1-5). Regarding claim 39, Alli discloses the surgical stapler of Claim 31, wherein the rocker further comprises a base (horizontal cams 189,191), and wherein the beam head further comprises a ramp surface positioned to abut the base in the locked position of the rocker (col.9 lines 15-25). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARY C HIBBERT-COPELAND whose telephone number is (571)270-0601. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 9am -5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anna Kinsaul can be reached at 5712701926. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARY C HIBBERT-COPELAND/Examiner, Art Unit 3731 /VERONICA MARTIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 18, 2025
Application Filed
May 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12661115
SURGICAL STAPLING APPARATUS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653533
FASTENER CARTRIDGE DECK WITH A MOVABLE PROJECTION
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12643280
DEEP-DRAWING PACKAGING MACHINE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A PERFORATION
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12582398
Cartridge Status and Presence Detection
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569965
DRIVING AND CONTROLLING MECHANISM AND NAIL GUN HAVING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+27.0%)
3y 10m (~2y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 304 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month