Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/243,176

Panel Suitable as a Floor, Ceiling or Wall Covering, and Covering for a Floor, Ceiling or Wall, Which is Constituted by a Multitude of Such Panels

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jun 19, 2025
Priority
Jul 31, 2020 — NL 2026188 +4 more
Examiner
KATCHEVES, BASIL S
Art Unit
3633
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
I4F Licensing NV
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
900 granted / 1245 resolved
+20.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1274
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
84.7%
+44.7% vs TC avg
§102
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1245 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1, 3, 12, 13, 14 and 22 are objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 1, line 15, “in coupled condition” should recite “in a coupled condition”. Claims 3, 12, 13, 14 and 22 also recite “in coupled”, Appropriate correction is required. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1 and 5 of prior U.S. Patent No.12,359,444. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Regarding claim 1, the limitations of claims 1 and 5 of ‘444 are substantially similar to claim 1 of the instant application. Claims 2-23 are substantially similar to claims 2, 3, 4, 1, and 6-23, respectively, of ‘444. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1 would be allowable if the above double patenting issues are resolved. No prior art of record discloses a panel with two profiles, the first profile and second are configured for coupling by downward insertion and lock in both vertical and horizontal, the first profile has a upward tongue, the second has a downward tongue, an interlocking surface area of the upward tongue is partially inclined upwardly towards the first edge, the interlocking area of the downward tongue is inclined upward away from the second side edge, the interlocking surface areas of a upward tongue and downward tongue each comprise an upper area section and at least one lower area section that are adjacent, which section comprises a crease between the upper and lower adjacent sections, proximal to the crease, the upper area section and the lower area section are inclined differently under an inclination angle which is measured relative to an upward vertical vector of the panel such that the inclination angle of the upper area section is smaller than the inclination angle of the adjacent lower area section, the inclination angle of the upper area section of the interlocking surface area of the upward tongue is in the range of 1 to 5 degrees and the inclination angle of the upper area section of the interlocking surface area of the downward tongue is in the range of 1 to 5 degrees. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Basil Katcheves whose telephone number is (571)272-6846. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday, 8:00 am to 6:30pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Glessner can be reached on (571)272-6754. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BASIL S KATCHEVES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 19, 2025
Application Filed
Nov 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637901
Foldable Wall Systems
4y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631016
STRUCTURAL ASSEMBLY USING DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENT ANCHORS
3y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631017
BRACKET SYSTEM FOR ATTACHING A CANTILEVERED PERGOLA TO A ROOF RAFTER
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631018
BRACKET SYSTEM FOR ATTACHING A CANTILEVERED PERGOLA TO A ROOF RAFTER
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627252
TRESTLE
2y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+17.5%)
2y 4m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1245 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month