Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/243,964

CARRIER-TAPE THERMAL BONDING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 20, 2025
Priority
Jul 12, 2024 — JP 2024-112734
Examiner
BEHA, CAROLINE
Art Unit
1748
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Tokyo Weld Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 12m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
147 granted / 255 resolved
-7.4% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
315
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
64.7%
+24.7% vs TC avg
§102
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
§112
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 255 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The communication dated 6/20/2025 has been entered and fully considered. Claims 1-5 are pending. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kodera Katsuyoshi (JP 2022041083A), hereinafter KODERA, in view of Fujisawa et al. (JP 2014231185A), hereinafter FUJISAWA. Regarding claim 1, KODERA teaches: A carrier-tape thermal bonding device that thermally bonds a top tape to a carrier tape including a cavity inside which a workpiece is accommodated, the carrier tape extending in a transport direction (KODERA teaches a thermal bonding device for a carrier tape [Abstract; 0004; 0016].), the carrier-tape thermal bonding device comprising: a transport rail that is configured to hold the carrier tape and the top tape in a stacked condition and includes a lower end portion (KODERA teaches a transport rail (21) to hold the carrier tape (7) and the top tape (17) in an overlapping state a lower end portion [Fig. 1; 0027].); a heating device that is arranged above the transport rail to be opposed to and parallel to the transport rail and is configured to heat and press the top tape (KODERA teaches a heating device (40) that is arranged above the transport rail (21) opposed to and parallel to the transport rail and configured to heat and press the top tape [Fig. 1; 0027].); and a pneumatic drive unit that has an upper end portion for supporting the lower end portion of the transport rail and is configured to move the transport rail upward and downward (KODERA teaches a pneumatic drive unit (23) that has an upper end portion (24) for supporting the lower end portion (22) of the transport rail (21) [0034-0035; Fig. 1].); wherein: the upper end portion of the drive unit has a concave surface that is curved when seen from the transport direction (KODERA teaches the upper end portion (24) of the drive unit (23) has a concave surface (24a) that is curved [0037].), the lower end portion of the transport rail having a convex surface that is curved when seen from the transport direction (KODERA teaches the lower end portion (22) of the transport rail (21) has a convex surface (22a) [0037].), and a plurality of rollers being interposed between the concave surface and the convex surface (KODERA teaches a plurality of rollers (27) are interposed between the concave surface and the convex surface [0037].); the heating device includes at a lower end portion thereof a pair of heating elements positioned on both sides of a width direction of the cavity (KODERA teaches the heating device (40) includes a lower end portion with a pair of heating elements (41a) positioned on both sides of a width direction of the cavity [0028; 0033; 0038; Fig. 1].); the pair of heating elements are each divided into a preheating area and a pressurizing area formed in this order from an upstream side to a downstream side along the transport direction (KODERA teaches the heating elements (41) of the heating device (40) each pressure and heat carrier tape and top tape [0057; 0065]. KODERAA teaches the bonding device (20) preheating the tapes [0026; 0029].); and a length in the width direction of the preheating area of each heating element is greater than a length in the width direction of the pressurizing area (KODERA teaches the length in the width direction of the preheating area of each heating element (41) is greater than a length in the width direction of the pressurizing area (41a) [Fig. 6; 0028-0030].). If the Applicant remains unconvinced KODERA teaches: the pair of heating elements are each divided into a preheating area and a pressurizing area formed in this order from an upstream side to a downstream side along the transport direction; and a length in the width direction of the preheating area of each heating element is greater than a length in the width direction of the pressurizing area. In the same field of endeavor, molding, FUJISAWA teaches heating elements on a tool that are divided into a heating area (73) [0094] and a pressing area (57) [0158; Figs. 10-12]. FUJISAWA teaches the length in the width direction of the heating area is greater than a length in the width direction of the pressurizing area [Figs. 10-12]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date of the applicant’s invention to modify KODERA, by having the concept of heating elements divided into separate areas and a length in the width direction of the preheating area of each heating element is greater than a length in the width direction of the pressurizing area, as suggested by FUJISAWA, in order to reduce quality defects [0003]. Regarding claim 2, KODERA teaches: wherein a centerline of the preheating area along the transport direction of each heating element corresponds to a centerline of the pressurizing area along the transport direction (KODERA shows a preheating area along the transport direction of each heating element corresponds to a centerline of the pressurizing area along the transport direction [Fig. 6].). Regarding claim 3, KODERA teaches: wherein a length in the transport direction of each of the pair of heating elements present in the preheating area is longer than a length in the transport direction of each of the pair of heating elements present in the pressurizing area (KODERA shows the length in the transport direction of each pair of heating elements (41) present in the preheating area is longer than a length in the in the transportation direction of each of the heating elements present in the pressurizing area (41a) [Fig. 6].). Regarding claim 3, FUJISAWA further teaches: wherein a length in the transport direction of each of the pair of heating elements present in the preheating area is longer than a length in the transport direction of each of the pair of heating elements present in the pressurizing area (FUJISAWA shows the length in the transport direction of each pair of heating elements present in the preheating area is longer than a length in the in the transportation direction of each of the heating elements present in the pressurizing area [Figs. 10-12].). Regarding claim 4, KODERA teaches: wherein the heating device is supported to be rotatable about a rotation shaft extending parallel to the transport direction (KODERA teaches the heating device (40) has an upper rotating shaft (42) provided at the upper end thereof [0031; Figs. 2-3].), so that the heating device is rotatable between an operation position in which the pair of heating elements face downward, and a standby position in which the pair of heating elements face transversely (KODERA teaches the heating device (40) is rotatable between an operation position in which the pair of heating elements (41) and a standby position in which the pair of heating elements face transversely [Fig. 6; 0031-0032].). Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kodera Katsuyoshi (JP 2022041083A), hereinafter KODERA, and Fujisawa et al. (JP 2014231185A), hereinafter FUJISAWA, as applied to claim 4 above, and further in view of Slagel et al. (U.S. 2,999,533), hereinafter SLAGEL. Regarding claim 5, KODERA and FUJISAWA teach all of the claimed limitations as stated above, but are silent as to: wherein a cooling channel that cools the rotation shaft is formed in the rotation shaft. In the same field of endeavor, bonding, SLAGEL, teaches a cooling channel that cools a rotation shaft [Col. 5, lines 69-75]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date of the applicant’s invention to modify KODERA and FUJISAWA, by having a cooling channel that cools to rotation shaft, as suggested by SLAGEL, in order to limit the heat areas of the heating device [Col. 9, lines 3-9]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CAROLINE BEHA whose telephone number is (571)272-2529. The examiner can normally be reached MONDAY - FRIDAY 9:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ABBAS RASHID can be reached at (571) 270-7457. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.B./Examiner, Art Unit 1748 /JACOB T MINSKEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1748
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 20, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 16, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747126
TAPE DISPENSER
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12715181
SCROLLS THAT VACUUM SECURE OBJECTS TO COMPLEX SURFACES
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12703156
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A COMPOSITE COMPONENT FOR A GAS TURBINE ENGINE
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697790
Processing of Composites with Partial Plies
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12687681
OPTICAL CONNECTOR WITH WINDOW AND CORRESPONDING CURING METHODS THEREOF
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+24.0%)
3y 4m (~1y 12m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 255 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month