Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/245,384

CHIP POWER-ON RESET MODULE, CORRESPONDING CHIP AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 22, 2025
Priority
Dec 26, 2022 — CN 202211673093.5 +1 more
Examiner
O TOOLE, COLLEEN J
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
VANCHIP (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
Est. Remaining
69%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
367 granted / 632 resolved
-9.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
7 currently pending
Career history
648
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
60.3%
+20.3% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 632 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 9 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Guimont et al. (U.S. Patent 8,963,590, hereafter Guimont). Claim 1: Guimont teaches a chip power-on reset module (Figure 3), comprising: a power supply state inspection circuit (310, 306, 308, 314), a signal amplification shaping circuit (316), an output driving circuit (322, 332, 334), and a dynamic response enhancement circuit (324, 328, 326, 330), wherein the power supply state inspection circuit (310, 306, 308, 314) is configured to detect a chip power supply (VDD), and when a power voltage state is reversed (at power-on), an analog signal corresponding to a current power supply status is generated (signal at 312); the signal amplification shaping circuit (316, 318) is configured to perform hysteretic amplification (Schmitt trigger) on the analog signal output by the power supply state inspection circuit (input is 312), and then shape the amplified signal to output a digital signal (to 319); the output driving circuit (322, 332, 334) is configured to buffer the digital signal (via 318, 320) to drive outputting (NPOR), and generate a power-on reset signal (NPOR) to drive a load (inherent load connected to NPOR); and the dynamic response enhancement circuit (324, 328, 330, 326) is configured to monitor the power-on reset signal output by the output driving circuit (via 321 and 323), and lock a state of the power-on reset signal when the power-on reset signal is at a high level (column 6 lines 62-65), wherein the dynamic response enhancement circuit comprises a first locking circuit and a second locking circuit, the first locking circuit comprises a PMOS transistor (328) and a first capacitor (324), and the second locking circuit comprises an NMOS transistor (330) and a second capacitor (326). Claim 9: Guimont further teaches an integrated circuit chip, comprising the chip power-on reset module according to claim 1 (column 1 lines 22-40 and column 2 lines 43-67). Claim 10: Guimont further teaches an electronic device, comprising the chip power-on reset module according to claim 1 (column 1 lines 22-40 and column 2 lines 43-67). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 6-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Guimont in view of Wu (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0052465) in view of Hung (U.S. Patent 7,417,476). Claim 6: Guimont teaches the limitations of claim 1 above. Guimont does not specifically teach the details of the Schmitt trigger circuit 316 and inverter 318. Wu teaches a Schmitt trigger circuit (Figure 1, corresponding to the signal amplification shaping circuit 316 of Guimont) comprising a first PMOS transistor (P1), a second PMOS transistor (P2), a third PMOS transistor (P3), a first NMOS transistor (N2), a second NMOS transistor (N1), a third NMOS transistor (N3), a first resistor (110), and a second resistor (120), wherein gate electrodes of the first PMOS transistor (P1), the second PMOS transistor (P2), the first NMOS transistor (N2), and the second NMOS transistor (N1) are connected to a drain electrode of the PMOS transistor (via VDD to 328 of Guimont); drain electrodes of the second PMOS transistor (P2) and the second NMOS transistor (N1) are connected to one end of the second capacitor (output of Figure 1 of Wu is connected to 326 of Guimont via 318, 320 and 322 of Guimont) and gate electrodes of the third PMOS transistor and the third NMOS transistor (at Output), and serve as an output end of the signal amplification shaping circuit (at Output). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the Schmitt trigger circuit of Wu as the Schmitt trigger circuit of Guimont to provide ESD protection and increase circuit reliability ([0005]). Guimont and Wu do not specifically teach the details of the inverter 318 (Figure 3 of Guimont). Hung teaches an inverter connected to the output of a Schmitt trigger circuit (P3, N3 coupled to the output of 315; Figure 3) comprising a fourth PMOS transistor (P3) and a fourth NMOS transistor (N3) where the gate electrodes of the third PMOS transistor (P3 to Output of Wu) and the third NMOS transistor (N3 to Output of Wu) are connected to gate electrodes of the fourth PMOS transistor (P3 of Hung) and the fourth NMOS transistor (N3 of Hung); and drain electrodes of the fourth PMOS transistor (P3 of Hung) and the fourth NMOS transistor (N3 of Hung) are connected to each other (at the output of the inverter) and serve as the output end of the signal amplification shaping circuit. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the inverter taught by Hung in the circuit of Guimont and Wu to provide a well-known inverter topology. Claim 7: The combined circuit further teaches a source electrode of the first PMOS transistor (P1 of Wu) is connected to a power supply terminal (VDD), and a drain electrode of the first PMOS transistor (P1) is connected to source electrodes of the second PMOS transistor (P2) and the third PMOS transistor (P3); a drain electrode of the first NMOS transistor (N2) is connected to source electrodes of the second NMOS transistor (N1) and the third NMOS transistor (N3); a source electrode of the first NMOS transistor (N2) is connected to a ground terminal (VSS); after being connected to the first resistor (110) in series, a drain electrode of the third PMOS transistor (P3) is connected to the ground terminal (VSS); after being connected to the second resistor (120) in series, a drain electrode of the third NMOS transistor (N3) is connected to the power supply terminal (VDD); a source electrode of the fourth PMOS transistor (P3 of Hung) is connected to the power supply terminal (VDD); and a source electrode of the fourth NMOS transistor (N3 of Hung) is connected to the ground terminal (VSS). Claim 8: Guimont teaches the limitations of claim 1 above. Guimont further teaches two-level shaping circuits (322 and 332). Guimont does not specifically teach the details of inverter circuits 322, 332. Hung teaches well-known inverter topology in a power-on reset circuit (P3 and N3 form an inverter). Therefore, the combined circuit teaches the output driving circuit is formed by two-level shaping circuits (322 and 332 of Guimont each comprising P3 and N3 of Hung), wherein a first-level shaping circuit is formed by a fifth PMOS transistor (P3 of Hung in 322 of Guimont) and a fifth NMOS transistor (N3 of Hung in 322 of Guimont), and a second-level shaping circuit is formed by a sixth PMOS transistor (P3 of Hung in 332 of Guimont) and a sixth NMOS transistor (N3 of Hung in 332 of Guimont); gate electrodes of the fifth PMOS transistor and the fifth NMOS transistor (forming the input of inverter 322) are connected to an output end of the signal amplification shaping circuit (connected to 319 via 320 of Guimont); drain electrodes of the fifth PMOS transistor and the fifth NMOS transistor (forming the output of inverter 322) are connected to gate electrodes of the sixth PMOS transistor and the sixth NMOS transistor (forming the input of inverter 332); source electrodes of the fifth PMOS transistor and the sixth PMOS transistor (P3 of Hung in each of 322 and 332 of Guimont) are connected to a power supply terminal (VDD); the source electrodes of the fifth NMOS transistor and the sixth NMOS transistor (N3 of Hung in each of 332 and 332 of Guimont) are connected to a ground terminal (VSS); and drain electrodes of the sixth PMOS transistor and the sixth NMOS transistor (forming the output of inverter 332) are connected to each other, and serve as an output end of the power-on reset signal (NPOR via 334 of Guimont). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the inverter taught by Hung in the circuit of Guimont and Wu to provide a well-known inverter topology. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 2, the prior art does not fairly teach or suggest a source electrode of the PMOS transistor is connected to one end of the first capacitor, a drain electrode of the PMOS transistor is used as an output end of the dynamic response enhancement circuit, and a gate electrode of the PMOS transistor is connected to an output end of a first-level shaping circuit of the output driving circuit; and another end of the first capacitor is connected to a power supply terminal in combination with the limitations of claim 2. Claims 3-5 are objected to merely for being dependent on claim 2. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: International Search Report and International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/CN2023/128807 and associated references CN115987259A, CN102111136A, CN102403988A, CN104682931 and CN113821068A. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to COLLEEN J O'TOOLE whose telephone number is (571)270-1273. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9:00 am - 6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Menatoallah Youssef can be reached at 571-270-3684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.J.O/Examiner, Art Unit 2836 /Menatoallah Youssef/SPE, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 22, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12757498
CIRCUIT FOR PREVENTING CURRENT BACKFLOW, CHIP, AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756391
RF SWITCH STACK WITH CHARGE CONTROL ELEMENTS
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756311
POWER MANAGEMENT INTEGRATED CIRCUIT
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12750042
TOGGLE FLIP-FLOP AND COUNTER INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750041
CLOCK TRANSMISSION CIRCUIT AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
69%
With Interview (+10.9%)
3y 2m (~1y 10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 632 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month