Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/248,010

BISECTED SURFBOARD INSERT

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Jun 24, 2025
Priority
Jun 26, 2024 — provisional 63/664,219
Examiner
BRADEN, SHAWN M
Art Unit
3736
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Surfmigo LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
764 granted / 1145 resolved
-3.3% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1165
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
33.4%
-6.6% vs TC avg
§102
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§112
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1145 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 3, is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 3, the meets and bounds of this claim are not understood. No initial mode has been defined in the claims, so its not clear what the term -carry mode- would require? Is carry mode an empty devise? Or a full devise with a surfboard and a handle? Claim Interpretation The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(f): (f) Element in Claim for a Combination. – An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. This application includes one or more claim limitations that use the word “means” or “step” but are nonetheless not being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph because the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure, materials, or acts to entirely perform the recited function. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: the means for housing having a first and second cover. in claim 20. Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are not being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are not being interpreted to cover only the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. If applicant intends to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to remove the structure, materials, or acts that performs the claimed function; or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) does/do not recite sufficient structure, materials, or acts to perform the claimed function. Claim(s) 1-4,7-14,17-20, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Coleman (US Pub No 2016/0083055). With respect to claim 1, Coleman shows a device (100) comprising: a bisected insert extending along a longitudinal axis; the bisected insert having a first cover portion (102) and a second cover portion (114); each of the cover portions having a rigid protective exterior shell with a fixed longitudinal dimension and an interior surface lined having a cushioning element configured to receive opposing ends of a predetermined surfboard; and, each of the cover portions including opposing, joinable interdigitating members (A,B) configured to slidingly couple the first cover portion (102) and the second cover portion (114) along the longitudinal axis by insertion of an insertion member (160) extending from an outer surface of the first portion (102) into a corresponding receiving member extending from an inner surface of the second portion (114); wherein an assembled cover (assemble pieces) formed by the first (102) and second cover portion (114) is dimensioned to be stowed within a case (the case is being claimed in a functional manner and the Coleman reference is capable of being stowed in a case). With respect to claim 2, Coleman shows wherein the bisected insert is made of moisture resistant and UV resistant material (nylon see paragraph 53). With respect to claim 3, Coleman shows wherein the bisected insert is configured to reversibly switch to a carry mode (fig. 4 shows a mode for carrying) . With respect to claim 4, Coleman shows further comprising interlocking features (AB and second set AB) arranged on each of the cover portions configured to reversibly lock the cover portions (102,114) together. With respect to claim 7, Coleman shows wherein a length of the first cover portion (102) and a length of the second cover portion (114) is dimensioned to accommodate the predetermined surfboard (S) (see fig. 6). With respect to claim 8, Coleman shows wherein draining holes (zippers drain water) disposed within the bisected insert are configured to remove fluid from the bisected insert. (paragraph 58, discloses optional water proof zippers so the conventional zippers would drain all zippered seams) With respect to claim 9, Coleman shows wherein a dual-locking system (zipper and Velcro see fig 3b) is configured to securely lock the predetermined surfboard in the bisected insert. With respect to claim 10, Coleman shows a device comprising: a bisected insert (100) extending along a longitudinal axis; the bisected insert having a first cover portion (102) and a second cover portion (114);each of the cover portions having a rigid protective exterior shell (composite shell, shown self-supporting and rigid in figs) with a fixed longitudinal dimension and an interior surface lined having a cushioning element (foam) configured to receive opposing ends of a predetermined surfboard (S); and, each of the cover portions including opposing, joinable interdigitating members (zippers AB) configured to slidingly couple the first cover portion (102) and the second cover portion (114) along the longitudinal axis by insertion of an insertion member (160) extending from an outer surface of the first portion into a corresponding receiving member (112) extending from an inner surface of the second portion (114). With respect to claim 11, Coleman shows wherein an assembled cover (100) formed by the first and second cover portion (114) is dimensioned to be stowed within a case (this is functionally claimed and the Coleman reference is capable of the function). With respect to claim 12, Coleman shows wherein the bisected insert is made of moisture resistant and UV resistant material (nylon plastic and foam see paragraph 53). With respect to claim 13, Coleman shows wherein the bisected insert is configured to reversibly switch to a carry mode (fig. 4a). With respect to claim 14, Coleman shows further comprising interlocking features (310,311,312,313) arranged on each of the cover portions configured to reversibly lock the cover portions together. With respect to claim 17, Coleman shows wherein a length of the first cover portion (102) and a length of the second cover portion (114) is dimensioned to accommodate the predetermined surfboard (S). With respect to claim 18, Coleman shows wherein draining holes (holes in the zippers at the seams) disposed within the bisected insert are configured to remove fluid from the bisected insert. With respect to claim 19, Coleman shows wherein a dual-locking system (zipper and Velcro see fig. 3bis configured to securely lock the predetermined surfboard in the bisected insert. With respect to claim 20, Coleman shows a device (100) comprising: means for housing extending along a longitudinal axis; the means for housing having a first cover portion (102) and a second cover portion (114); each of the cover portions having a rigid protective exterior shell with a fixed longitudinal dimension and an interior surface lined having a cushioning element (foam) configured to receive opposing ends of a predetermined surfboard (S); and, each of the cover portions including opposing, joinable interdigitating members (AB) configured to slidingly couple the first cover portion (102) and the second cover portion (114) along the longitudinal axis by insertion of an insertion member (160) extending from an outer surface of the first portion (102) into a corresponding receiving member (112) extending from an inner surface of the second portion (114); Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 5,6,15,16, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Coleman in view of Allouche (US Pub No. 2010/0006469). Coleman discloses the invention substantially as claimed. However Coleman does not disclose the outer case, Claim 5,15, the case is configured to receive the predetermined surfboard, claim 6,16, wherein at least one handle extends from the case. Allouche teaches an outer case, the case (10) is configured to receive the predetermined surfboard, claim 6,16, wherein at least one handle (62) extends from the case in the same field of endeavor for the purpose of storage and travel protection for a surfboard. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to add the case of Allouche over the top of case of Coleman in order to have more protection for the surfboards. Belt and suspenders type of double protection. Also when the two cases are nested they take up less space while not being used. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHAWN M BRADEN whose telephone number is (571)272-8026. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Orlando E Aviles-Bosques can be reached at 571 270-5531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHAWN M BRADEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 24, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
Sep 14, 2026
Interview Requested
Sep 24, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 24, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741794
COLLATION OF PACKAGES AND METHOD OF RETAINING PACKAGES TOGETHER IN A COLLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12728559
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RECYCLING A BARREL
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722858
OPENING DEVICE FOR ASEPTIC CARTON PACKAGING USED FOR ENTERAL NUTRITION THROUGH CLOSED SYSTEM OR OPEN SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722854
Packaging for use with Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12714261
WOOD BOWL FOR A STAND MIXER AND RELATED METHODS
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.4%)
2y 10m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1145 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month