Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/249,226

OPTICAL ELEMENT, LIGHTING UNIT, AND VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 25, 2025
Examiner
CARTER, WILLIAM JOSEPH
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Nordic Lights OY
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
611 granted / 991 resolved
-6.3% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+38.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1009
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
64.0%
+24.0% vs TC avg
§102
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§112
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 991 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in EUROPE on 6/26/2024. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the EP 24184576.7 application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 6-15, and 17-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by de Lamberterie et al. (2014/0003071). with respect to claim 1, de Lamberterie teaches an optical element (10) for a vehicle headlamp (paragraphs 79-80), wherein the optical element comprises: one or more entry portions (13) for receiving light rays from one or more light sources (11); one or more total internal reflection (TIR) surfaces (14 and/or 16i) configured to receive light rays from the one or more entry portions and to focus, by TIR, the light rays received from the one or more entry portions in a vertical direction (y) and in a horizontal direction (x) (Figs. 4 and/or 6 and/or 7); and one or more exit portions (18i) comprising one or more exit lenses, wherein the one or more exit lenses comprise a plurality of Fresnel structures (paragraph 75) configured to collimate and/or spread (Figs. 4 and/or 6 and/or 7), in the horizontal direction and/or in the vertical direction (Figs. 4 and/or 6 and/or 7), light rays exiting the optical element, wherein the optical element is formed as a monolithic body (paragraph 70). As for claim 2, de Lamberterie teaches wherein the optical element comprises one or more light cutters (“hood” in paragraph 99) configured to form, by TIR, a cutoff profile for light rays passing from the one or more entry portions to the one or more exit lenses (paragraph 99). As for claim 6, de Lamberterie teaches wherein the plurality of Fresnel structures (18i) comprise: ring-shaped Fresnel structures, and/or horizontally and/or vertically stacked rectangular Fresnel structures (Fig. 4). As for claim 7, de Lamberterie wherein the one or more exit portions (18i and 20) comprise one or more exit lenses devoid of Fresnel structures (Fig. 7). As for claim 8, de Lamberterie teaches wherein the plurality of Fresnel structures comprise Fresnel structures of at least two different types (Fig. 6). As for claim 9, de Lamberterie teaches wherein at least one TIR surface (16i) of the one or more TIR surfaces has a first focal point and a second focal point for focusing the light rays received from the one or more entry portions, wherein the first focal point and the second focal point are substantially coincident, or wherein the first focal point and the second focal point are noncoincident (Figs. 4 and/or 6 and/or 7), and optionally wherein one of the first focal point and the second focal point is positioned further from the at least one TIR surface than the other one of the first focal point and the second focal point and/or the first focal point and the second focal point are in different positions in the horizontal direction (Figs. 4 and/or 6 and/or 7). As for claim 10, de Lamberterie teaches wherein the one or more exit lenses comprise a plurality of exit lenses (18i) comprising a plurality of the Fresnel structures (Fig. 4). As for claim 11, de Lamberterie teaches wherein the optical element comprises a plurality of entry portions (13 and 19) for receiving light rays from the one or more light sources (Fig. 7), and a plurality of TIR surfaces (14 and/or 16i) configured to receive light rays from the plurality of entry portions and to focus, by TIR, the light rays received from the plurality of entry portions in the vertical direction (y) and in the horizontal direction (x) (Fig. 7). As for claim 12, de Lamberterie teaches wherein the plurality of TIR surfaces (16i) comprise substantially parallel optical axes for focusing the light rays (Fig. 7). As for claim 13, de Lamberterie teaches wherein the plurality of TIR surfaces (14 and 16i) comprise substantially nonparallel optical axes for focusing the light rays (Fig. 7). As for claim 14, de Lamberterie teaches wherein the one or more exit lenses (18i and 20) comprise a plurality of exit lenses (Fig. 7), wherein: the plurality of exit lenses include at least one exit lens for each of the plurality of TIR surfaces (Fig. 7), and/or a plurality of horizontally and/or vertically adjacent exit lenses. As for claim 15, de Lamberterie teaches wherein at least one of the one or more exit portions comprises only one of the one or more exit lenses (Fig. 4; *note the use of “comprising” language rather “consisting” language only requires a single one of the items 18i to be interpreted as the “exit portions” of the claim). As for claim 17, de Lamberterie teaches wherein the plurality of Fresnel structures of at least one of the one or more exit lenses are configured to spread light rays exiting the optical element at two or more different spread angles (Fig. 6). As for claim 18, de Lamberterie teaches all of the claimed elements, as is discussed above, as well as further teaching a lighting unit (paragraphs 79-87). As for claim 19, de Lamberterie teaches all of the claimed elements, as is discussed above, as well as further teaching a vehicle (paragraphs 79-87). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5 and 16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. With respect to claims 3-5, the prior art does not teach or suggest wherein the optical element comprises one or more light collector surfaces configured to receive light rays reflected by the one or more light cutters, and to reflect, by TIR, the light rays received from the one or more light cutters towards the one or more exit lenses, and optionally wherein:at least one of the one or more light collector surfaces is configured to collimate the light rays received from the one or more light cutters towards the one or more exit lenses, and/or at least one of the one or more light collector surfaces is configured to focus the light rays received from the one or more light cutters in the vertical direction and in the horizontal direction; along with the other limiting elements of claims 1-3. As for claim 16, the prior art does not teach or suggest wherein the plurality of Fresnel structures of at least one of the one or more exit lenses comprise first Fresnel structures configured to collimate light rays exiting the optical element and second Fresnel structures configured to spread light rays exiting the optical element; along with the other limiting elements of claims 1 and 16. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIAM JOSEPH CARTER whose telephone number is (571)272-0959. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ABDULMAJEED AZIZ can be reached at 571-270-5046. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WILLIAM J CARTER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875 12/23/2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 25, 2025
Application Filed
Dec 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601459
Light Assembly for DRL and Turn Functions
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12580330
ELECTRICAL FEED CONNECTOR SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) CIRCUIT BOARDS WITH VARIED PLACEMENT OF WIRE TERMINAL CONNECTION POINTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578513
DIFFUSER TO IMPROVE UNIFORMITY OF HEAD-UP DISPLAY IMAGE BRIGHTNESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571519
WAVELENGTH CONVERSION MODULE, LIGHT EMISSION DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING WAVELENGTH CONVERSION MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571516
LED LIGHT-EMITTING STRUCTURE, LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE, AND PREPARATION METHOD FOR LIGHT-EMITTING STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+38.1%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 991 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month