Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/249,262

SENSOR DEVICE FORMED FROM CONDUCTIVE GRAPHENE FILM

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jun 25, 2025
Examiner
DAVIS, DAVID DONALD
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
UNIVERSITE GRENOBLE ALPES
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
631 granted / 900 resolved
+8.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
941
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
41.6%
+1.6% vs TC avg
§102
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
§112
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 900 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claim 1 is rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,358,797. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because all aspects of the instant claims are wholly encompassed and anticipated by the patent claims, as seen by the chart below. Instant Application US Patent -- 12,358,797 1. A sensor device comprising: a conductive graphene film consisting essentially of one to eight monolayers of carbon atoms, the conductive graphene film covered on at least one side by a graphene support layer of parylene, wherein the graphene film is doped in order to reduce surface resistance, the graphene support layer of parylene contacting with and supporting the conductive graphene film, the graphene support layer of parylene having a thickness of between 5 nm and 5 mm; a detection element configured to sense an environmental change, either of a chemical or a physical nature, said detection element being formed of the conductive graphene film on a portion of the surface of the graphene support layer of parylene, and wherein the graphene support layer of parylene supports the graphene film during operation of the sensor device; an electrode disposed over a selected area of the graphene support layer of parylene, the electrode comprising a conductive graphene film, the conductive graphene film consisting essentially of a graphene film of one to eight monolayers of carbon atoms; wherein the graphene support layer of parylene is deposited by gas phase deposition on a surface of the graphene film, the parylene repairing some defects in said conductive graphene film, without damaging or polluting the conductive graphene film, and without degrading conductivity of the conductive graphene film; and wherein the sensor device is configured for detection. 1. A sensor device comprising: a conductive graphene film consisting essentially of one to eight monolayers of carbon atoms, the conductive graphene film covered on at least one side by a graphene support layer of parylene, the graphene support layer of parylene having an inside surface; the graphene support layer of parylene contacting with and supporting the conductive graphene film; wherein said graphene support layer of parylene is tube-shaped, the graphene support layer of parylene having a thickness of between 5 nm and 5 mm; a detection element configured to sense an environmental change, either of a chemical or a physical nature, said detection element being formed of the conductive graphene film on a portion of the inside surface of the graphene support layer of parylene; and an electrode disposed over a selected area of the graphene support layer of parylene, the electrode comprising a conductive graphene film, the conductive graphene film consisting essentially of a graphene film to one to eight monolayers of carbon atoms; wherein the graphene support layer of parylene supports the electrode during operation of the sensor device, wherein the graphene support layer of parylene is deposited by gas phase deposition on a surface of the graphene film, wherein the graphene support layer of parylene supports the graphene film during operation of the sensor device, the parylene repairing some defects in said conductive graphene film, without damaging or polluting the conductive graphene film, and without degrading conductivity of the conductive graphene film, and wherein the sensor device is configured for detection. Claims 1-4 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1 and 5-7 of copending Application No. 19/249,221. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because all aspects of the instant claims are wholly encompassed and anticipated by the copending claims, as seen by the chart below. This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection because the patentably indistinct claims have not in fact been patented. Instant Application Patent Application – 19/249,221 1. A sensor device comprising: a conductive graphene film consisting essentially of one to eight monolayers of carbon atoms, the conductive graphene film covered on at least one side by a graphene support layer of parylene, wherein the graphene film is doped in order to reduce surface resistance, the graphene support layer of parylene contacting with and supporting the conductive graphene film, the graphene support layer of parylene having a thickness of between 5 nm and 5 mm; a detection element configured to sense an environmental change, either of a chemical or a physical nature, said detection element being formed of the conductive graphene film on a portion of the surface of the graphene support layer of parylene, and wherein the graphene support layer of parylene supports the graphene film during operation of the sensor device; an electrode disposed over a selected area of the graphene support layer of parylene, the electrode comprising a conductive graphene film, the conductive graphene film consisting essentially of a graphene film of one to eight monolayers of carbon atoms; wherein the graphene support layer of parylene is deposited by gas phase deposition on a surface of the graphene film, the parylene repairing some defects in said conductive graphene film, without damaging or polluting the conductive graphene film, and without degrading conductivity of the conductive graphene film; and wherein the sensor device is configured for detection. 2. The sensor device of claim 1, wherein layers of one or more dopants are intercalated between one or more of the graphene layers to reduce the element resistance. 3. The sensor device of claim 1, wherein layers of one or more P-dopants are intercalated between one or more of the graphene layers to reduce the element resistance. 4. The sensor device of claim 1, wherein layers of AuCl3 and/or HNO3 are intercalated between one or more of the graphene layers to reduce the element resistance. 1. A sensor device comprising: a conductive graphene film consisting essentially of one to eight monolayers of carbon atoms, the conductive graphene film covered on at least one side by a graphene support layer of parylene, the graphene support layer of parylene having an planar surface, the graphene support layer of parylene contacting with and supporting the conductive graphene film, the graphene support layer of parylene having a thickness of between 5 nm and 5 mm; a detection element configured to sense an environmental change, either of a chemical or a physical nature, said detection element being formed of the conductive graphene film on a portion of the surface of the graphene support layer of parylene; and wherein the graphene support layer of parylene supports the graphene film during operation of the sensor device; an electrode disposed over a selected area of the graphene support layer of parylene, the electrode comprising a conductive graphene film, the conductive graphene film consisting essentially of a graphene film of one to eight monolayers of carbon atoms; wherein the graphene support layer of parylene is deposited by gas phase deposition on a surface of the graphene film, the parylene repairing some defects in said conductive graphene, film, without damaging or polluting the conductive graphene film, and without degrading conductivity of the conductive graphene film; and wherein the sensor device is configured for detection. 2. The sensor device of claim 1, wherein the detection element comprises a conductive track formed in a detection zone. 3. The sensor device of claim 1, wherein the detection element comprises a meandering conductive track formed in a detection zone. 4. The sensor device of claim 1, wherein the graphene film is doped in order to reduce its surface resistance. 5. The sensor device of claim 1, wherein layers of one or more dopants are intercalated between one or more of the graphene layers to reduce the element resistance. 6. The sensor device of claim 1, wherein layers of one or more P-dopants are intercalated between one or more of the graphene layers to reduce the element resistance. 7. The sensor device of claim 1, wherein layers of AuCl3 and/or HNO3 are intercalated between one or more of the graphene layers to reduce the element resistance. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID D DAVIS whose telephone number is (571)272-7572. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. - 4 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ke Xiao can be reached at 571-272-7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID D DAVIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2627 DDD
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 25, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602106
Ambience-Driven User Experience
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602128
DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING PIXEL DRIVE CIRCUITS AND SENSOR DRIVE CIRCUITS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602121
TOUCH DEVICE FOR PASSIVE RESONANT STYLUS, DRIVING METHOD FOR THE SAME AND TOUCH SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596265
Aiming Device with a Diffractive Optical Element and Reflective Image Combiner
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592178
Display Device Including an Electrostatic Discharge Circuit for Discharging Static Electricity
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+9.1%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 900 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month