Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/249,554

ULTRASONIC TOUCH SENSOR WITH WATER DETECTION

Final Rejection §DP
Filed
Jun 25, 2025
Priority
Dec 06, 2023 — continuation of 12/411,578
Examiner
SHAH, SUJIT
Art Unit
2624
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Infineon Technologies AG
OA Round
2 (Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
280 granted / 423 resolved
+4.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
454
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
71.7%
+31.7% vs TC avg
§102
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
§112
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 423 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-7, 15-16, 19 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1-3, 18-19 of U.S. Patent No. 12,411,578 in view of KHAJEH et al (US Pub 2021/0405809). Please refer to the table below: Claim 1 of the present application. Claim 1 of the U.S. Patent No. 12,411,578. A device, An ultrasonic touch sensor, generate a measurement signal representative of ultrasonic reflected waves produced by a plurality of reflections of an ultrasonic transmit wave transmitted toward a touch structure; wherein the ultrasonic receiver is configured to receive ultrasonic reflected waves produced by a plurality of reflections of the at least one ultrasonic transmit wave and generate a measurement signal representative of the ultrasonic reflected waves; acquire a plurality of samples of the measurement signal based on calculating a distance of the measurement signal relative to a reference signal to generate the plurality of samples; wherein the measurement circuit is configured to: acquire a first plurality of samples of the measurement signal based on calculating a distance of the measurement signal relative to a reference signal to generate the first plurality of samples, calculate a rate of change of the plurality of samples; perform a comparison based on the rate of change and a rate of change threshold; and calculate a rate of change of the first plurality of samples, perform a first comparison based on the rate of change and a rate of change threshold, operate an ultrasonic touch sensor in a first operation mode based on the rate of change satisfying the rate of change threshold, or operate the ultrasonic touch sensor in a second operation mode based on the rate of change not satisfying the rate of change threshold. and operate in the second operation mode based on the rate of change satisfying the rate of change threshold. U.S. Patent No. 12,411,578 doesn’t expressly disclose a device, comprising: one or more processors coupled to one or more memories; In the same field of endeavor, KHAJEH et al (US Pub 2021/0405809) discloses a device for detect touch input based on ultrasonic waves where KHAJEH disclose the device, comprising: one or more processors coupled to one or more memories and the one or more processors configured to execute the touch detection steps (fig. 2; device 200 comprising processor 214 connected to memory 216; par 0050; discloses one or more of the functions described herein can be performed by firmware stored in memory and executed by the touch circuitry 212 and/or ultrasonic touch sensing touch sensing circuitry 206 (or their respective controllers), or stored in program storage 216 and executed by host processor 214); Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to modify the invention disclosed by U.S. Patent No. 12,411,578 to incorporate the teachings of KHAJEH to use processor and memory in the device such that device may execute all the steps using the processors of the device. Claim 2 of the present application. Claim 1 of the U.S. Patent No. 12,411,578. The device of claim 1, wherein the ultrasonic touch sensor comprises a touch structure configured to receive an input associated with a touch. a touch structure comprising a touch surface configured to receive a touch, wherein the touch structure is coupled to the housing and arranged over the package cavity, and wherein the touch structure comprises a touch interface at the touch surface Claim 3 of the present application. Claim 1 of the U.S. Patent No. 12,411,578. The device of claim 1, wherein the first operation mode is associated with a wet environment, and wherein the second operation mode is associated with an air environment. wherein the measurement circuit is configurable in a first operation mode corresponding to an air environment and a second operation mode corresponding to a wet environment Claim 4 of the present application. Claim 2 of the U.S. Patent No. 12,411,578. The device of claim 1, wherein the rate of change corresponds to a slope of the plurality of samples. The ultrasonic touch sensor of claim 1, wherein the rate of change corresponds to a slope of the first plurality of samples. Claim 5 of the present application. Claim 1 of the U.S. Patent No. 12,411,578. The device of claim 1, further comprising: a measurement circuit that is configurable in the first operation mode and the second operation mode. wherein the measurement circuit is configurable in a first operation mode corresponding to an air environment and a second operation mode corresponding to a wet environment Claim 6 of the present application. Claim 1 of the U.S. Patent No. 12,411,578. The device of claim 5, wherein the measurement circuit is configured to obtain the plurality of samples. wherein the measurement circuit is configured to: acquire a first plurality of samples of the measurement signal Claim 7 of the present application. Claim 3 of the U.S. Patent No. 12,411,578. The device of claim 1, wherein the plurality of samples is associated with a predetermined number of samples acquired on a rolling basis. The ultrasonic touch sensor of claim 1, wherein the first plurality of samples is a predetermined number of samples, and wherein the measurement circuit is configured to continuously acquire the first plurality of samples on a rolling basis, continuously calculate the rate of change on the rolling basis, and perform the first comparison on the rolling basis Claim 15 of the present application. Claim 18 of the U.S. Patent No. 12,411,578. A method, comprising: generating, by a device, a measurement signal representative of ultrasonic reflected waves produced by a plurality of reflections of an ultrasonic transmit wave transmitted toward a touch structure; A method of operating an ultrasonic touch sensor, the method comprising: transmitting an ultrasonic transmit wave toward a touch structure of the ultrasonic touch sensor; generating a measurement signal representative of ultrasonic reflected waves produced by a plurality of reflections of the ultrasonic transmit wave; acquiring, by the device, a plurality of samples of the measurement signal based on calculating a distance of the measurement signal relative to a reference signal to generate the plurality of samples; acquiring a plurality of samples of the measurement signal based on calculating a distance of the measurement signal relative to a reference signal to generate the plurality of samples; calculating, by the device, a rate of change of the plurality of samples; performing, by the device, a comparison based on the rate of change and a rate of change threshold; and calculating a rate of change of the plurality of samples; performing a comparison based on the rate of change and a rate of change threshold; and operating, by the device, an ultrasonic touch sensor in a first operation mode based on the rate of change satisfying the rate of change threshold, or operate the ultrasonic touch sensor in a second operation mode based on the rate of change not satisfying the rate of change threshold. operating the ultrasonic touch sensor in a water operation mode based on the rate of change satisfying the rate of change threshold, or operating the ultrasonic touch sensor in an air operation mode based on the rate of change not satisfying the rate of change threshold. Claim 16 of the present application. Claim 18 of the U.S. Patent No. 12,411,578. The method of 15, wherein the first operation mode is associated with a wet environment, and wherein the second operation mode is associated with an air environment. operating the ultrasonic touch sensor in a water operation mode based on the rate of change satisfying the rate of change threshold, or operating the ultrasonic touch sensor in an air operation mode based on the rate of change not satisfying the rate of change threshold Claim 19 of the present application. Claim 19 of the U.S. Patent No. 12,411,578. The method of 15, wherein the plurality of samples is associated with a predetermined number of samples acquired on a rolling basis. The method of claim 18, wherein the plurality of samples is a predetermined number of samples acquired on a rolling basis. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 would be allowable when non-statutory double patenting rejection is overcome. With respect to claim 1, Lee et al (US Pub 2016/0345113) discloses a device, (fig. 4; device 400) comprising: one or more processors coupled to one or more memories, (fig. 4; discloses device 400 includes processor 450 connected to memory 440) the one or more processors configured to (par 0140; discloses the processor 450 controls the switching unit 414 so that the ultrasonic transmission signal generated by the ultrasonic TX beamforming unit 411 is transmitted only to the non-contact type ultrasonic transducer (for example, the speaker 417) at an initial stage. The processor 450 controls the switching unit 414 so that the ultrasonic RX beamforming unit 413 receives only the ultrasonic reception signal received from the microphone 418): generate a measurement signal representative of ultrasonic reflected waves produced by a plurality of reflections of an ultrasonic transmit wave transmitted toward a touch structure (par 0184; discloses In step 911, the electronic device receives reflected waves of the ultrasonic waves emitted through the second ultrasonic transducer. The second ultrasonic transducer receives reflected waves having different reflection coefficients according to the kind of contact (or super-proximate) object); and operate an ultrasonic touch sensor in a first operation mode, or operate the ultrasonic touch sensor in a second operation mode (par 0186; discloses In step 915, the electronic device performs a function corresponding to the confirmed kind of medium. If the electronic device recognizes a flooding situation of the electronic device according to the kind of medium, and the electronic device controls various functions thereof in preparation of the flooding situation. For example, when the electronic device recognizes a flooding situation, the electronic device protects an internal circuit by turning off a power supply of the electronic device); However Lee alone or in view of other prior art of record fails to disclose acquire a plurality of samples of the measurement signal based on calculating a distance of the measurement signal relative to a reference signal to generate the plurality of samples; calculate a rate of change of the plurality of samples; perform a comparison based on the rate of change and a rate of change threshold; and operate an ultrasonic touch sensor in a first operation mode based on the rate of change satisfying the rate of change threshold, or operate the ultrasonic touch sensor in a second operation mode based on the rate of change not satisfying the rate of change threshold and it would not have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to modify the invention disclosed by Lee to arrive at the claimed invention as the final result would have been unpredictable. Hence claim 1 comprises allowable subject matter. With respect to claim 8, Lee et al (US Pub 2016/0345113) discloses a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing a set of instructions, (fig. 4; memory 440) the set of instructions comprising: one or more instructions that, when executed by one or more processors of a device, cause the device to (par 0150; discloses the memory 440 stores one or more programs executed by the processor 450): generate a measurement signal representative of ultrasonic reflected waves produced by a plurality of reflections of an ultrasonic transmit wave transmitted toward a touch structure (par 0184; discloses In step 911, the electronic device receives reflected waves of the ultrasonic waves emitted through the second ultrasonic transducer. The second ultrasonic transducer receives reflected waves having different reflection coefficients according to the kind of contact (or super-proximate) object); and operate an ultrasonic touch sensor in a first operation mode or operate the ultrasonic touch sensor in a second operation mode (par 0186; discloses In step 915, the electronic device performs a function corresponding to the confirmed kind of medium. If the electronic device recognizes a flooding situation of the electronic device according to the kind of medium, and the electronic device controls various functions thereof in preparation of the flooding situation. For example, when the electronic device recognizes a flooding situation, the electronic device protects an internal circuit by turning off a power supply of the electronic device); However Lee alone or in view of other prior art of record fails to disclose acquire a plurality of samples of the measurement signal based on calculating a distance of the measurement signal relative to a reference signal to generate the plurality of samples; calculate a rate of change of the plurality of samples; perform a comparison based on the rate of change and a rate of change threshold; and operate an ultrasonic touch sensor in a first operation mode based on the rate of change satisfying the rate of change threshold, or operate the ultrasonic touch sensor in a second operation mode based on the rate of change not satisfying the rate of change threshold and it would not have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to modify the invention disclosed by Lee to arrive at the claimed invention as the final result would have been unpredictable. Hence claim 8 is allowed. Claims 9-14 are allowed for being directly or indirectly dependent on allowed independent claim 8. With respect to claim 15, Lee et al (US Pub 2016/0345113) discloses a method (par 0178; discloses FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating a method of recognizing a surrounding environment by using heterogeneous ultrasonic transducers,) comprising: generating, by a device, a measurement signal representative of ultrasonic reflected waves produced by a plurality of reflections of an ultrasonic transmit wave transmitted toward a touch structure (fig. 4; device 400; par 0184; discloses In step 911, the electronic device receives reflected waves of the ultrasonic waves emitted through the second ultrasonic transducer. The second ultrasonic transducer receives reflected waves having different reflection coefficients according to the kind of contact (or super-proximate) object); and operating, by the device, an ultrasonic touch sensor in a first operation mode, or operate the ultrasonic touch sensor in a second operation mode (par 0186; discloses In step 915, the electronic device performs a function corresponding to the confirmed kind of medium. If the electronic device recognizes a flooding situation of the electronic device according to the kind of medium, and the electronic device controls various functions thereof in preparation of the flooding situation. For example, when the electronic device recognizes a flooding situation, the electronic device protects an internal circuit by turning off a power supply of the electronic device); However Lee alone or in view of other prior art of record fails to disclose acquiring, by the device, a plurality of samples of the measurement signal based on calculating a distance of the measurement signal relative to a reference signal to generate the plurality of samples; calculating, by the device, a rate of change of the plurality of samples; performing, by the device, a comparison based on the rate of change and a rate of change threshold; and operating, by the device, an ultrasonic touch sensor in a first operation mode based on the rate of change satisfying the rate of change threshold, or operate the ultrasonic touch sensor in a second operation mode based on the rate of change not satisfying the rate of change threshold and it would not have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to modify the invention disclosed by Lee to arrive at the claimed invention as the final result would have been unpredictable. Hence claim 15 comprises allowable subject matter. Claims 17-18, 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SUJIT SHAH whose telephone number is (571)272-5303. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9:00 am-6:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Eason can be reached at (571)270-7230. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SUJIT SHAH/Examiner, Art Unit 2624
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 25, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP
May 22, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706057
DRIVER AND DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706053
DISPLAY APPARATUS
1y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12693826
IMAGE DISPLAY METHOD, TERMINAL DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12676101
METHOD FOR ADJUSTING BRIGHTNESS OF AN ELECTRONIC VISUAL DISPLAY
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670315
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, METHOD, COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM, AND SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+11.3%)
2y 8m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 423 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month