Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 19/249,773

Method And System For Forming A Packaging Material

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Jun 25, 2025
Priority
May 28, 2021 — provisional 63/194,418 +1 more
Examiner
LEONG, NATHAN T
Art Unit
1718
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Graphic Packaging International Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
550 granted / 770 resolved
+6.4% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
787
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
51.3%
+11.3% vs TC avg
§102
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
§112
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 770 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 8 and 10-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 8, 12 contains the acronyms PLA, PHA, and PBS which are not clearly defined in the claim. Acronyms and abbreviations must be clearly defined in the claim, especially in the absence of added context. Claim 10 contains the limitation “applying a coating layer to a base material to form an initial coated material, the coating layer extending along a surface of the initial coated material”. From this limitation, a coating layer is applied to form an initial coated material. How does the coating layer extend along a surface of the initial coated material, if the coating layer forms the initial coated material? The dependent claims are likewise rejected as failing to cure the deficiencies of claim 10. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ogilvie WO 01/83118. Per claims 1, 9, 12, Ogilvie teaches a system for forming a material comprising a treatment unit that treats at least a face of a base material comprising applying flame heat along a portion of the face to remove the plurality of fiber portions extending from the face (page 4, lines 20-30), wherein the base material comprising a fibrous material with a plurality of fiber portions extending from the face of the base material (paperboard, see abstract, and fibers, see page 4, lines 20-30), which is followed by application of a clay coating after the flame treatment (page 5, lines 20-30). Per claims 2-5, Ogilvie teaches moving the base material through different stations (in-line, see Fig. 1). Per claim 6, Ogilvie teaches a clay coating (page 5, lines 20-30). Per claim 7, Ogilvie teaches coating the paperboard product with a polymer water-dispersible suspension and applying heat to dry and cure the coating (page 3). Per claim 8, the coating layer applied on the substrate by the coating apparatus is considered a material or article worked upon by the apparatus, which does not limit the apparatus claim (see MPEP 2115). As such, the prior art reads on the claimed invention. Per claims 10, 13, 15, Ogilvie teaches a system for forming a material comprising a coating apparatus for coating a coating layer on the base material to form an initial coated material that extends along a surface (clay coating, page 5, lines 20-30), and a treatment unit to treat a portion of the initial coated material to form the resultant material, by applying localized heat treatment to modify the coating layer (page 5, lines 20-30, second flame treatment to reduce surface debris, e.g., fibers, ), said coating and treatment performed in an in-line apparatus by moving the fibrous material along a line (Fig. 1). Alternatively, Ogilvie teaches application of a coating composition (page 6), followed by heating in a hood dryer (page 8, lines 31-32), which would cure and coalesce the coating. Per claim 11, Ogilvie teaches coating the paperboard product with a polymer water-dispersible suspension and applying heat to dry and cure the coating (page 3). Per claim 12, the coating layer applied on the substrate by the coating apparatus is considered a material or article worked upon by the apparatus, which does not limit the apparatus claim (see MPEP 2115). As such, the prior art reads on the claimed invention. Per claim 14, Ogilvie teaches a clay coating (page 5, lines 20-30). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHAN T. LEONG whose telephone number is (571)270-5352. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10:00-6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gordon Baldwin can be reached on 571-272-5166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATHAN T LEONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 25, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Sep 29, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 20, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765542
METHOD FOR MAKING A NONWOVEN MATERIAL WITH REDUCED QUATERNARY AMMONIUM AFFINITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12769210
LIGHT-CURED ANTI-SLIP STRUCTURE OF SHOE SOLE MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12758924
Method of Preparing Flexible Ceramic Membrane by Combining Manganese Oxide with Layer-by-Layer Assembly Technology
1y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757580
DISPLAY PANEL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12753512
METHOD OF PROCESSING SUBSTRATE, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS
1y 8m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+23.9%)
2y 10m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 770 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month