Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/249,908

VEHICLE CONTROL APPARATUS AND PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 25, 2025
Priority
Jun 28, 2024 — JP 2024-105622
Examiner
EL CHANTI, HUSSEIN A
Art Unit
3669
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
J-QuAD DYNAMICS Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
875 granted / 1035 resolved
+32.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1057
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
§103
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§102
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1035 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 1. This action is responsive to application filed June 25, 2025. Claim Interpretation The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(f): (f) Element in Claim for a Combination. – An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitations are: “an accelerator operation determination unit”, “deceleration control unit” and “parameter acquiring unit” in claims 1-2. Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are being interpreted to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. If applicant does not intend to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph (e.g., by reciting sufficient structure to perform the claimed function); or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 3. Claims 1 and 12-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Taki et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0189578 (referred to hereafter as Taki). As to claims 1 and 12-13, Taki teaches a vehicle control apparatus and medium capable of performing deceleration control in which an own vehicle is decelerated based on road conditions ahead of the own vehicle in a travelling direction using map information, the vehicle control apparatus comprising: an accelerator operation determination unit that determines whether a driver of the own vehicle is operating an accelerator during execution of deceleration control (see para. 27-28); and a deceleration control unit that cancels the deceleration control based on travel information of at least either of the own vehicle and another vehicle traveling in a same direction as the own vehicle in a vicinity of the own vehicle, in response to the accelerator operation determination unit determining that the driver is operating the accelerator during execution of the deceleration control (see para. 29-30 and 32). Allowable Subject Matter 3. Claims 2-11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 4. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HUSSEIN A EL CHANTI whose telephone number is (571)272-3999. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Navid Mehdizadeh can be reached at 571-272-7691. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HUSSEIN ELCHANTI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3669
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 25, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 18, 2026
Interview Requested
Oct 01, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 01, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749401
TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPORT SYSTEM AND TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPORT METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747787
CONTROLLING AN ELECTRICALLY CONTROLLABLE RELEASE BOLT OF A PARKING BRAKE ACTUATOR
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741656
MONITORING PLATFORM FOR A SENSOR FUSION SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12725517
VEHICLE TRAVEL ROUTE PLANNING SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12723890
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CREATING A DIGITAL MAP
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+9.0%)
2y 7m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1035 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month