Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 19/251,801

CELL PRODUCTION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 27, 2025
Priority
Mar 05, 2019 — JP 2019-040036 +2 more
Examiner
JOS, BASIL T
Art Unit
3656
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
I Peace Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
279 granted / 359 resolved
+25.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
376
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
§103
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§102
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 359 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 1-14 are pending and examined below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 20130210130 A1 (“Larcher”). As per Claim 1, Larcher discloses a cell production system, comprising: a robot configured to assist in cell production (¶ 7—“automated cell culture arrangement”; Abstract—“at least one additional tool module, which is configured or configurable to act upon or to monitor the contents of a bioreactor and is movable relative to the at least one closed cell culture module or it is movable relative to one or several components of the at least one closed cell culture module”); a plurality of cell production devices, which includes a closed culture vessel and which is affected by the robot in a one-to-many manner (¶ 19—"the at least one closed cell culture module comprises a manifold, interconnecting tubing and a plurality of valves connecting a plurality of vessels, forming a closed system”; ¶ 11—“allows a tool module to act upon or to monitor several bioreactors or their contents of the at least one closed cell culture module”; ¶ 17—“shared and automatic use of movable tools, such as microscopes, sensors, centrifuges etc., which without disrupting the closed system of the closed cell culture module act upon or monitor different bioreactors”); and a wall structure in which the plurality of cell production devices is disposed spatially separating a hazardous area side in which the robot operates and a safe area side opposite to the hazardous area side (¶ 20—“comprises at least two units, a cell maintenance unit…and a processing unit (or cell processing unit) for cell growth and cell processing”; ¶ 23—“cell processing unit and the cell maintenance unit are separated by an insulating separation wall element”), wherein each of the plurality of cell production devices comprises a double-sided structure with the hazardous area side and the safe area side (¶ 11—“The relative movement of the at least one closed cell culture module with respect to at least one tool module of the automated cell culture arrangement is possible without opening the at least one closed cell culture module or disconnecting it from the arrangement”), and each of the plurality of cell production devices is configured to be maintained from the safe area side regardless of a state of operation of the robot (¶ 27—“The cell processing rack, which preferably fits into the cell processing unit of the housing is removable from the housing for easier installation of the cell culture module, for cleaning and service purposes”). As per Claim 2, Larcher further discloses wherein each of the plurality of cell production devices further comprises a removable cell production cartridge facing the hazardous area side (¶ 19—“individual vessels of the closed cell culture system are preferably movable both with respect to one another and with respect to various tools for manipulation, observation, thermal treatment, irradiation etc. while the system remains closed”), and a driving base facing the safe area side and configured to drive the removable cell production cartridge (¶ 12—“tool modules include manipulator tool modules such as, shakers, peristaltic pumps, actuators for opening and closing valves, actuators or moving mechanisms for displacing modules or other components of the closed cell culture module and/or the tool modules relative to each other”). As per Claim 3, Larcher further discloses wherein the removable cell production cartridge is disposable (¶ 19—“the at least one closed cell culture module comprises a manifold, interconnecting tubing and a plurality of valves connecting a plurality of vessels, forming a closed system”), and the driving base is reusable (¶ 27—“The cell processing rack, which preferably fits into the cell processing unit of the housing is removable from the housing for easier installation of the cell culture module, for cleaning and service purposes”). As per Claim 4, Larcher further discloses wherein a removable cell production cartridge has a window allowing observation of a cell production step by a sensor from the hazardous area side (¶ 12—“monitoring tool modules for monitoring the process and the cell cultures in the bioreactors, such monitoring modules being, a cell imaging device (e.g. comprising a microscope and a camera)”). As per Claim 5, Larcher further discloses: an airflow control system in a space on the hazardous area side, wherein the airflow control system comprises a filtration filter on a discharge side of the wall structure (¶ 20—“In each unit the ambient physical conditions are adjustable individually such as for example temperature and humidity”; ¶ 24—“Preferred embodiments of the housing are designed leak tight and made of appropriate material such that they can be sterilized with hydrogen peroxide vapor”), and an exhaust fan configured to discharge clean air provided by the filtration filter to an outside of the wall structure (¶ 23—“the openings or channels connecting the processing with the maintenance units comprise insulating material such as foamed polystyrene, through which the tubings are lead”), and the airflow control system is configured to control downflow of air flowing from above to below the wall structure, orcontrol upflow of air flowing from below to above the wall structure (¶ 23—“the openings or channels connecting the processing with the maintenance units comprise insulating material such as foamed polystyrene, through which the tubings are lead”). As per Claim 6, Larcher further discloses wherein the plurality of cell production devices is configured to be removed to the safe area side (¶ 27—“The cell processing rack, which preferably fits into the cell processing unit of the housing is removable from the housing for easier installation of the cell culture module, for cleaning and service purposes”). As per Claim 7, Larcher further discloses wherein the wall structure comprises an opening to place a corresponding cell production device of the plurality of cell production devices (¶ 23—“the openings or channels connecting the processing with the maintenance units comprise insulating material such as foamed polystyrene, through which the tubings are lead”), and a shutter configured to move between an open position and a closed position (¶ 23—“the collection of tubings one or more openings or channels for collections of tubings are preferably positioned at an easily accessible location”), and when the corresponding cell production device is inserted into the opening, the shutter is configured to move to the open position by a forward movement of the corresponding cell production device and the corresponding cell production device closes the opening (¶ 11—“relative movement of the at least one closed cell culture module with respect to at least one tool module of the automated cell culture arrangement is possible without opening the at least one closed cell culture module”), and when the corresponding cell production device is removed out from the opening, the shutter is configured to move to the closed position due to a retraction of the corresponding cell production device and close the opening (¶ 27—“The cell processing rack, which preferably fits into the cell processing unit of the housing is removable from the housing”). As per Claim 8, Larcher further discloses wherein the wall structure is a cell surrounding a robot (¶ 20—“the automated cell culture arrangement comprises at least two units, a cell maintenance unit…and a processing unit”). As per Claim 9, Larcher further discloses wherein the wall structure is parallel to a line on which the robot is self-propelled (¶ 34—“stacking of multiple cell maintenance racks and/or cell processing racks”). As per Claim 10, Larcher further discloses: a shuttle configured to transport the plurality of cell production devices between a stationing location of the robot and storage locations of the plurality of cell production devices (¶ 34—“a movable carrier such as an elevator”; ¶ 92—“transports the cell imaging device 1104 and the cell wash/concentration device 1105 to each cell processing unit level”), wherein the wall structure is provided at the stationing location of the robot or at the storage locations of the plurality of cell production devices (¶ 27—“The cell processing rack, which preferably fits into the cell processing unit of the housing”; ¶ 34—“stacking of multiple cell maintenance racks and/or cell processing racks”). As per Claim 11, Larcher further discloses wherein the driving base comprises a driving unit (¶ 12—“peristaltic pumps, actuators for opening and closing valves, actuators or moving mechanisms for displacing modules or other components”), and an outside air blocking member covering the driving unit (¶ 24—“the housing are designed leak tight and made of appropriate material such that they can be sterilized”), and the cell production system is configured to be maintained by removing the outside air blocking member (¶ 27—“The cell processing rack, which preferably fits into the cell processing unit of the housing is removable from the housing for easier installation of the cell culture module, for cleaning and service purposes”). As per Claim 12, Larcher further discloses wherein the robot comprises a first sensor near an end-effector (¶ 12—“monitoring tool modules for monitoring the process and the cell cultures in the bioreactors, such monitoring modules being, a cell imaging device (e.g. comprising a microscope and a camera), or any kind of sensor technology device such as a pH and temperatures sensors”), and the first sensor is configured to carry out at least one of a confirmation of a state of the driving base, a correction of target position and posture for mounting of the removable cell production cartridge onto the driving base, a confirmation of true or false of a content that is housed in a fluid feeder, a correction of a target position and a posture for mounting of the fluid feeder on the removable cell production cartridge, a confirmation of fluid level change in at least one of the fluid feeder or the removable cell production cartridge, a confirmation of separation of a source cell to be induced, a confirmation of mixture of an inducing factor, a color tone analysis of culture medium pH, or a confirmation of a state of the removable cell production cartridge (¶ 12—“monitoring tool modules for monitoring the process and the cell cultures in the bioreactors, such monitoring modules being, a cell imaging device (e.g. comprising a microscope and a camera), or any kind of sensor technology device such as a pH and temperatures sensors”). As per Claim 13, Larcher further discloses wherein the robot is configured to carry a second sensor that is a camera or an ultrasonic sensor comprising high-magnification lens, to the removable cell production cartridge (¶ 12—“a cell imaging device (e.g. comprising a microscope and a camera)”), and cells or cell mass in the removable cell production cartridge are measured using the second sensor (¶ 18—“can monitor cell growth in a large number of bioreactors”). As per Claim 14, Larcher further discloses wherein the robot is configured to carry out at least one of mounting and unmounting of the removable cell production cartridge onto the driving base, or mounting of a fluid feeder to the removable cell production cartridge (¶ 12—"actuators or moving mechanisms for displacing modules or other components of the closed cell culture module and/or the tool modules relative to each other”). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BASIL T JOS whose telephone number is (571)270-5915. The examiner can normally be reached 11:00 - 8:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, THOMAS WORDEN can be reached at (571) 272-4876. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Basil T. Jos/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3658
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678940
TENSION ESTIMATION DEVICE, LIFE EVALUATION DEVICE, AND ROBOT SYSTEM
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12685079
Modular Material Handling Robot Platform
1y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673418
POWER ASSIST SYSTEM AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12639949
Control Method, Electronic Device and Storage Medium
1y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12632834
METHOD AND INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) SYSTEM FOR PREDICTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SMART GAS PIPELINE
1y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 8m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 359 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month