Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 19/252,408

METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PRODUCING BEADED POLYMERIC FIBERS WITH ADVANCED THERMOREGULATING PROPERTIES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 27, 2025
Priority
Feb 13, 2019 — provisional 62/804,837 +2 more
Examiner
LEE, EDMUND H
Art Unit
1789
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
808 granted / 1164 resolved
+4.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1198
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
48.2%
+8.2% vs TC avg
§102
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1164 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hartmann et al (USPN 7244497) in view of CN101845675. Regarding claim 1, Hartmann et al teach: A system for making a microfiber including biomass (Hartmann et al: col 9:25-col 10:24; col 26:34-47; col 28: 7-17; fig 3, specifically core/sheath fibers), the system comprising: a coaxial spinneret having an inner conduit and an outer conduit (Hartmann et al: col 26:34-47; col 28: 7-17; fig 3, specifically core/sheath fibers); a coagulation bath opposite the coaxial spinneret, the coagulation bath including one or more solvents (Hartmann et al: col 26:34-47; col 28: 7-17; fig 3, specifically core/sheath fibers); a source of biomass in communication with the outer conduit (Hartmann et al: col 26:34-47; col 28: 7-17; fig 3, specifically core/sheath fibers); and a source of a phase-change material (PCM) in communication with the inner conduit (Hartmann et al: the core material is a temperature regulating material such as a phase change material; col 26:34-47; col 28: 7-17; fig 3, specifically core/sheath fibers). However, Hartmann et al do not teach a grounded bath; and a potentiostat positioned to provide a voltage between the spinneret and the coagulation bath. CN101845675 teaches a wet electrospinning process and system to produce long cellulosic fibers with simple operation, good orientation effect, easy control and low cost, wherein the wet electrospinning includes a grounded bath having an earthing device and a step of applying a voltage that inherent must include a potentiostat (paras. 0003, 0005, 0006, 0008, 0010, 0013, 0015-0024; and fig 1). Since Hartmann et al and CN101845675 are analogous with respect to spinning cellulosic fibers, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to incorporate the grounded coagulation bath and potentiostat of CN101845675 in order to simplify the operation, achieve good orientation effect, obtain easy control and lower costs. Regarding claim 2, Hartmann et al teach the inner conduit having a first flow diameter and the outer conduit having a second flow diameter, wherein the first/inner member 43 can have a much smaller diameter than the second/outer member (figs 3), but does not teach the claimed ratio. Since the claimed ratio is well-known in the core/sheath fiber art, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to design the claimed conduits of Hartmann et al to have the claimed diameter ratio in order to form diverse fiber having desired characteristics. Regarding claim 3, such is taught by the above combination of Hartmann et al and CN101845675 since CN101845675 teaches the distance between the spinneret and bath being 8-30cm (CN101845675: para. 0005). Regarding claim 4, such is taught by Hartmann et al (col 28:20-22). Regarding claim 5, such is taught by Hartmann et al (col 3:20-32). Regarding claim 6, such is taught by Hartmann et al (col 13:66-col 14:38). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDMUND H LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-1204. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 9AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xiao (Sam) Zhao can be reached on 571-270-5343. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. EHL /EDMUND H LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1744
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12697757
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING AN INTERIOR COMPONENT FOR VEHICLES
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692350
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANUFACTURING POLYMER COMPONENTS USING A SLURRY
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686171
Improved Method and Kit for Three-Dimensional Printing
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12668022
THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTING
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661844
INSERT FOR VACUUM FORMING
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+17.9%)
3y 0m (~1y 11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1164 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month