Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/255,586

ANIMAL HEALTH AND SAFETY SYSTEM AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 30, 2025
Examiner
RODZIWICZ, AARON M
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Equine Safety Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
395 granted / 560 resolved
+18.5% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
580
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
41.4%
+1.4% vs TC avg
§102
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 560 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group II in the reply filed on 12/23/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 1-4, 11-23 withdrawn (and canceled) from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/23/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 5-10, 24-40 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 5, line 1 states “an animal health and safety system” but fails to positively claim any structural features which make up said system. Applicant should amend to clearly and distinctly point out the limitations of the claim. Regarding claim 5, lines 1-4 state “designed for at least one selected from the group consisting of serve, advise, alert, analyze, assess, diagnose, evaluate, film, log, monitor, photograph, video, research, store, transmit or otherwise communicate” which is indefinite as it is unclear how any of the stated functions are accomplished as there appears to be no structures, other than platforms and/or programs, that could accomplish each of the stated functions. Applicant should amend to clearly and distinctly point out the limitations of the claims. Claim 11 is rejected in the same manner. Regarding claim 5, line 5 states “monitoring and sensing capabilities” which is indefinite as it is unclear what the monitoring and sensing capabilities are. Applicant should amend to clearly and distinctly point out the limitations of the claim. Claim 5 recites the limitation "the group" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Regarding claim 5, lines 6-8 state “to obtain data-information” which is indefinite as it is unclear how the data is obtained, housed or stored without any type of storage or memory and how the data is interpreted without any type of processor. Applicant should amend to clearly and distinctly point out the limitations being claimed. Claim 8 recites the limitation "the sensing" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Regarding claim 10, line 3 states the term “can” which is indefinite as it is unclear if the device is required to perform multiple functions or not. Applicant should amend to clearly and distinctly point out the limitations of the claim. Regarding claim 10, line 3 states “perform multiple functions” which is indefinite as it is unclear what multiple functions are being referred to. Applicant should amend to clearly and distinctly point the limitations of the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 5-10, 24-40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Young (US 2019/0254599). Regarding claims 5, 7-8, 10, 24-38, as best understood, Young discloses an animal health and safety system designed for at least one selected from the group consisting of serve, advise, alert, analyze, assess, diagnose, evaluate, film, log, monitor, photograph, video, research, store, transmit or otherwise communicate, for the well-being of a living animal(s), via platforms and/or programs, by monitoring and sensing capabilities from at least one device/monitor/sensor to obtain data-information directly from the living animal comprising: the data-information ([0030] the sensor assembly 104 may include a variety of sensors, sensor configurations, and substrates for detecting physiological signals, vital signs, and other signals indicative of a subject's health or condition and [0032] the controller 106 may be configured to carry out various steps to operate the monitoring system 100, including controlling elements of the monitoring system 100, data acquisition, data transfer, data storage, data retrieval, data processing, reporting, power management, and so on) obtained directly from the living animal ([0031] configured for detecting and monitoring animal subjects, such as companion animals, domestic animals, lab animals, wild animals, and so on) is from at least one device/monitor/sensor (100, 104, 114) selected from the group consisting of microfluidics, nano-fluidics, photo-video image detection techniques, sound analytics, nano-biosensors, serodiagnosis, infectious disease detection, molecular biology diagnosis, biochem sensors, metabolic monitoring, breadth/breathing analysis/monitoring, medication patches, stress detection, virus-pathogen detection, contagion, analysis detection and prevention, iontophoretic drug delivery, antibiotic biosensor detection of sub-therapeutic usage causing antibiotic resistance preventing enteric and respiratory diseases, maximum residue limit biosensors for pharmacologically active antibiotic substances and metabolites, rapid detection of the presence or absence of biomarkers and specific chemicals of life-death and health importance, surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-multiple platform, radio-frequency identification tracking of health related behaviors, total quality health management of the animal and animal-to-human contagion real-time device/monitor/sensor detection of zoonotic diseases [0030] Non-limiting examples of sensors include electrocardiogram (“ECG”) sensors, blood pressure sensors, optical sensors, oxygenation sensors, oxygen saturation sensors, respiration sensors, temperature sensors, glucose sensors, muscle activity sensors, and so on. As such, sensors in the sensor assembly 104 may include various electrodes, optical sources and detectors, pressure components, force components, chemical detectors, and others. In some implementations, the sensor assembly 104 may include sensors for determining the subject's activity, such as motion, impact and duration of activity, and so on. Such sensors may therefore include motion sensors (e.g. accelerometers), location sensors (e.g. GPS sensors), and others.). Regarding claims 6, 9, as best disclosed, Young discloses wherein the at least one device/monitor/sensor (100, 104, 114) to obtain data-information ([0030] the sensor assembly 104 may include a variety of sensors, sensor configurations, and substrates for detecting physiological signals, vital signs, and other signals indicative of a subject's health or condition and [0032] the controller 106 may be configured to carry out various steps to operate the monitoring system 100, including controlling elements of the monitoring system 100, data acquisition, data transfer, data storage, data retrieval, data processing, reporting, power management, and so on) directly from the living animal ([0031] configured for detecting and monitoring animal subjects, such as companion animals, domestic animals, lab animals, wild animals, and so on) is borne by a body covering in contact with the animal ([0047] The sensor assembly 104 may be configured to attach directly to the animal subject. The sensor assembly 104 may be part of, attached to, or incorporated into a wearable item or product that may be coupled to the animal subject. For instance, the sensor assembly 104 may be attached to, or part of, a harness 300A or 300B. The sensor assembly 104 may also be attached to, part of, or incorporated into a collar, a belt, a strap a vest, or other wearable item.). Regarding claim 39, as best understood, Young discloses wherein the data-information ([0030] the sensor assembly 104 may include a variety of sensors, sensor configurations, and substrates for detecting physiological signals, vital signs, and other signals indicative of a subject's health or condition and [0032] the controller 106 may be configured to carry out various steps to operate the monitoring system 100, including controlling elements of the monitoring system 100, data acquisition, data transfer, data storage, data retrieval, data processing, reporting, power management, and so on) directly from the living animal ([0031] configured for detecting and monitoring animal subjects, such as companion animals, domestic animals, lab animals, wild animals, and so on) from the at least one device/monitor/sensor is transmitted or otherwise communicated to a smart device or wearable ([0060] an end user may receive the data, signals and information from a number of patients on a personal device, including a smart watch, smartphone, tablet, laptop, computer and so forth, and be able to take action accordingly.). Regarding claim 40, as best understood, Young discloses wherein the living animal is a canine ([0031] configured for detecting and monitoring animal subjects, such as companion animals, domestic animals, lab animals, wild animals, and so on). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Examiner lists referenced documents on PTO-892 because the references present other/alternative or conceptual designs similar in scope that illustrate relevant features, which may demonstrate the level of novelty in comparison to Applicant’s inventive submission. The record relates to Applicant’s identified material and Examiner’s discovered references concerning Applicant’s subject matter relevant for a patentability determination. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AARON M RODZIWICZ whose telephone number is (571)272-6611. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 10 am - 6 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Michener can be reached at (571) 272-1467. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AARON M RODZIWICZ/Examiner, Art Unit 3642 /MONICA L PERRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3644
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 30, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Apr 16, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595044
AIRFLOW INTERRUPTING DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593829
ARTHROPOD BLOOD WARMING APPARATUS, SYSTEM & METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12568941
DEVICE FOR SORTING INSECTS, ALLOWING THE SEPARATION OF CRAWLING INSECTS FROM THE REST OF A MIXTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568942
INSECT FARMING WITH PRE-DOSED UNITS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564175
DRIVING ROBOT FOR AGRICULTURAL TASKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+17.5%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 560 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month