Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/255,833

DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jun 30, 2025
Priority
Dec 10, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0182619
Examiner
GYAWALI, BIPIN
Art Unit
2625
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
60%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
230 granted / 390 resolved
-3.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
421
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
70.0%
+30.0% vs TC avg
§102
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 390 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The applicant has amended their application as follows: Amended: 1 and 13 Cancelled: 6 and 17 Added: None Therefore, claims 1-5, 7-12 and 14-20 are currently pending in the instant application. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 06/03/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Specifically, the office has to respectfully disagree with an argument that the prior art does not disclose the limitation “a timing controller configured to adjust the power voltage based on at least one of a brightness value according to an externally set brightness mode and a luminance value of the image data, and output the power voltage control signal indicating a voltage value of the adjusted power voltage”. Pyun discloses adjusting the gamma power voltage based on a load of the input image data which is calculated by averaging grayscale values in the input image data (Para. 0051). The average grayscale value is interpreted to read on “luminance” of the input image. Therefore, Pyun teaches “a timing controller (140) configured to adjust the power voltage based on at least one of a brightness value according to an externally set brightness mode and a luminance value of the image data (Para. 0052-0053, average grayscale value), and output the power voltage control signal indicating a voltage value of the adjusted power voltage” (Para. 0052). Furthermore, Yoo discloses adjusting the power voltage, i.e. the adjustment of ELVSS would change the power voltage ELVDD-ELVSS, to display an image with certain luminance or brightness setting (Para. 0071). Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teaching of Yoo to adjust the gamma power voltage based on the brightness setting as the gamma voltage would affect the brightness (Pyun; Fig. 4; Para. 0106). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-8 and 11-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being anticipated by Pyun et al. (US 2021/0012705 A1, hereinafter “Pyun”). As to claim 1, Pyun (Fig. 1) discloses a display device (100) comprising: a display panel (110) comprising pixels (PX1, PX2, PX3) arranged therein; a power supply unit (160) configured to generate a power voltage (AVDD) based on a power voltage control signal (C_AVDD2; Para. 0055); a gamma voltage generator (170) configured to generate gamma voltages by dividing a voltage between the power voltage and a reference voltage (Para. 0084, OV); a data driver (130) configured to convert image data (DATA2) into a data voltage (DL1, DLj..) using the gamma voltages (GAMMAS) and apply the data voltage to the pixels (PX1, PX2..), a timing controller (140) configured to adjust the power voltage based on at least one of a brightness value according to an externally set brightness mode and a luminance value of the image data (Para. 0051-0053, a load of the input image data or average grayscale value), and output the power voltage control signal indicating a voltage value of the adjusted power voltage (Para. 0051-0052), wherein the gamma voltages (GAMMAS) have a voltage range determined between the power voltage (V1) and the reference voltage (0V; Para. 0084), wherein the voltage range of the gamma voltages is varied as the power voltage is varied (Fig. 5B element V1_C; Para. 0094), and wherein the data voltage has a voltage range (Range2_C) configured to vary according to the voltage range of the gamma voltages (Para. 0095). The above rejection also stands fort eh corresponding method of claim 13. As to claim 2, Pyun discloses wherein the voltage value of the power voltage varies in proportion to the brightness value or the luminance value (Fig. 6; Para. 0106). The above rejection also stands fort eh corresponding method of claim 14. As to claim 3, Pyun (Fig. 5A) discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein the gamma voltages comprise: a highest gamma voltage (GAMMA1) having a highest voltage level corresponding to a highest gradation (Para. 0084-0085), and a lowest gamma voltage (GAMMA9) having a lowest voltage level corresponding to a lowest gradation (Para. 0084-0086). The above rejection also stands fort eh corresponding method of claim 15. As to claim 4, Pyun (Fig. 3) discloses the display device of claim 1, further comprising a storage unit (150) configured to store a plurality of voltage values of the power voltage (Para. 0053), each of the plurality of voltage values of the power voltage corresponding to one of a plurality of brightness values or a plurality of luminance values (Para. 0053). As to claim 5, Pyun (Fig. 3) discloses the display device of claim 4, wherein the timing controller (140) is configured to obtain a brightness value or a luminance value from an externally applied control signal or image signal (Para. 0051-0052) and generate the power voltage control signal (C_AVDD2) based on the voltage value of the power voltage corresponding to the brightness value or the luminance value obtained from the storage unit (150; Para. 0053-0055). The above rejection also stands fort eh corresponding method of claim 16. As to claim 6, Pyun discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein the gamma voltages (GAMMAS) have a voltage range determined between the power voltage and the reference voltage (Para. 0084), wherein the voltage range of the gamma voltages is varied as the power voltage is varied (Fig. 5A; Para. 0083-0084), and wherein the data voltage has a voltage range configured to vary according to the voltage range of the gamma voltages (Para. 0085-0086). The above rejection also stands fort eh corresponding method of claim 17. As to claim 7, Pyun discloses the display device of claim 6, wherein a power consumption of the display device is varied according to the voltage range of the data voltage (Para. 0091, 0104, 0111). As to claim 8, Pyun (Fig. 5B) discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein the power voltage decreases as the brightness value or the luminance value decrease, and a power consumption of the display device decreases as the power voltage decreases (Para. 0104). The above rejection also stands fort eh corresponding method of claim 18. As to claim 11, Pyun (Fig. 5B) disclose the display device of claim 3, wherein the highest gamma voltage of the gamma voltages varies (GAMMA1) while the lowest gamma voltage of the gamma voltages remains fixed (GAMMA9) when the power voltage varies (Para. 0094-0095). As to claim 12, Pyun (Fig. 2) discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein each of at least one of the pixels includes a driving transistor (T1), a light-emitting element (LED) connected to the driving transistor, and a control circuit (T2) configured to control an amount of driving current applied to the light-emitting element via the driving transistor (Para. 0061-0062), wherein the driving transistor is an oxide semiconductor thin-film transistor (Para. 0064), and wherein at least one of a plurality of transistors in the control circuit is an oxide semiconductor thin- film transistor (Para. 0064). Claim(s) 10 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Pyun as applied to claims 1 and 13 above, and further in view of Cheng (US 2023/0386415 A1, hereinafter “Cheng”). As to claim 10, Pyun does not disclose the display device of claim 1, wherein the gamma voltages are set differently for each color of the pixels, the gamma voltages for a first pixel of a red color being set higher than the gamma voltages for a second pixel of a green color, and the gamma voltages for a third pixel of a blue color being set higher than the gamma voltages for the first pixel. However, Cheng teaches wherein the gamma voltages are set differently for each color of the pixels (Para. 0077), the gamma voltages for a first pixel of a red color being set higher than the gamma voltages for a second pixel of a green color (Para. 0077), and the gamma voltages for a third pixel of a blue color being set higher than the gamma voltages for the first pixel (Para. 0077). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teaching of Cheng to different gamma voltages for different color pixels in the device disclosed by Pyun. The motivation would have been to increase luminous efficiency (Cheng; Para. 0086). The above rejection also stands fort eh corresponding method of claim 20. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 9 and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant‘s disclosure. Kim (US 2015/0243230 A1) discloses generating different gamma voltages for different color pixels (Para. 0056). Bellers et al. (US 12,620,370 B2) discloses selecting gamma adjustment with respect to brightness setting (Fig. 9; Col. 6 lines 56-67). THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BIPIN GYAWALI whose telephone number is (571)272-1597. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-4:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Will Boddie can be reached at 571-272-0666. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BIPIN GYAWALI Primary Examiner Art Unit 2625 /BIPIN GYAWALI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2625
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 30, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 03, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743991
DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12718742
MICRO LIGHT EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12682554
CONTEXT-BASED OBJECT VIEWING WITHIN 3D ENVIRONMENTS
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675160
EXTENDED REALITY INTERFACE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676099
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD CONTROLLING SIGNAL PROVIDED TO PROCESSOR
1y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
60%
With Interview (+0.5%)
2y 10m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 390 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month