Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/255,909

POUCH CONTAINMENT SYSTEM FOR THERMAL PROTECTION USING FIRE RETARDANT OR EXTINGUISHING MATERIALS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 30, 2025
Priority
Dec 06, 2024 — provisional 63/728,980 +3 more
Examiner
LAIOS, MARIA J
Art Unit
1727
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Enevate Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
529 granted / 765 resolved
+4.2% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 12m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
795
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
55.0%
+15.0% vs TC avg
§102
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
§112
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 765 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/29/2026 has been entered. Claim Status Claims 1 and 11 have been amended; support is found in [0076]. Claims 1-20 are currently pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 7, 9-15, 17, 19 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Toyomura (WO 2024/172137A1, US 2025/0357569 is used as an English equivalent). As to claim 1. Toyomura et al. discloses a battery safety system, comprising: a chamber (bag-[0045]) configured for placement between a plurality of battery cells [0150], wherein: the chamber (bag) comprises a fire-retardant composition (fire retardant and water or hydrogel 0136, 0164, 0045) configured to suppress combustion during a thermal runaway event, the chamber comprises a hermetically sealed metallic pouch [0045] (does not leak) having welded seams [0046] and being configured to contain the fire-retardant composition [0048], wherein the fire-retardant composition expands [(swollen-0152]) within the hermetically sealed metallic pouch under thermal stress to expand the pouch and create a thermal barrier between adjacent battery cells while remaining contained within the hermetically sealed metallic pouch [0150]. As to claim 2. Toyomura et al. discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the fire-retardant composition comprises a plurality of mica [0081]. As to claim 3. Toyomura et al. discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the chamber comprises a metal enclosure (metal resin laminate) filled with a fire-retardant fluid (water, clay, hydrogel) and additives [0129] (UV absorber, antioxidant, organic solvent, inorganic filler other than the water-swellable clay mineral, viscosity adjusters such as a thickening agent, a crosslinking agent, and a flame retardant). As to claim 4. Toyomura et al. discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the fire-retardant composition comprises a gel or a polymer to form a fire-resistant hydrogel [0010]. As to claim 5. Toyomura et al. discloses the system of claim 1, wherein a fire-retardant layer (the hydrogel within the bag 0045) is distributed across one or more gaps between the plurality of battery cells [0150] (discloses the heat absorber can be sandwiched between cells). As to claim 7. Toyomura et al. discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the fire-retardant composition expands volumetrically when heated to create cell separation [0150] (the hydrogel swells). As to claim 9. Toyomura et al. discloses the system of claim 1, wherein: the fire-retardant composition comprises one more of water [0045], and phosphorus-based compounds [0136]. As to claim 10. Toyomura et al. discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the fire-retardant composition is housed in a sealed pouch (figure 2). As to claim 11. . Toyomura et al. discloses a method, comprising: forming a fire-retardant composition configured to suppress combustion during a thermal runaway event [0033]; and filling a chamber (bag-[0045]) between a plurality of battery cells [0150] with the fire-retardant composition (water, fire retardant or hydrogel [0136, 0164, 0045]), wherein: filling the chamber comprises sealing the fire-retardant composition [00 45] within a welded metallic pouch [0051] (metal layer on a resin film and is sealed, thus welded) positioned between the battery cells [0150], and the fire-retardant composition expands under thermal stress to create physical separation between the battery cells [0152]-the hydrogel swells), and the fire-retardant composition expands within the welded metallic pouch under thermal stress to expand the welded metallic pouch and create physical separation between the battery cells while remaining contained within the welded metallic pouch [0150, 0045]. As to claim 12, Toyomura et al. discloses the method of claim 11, wherein forming the fire-retardant composition comprises adding one or more of a plurality of mica flakes [0081]. As to claim 13. Toyomura et al. discloses the method of claim 11, wherein the chamber comprises a metal (metal resin laminate 0051) enclosure filled with a fire-retardant fluid (water, clay or hydrogel) and additives [0129] (UV absorber, antioxidant, organic solvent, inorganic filler other than the water-swellable clay mineral, viscosity adjusters such as a thickening agent, a crosslinking agent, and a flame retardant). As to claim 14. Toyomura et al. discloses the method of claim 11, wherein the fire-retardant composition comprises a gel or a polymer to form a fire-resistant hydrogel. [0010] As to claim 15. Toyomura et al. discloses the method of claim 11, wherein filling a chamber [0045] comprises distributing a fire-retardant layer across one or more gaps between the plurality of battery cells [0150] (discloses the heat absorber can be sandwiched between cells). As to claim 17. Toyomura et al. discloses the method of claim 11, wherein the fire-retardant composition expands volumetrically when heated to create cell separation [0150] (hydrogel swells). As to claim 19. Toyomura et al. discloses the method of claim 11, wherein: the fire-retardant composition comprises one more of water [0045] and phosphorus-based compounds [0136]. As to claim 20. Toyomura et al. discloses the method of claim 11, wherein the fire-retardant composition is housed in a sealed pouch [0045]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 6, 8, 16 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Toyomura (WO 2024/172137A1, US 2025/0357569 is used as an English equivalent) in view of Fujikawa et al. (US 9293794 B2). As to claim 6 and 16. Toyomura discloses the system of claim 1 and 11, wherein the chamber is formed of an aluminum resin laminate but does not disclose the chamber is formed from stainless steel or carbon steel with a corrosion-resistant coating. Fujikawa et al. discloses a secondary battery module with a cooling unit (20). The housing of the cooling unit is made of a laminated sheet where in the base layer can be formed of aluminum or stainless steel (col. 3 lines 25-26). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the application was filed to replace the aluminum with the stainless steel because both are known materials used in a laminated housing and the simple substitution of one known element for another is likely to be obvious when predictable results are achieved. (see MPEP § 2143, B.). As to claims 8 and 18, Toyomura discloses of claims 1 and 11, where in the heat absorber is between the battery cells but does not depicts the system/method is applied across battery submodules, modules, and pack enclosures. Fujikawa et al. discloses a secondary battery module with a cooling unit (20). The cooling unit (20) is located across multiple battery cells (thus submodules) and pack enclosures (figure 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the application was effectively filed to place the heat absorber/cooling unit across multiple batteries and pack enclosures because this would prevent a thermal runaway/abnormally heated cell from occurring. The combination of familiar elements is likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results (see MPEP § 2143, A.). In this case, both Toyomura and Fujikawa add a heat absorber between cells to prevent the thermal runaway from spreading to additional batteries. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 2022/0013825 A1 of De Wilde et al. discloses a spacer 2 that expands but is not in the form of a sealed pouch as is instantly claimed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARIA J LAIOS whose telephone number is (571)272-9808. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 10am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Barbara Gilliam can be reached at 571-272-1330. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Maria Laios/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1727
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 30, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jan 08, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Feb 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 29, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 01, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770960
BUTTON BATTERY SHELL AND BUTTON BATTERY
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12756043
ELECTRIC APPARATUS
4y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756048
Battery Cell Stack and Manufacturing Method Thereof
3y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12738526
BATTERY AND BATTERY WITH SPRING PLATE
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738615
Electrolyte Reinjection Method and Electrolyte-Reinjectable Secondary Battery
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+18.2%)
3y 12m (~2y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 765 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month