Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/256,784

DIFFERENTIAL-SPEED TARGET PRECISE DOCKING AND RECOVERY SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§Other
Filed
Jul 01, 2025
Examiner
BENEDIK, JUSTIN M
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Shenyang Jidong Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
740 granted / 862 resolved
+33.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
878
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
48.5%
+8.5% vs TC avg
§102
32.7%
-7.3% vs TC avg
§112
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 862 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Gundlach et al. (US 20130082137). Gundlach discloses all of the limitations in the claims below: 1. A differential-speed target precise docking and recovery system, comprising: a braking and guiding system (cable management device 416, shuttle cable management 418) configured to reduce target energy, and the braking and guiding system comprising a braking device (cable management device 416 418 420 with shock absorber as well as rail 404 and arm 402) and a docking device (capture cables /trapeze 410 420 422) connected to the braking device; a docking arm (articulating crane 402, 404) configured to drive the docking device to dock with a target (UAV 408); a control system (para 70) configured to acquire state/states information of the docking arm and the target and to control an operation of the docking arm (para 70); and an impact load isolation means configured to: release or optimize a force applied on the docking arm during a docking or braking process of the target, and transfer or transmit a load from the target imposed on the docking arm to the braking and guiding system. (impact isolation means shock absorber, spring damper, Para 73-74, para 13) 2. The system according to claim 1, wherein: the braking and guiding system is further configured to impose constraints on a motion of the target (rail plus shuttle constrain captured motion, Fig. 4c and 6c). 3. The system according to claim 1, wherein: a free end of the docking arm is provided with a retaining member (vehicle hook assembly 428, 602); the docking device is connected to the braking device via a first cable (410 through pullies 414); the impact load isolation means is configured to: enable the docking arm to drive the docking device to dock with the target through the retaining member (hook arm engages cable, cable slides along arm into retainer para 49 and 86 Figs. 6a-b); and enable the retaining member to maintain a fixed connection between the docking device 410/422 and the docking arm 402, 404 before the docking device docks with the target (retaining the cable in the hook during capture); and release the docking device from the retaining member 428, 602 after the docking device docks with the target, allowing the load from the target imposed on the docking arm to be transferred to the braking device (416). 4. The system according to claim 1, wherein: the impact load isolation means comprises a load isolation device (416, 418 impact isolation means shock absorber, spring damper, Para 73-74, para 13) between a servo drive device (disclosed as winch or pay out reel in device) and a driven portion of the docking arm (fully articulated arm 402 see fig 4b); the load isolation device is configured to: maintain a sufficient high-dynamic and high-precision motion capability of the docking arm before the docking device docks with the target to ensure reliable docking between the docking device and the target (Para 73-74); and release a torque transmission between the servo drive device and the driven portion after the docking device docks with the target, allowing the load from the target imposed on the docking arm to be transmitted to the braking device (para 73-74, elements 418 and 416 and cable member 420, 410/422). 5. The system according to claim 4, wherein: the docking device 410 is disposed at a free end of the docking arm (clearly shown in Fig. 4B), and a fixed end of the docking arm is disposed on the braking device (Clearly shown in Fig. 4b). 6. The system according to claim 1, wherein: the braking device comprises at least one of a telescopic mechanism (arm 402), a mobile platform, and a winch (para 73-74). 7. The system according to claim 6, wherein: the telescopic mechanism is provided with a first drive device configured to control a telescopic state of the telescopic mechanism (control to control 402 – para 69). 8. The system according to claim 6, wherein: a fixed end of the telescopic mechanism is disposed on a carrier at a fixed pitch angle (clearly shown in Fig. 7). 9. The system according to claim 6, wherein: a fixed end of the telescopic mechanism is connected to a carrier through a revolute joint (at 302a), and the telescopic mechanism is provided with a second drive device configured to adjust an angle between the telescopic mechanism and the carrier (clearly shown in Fig. 3a-3e). 10. The system according to claim 9, wherein: the second drive device comprises: a limiter disposed between the telescopic mechanism and the carrier, or a rotating mechanism disposed on the revolute joint (302a - clearly understood from Fig. 3a-3e para 68-69). 11. The system according to claim 6, wherein: a movable end of the telescopic mechanism is provided with a cable adjuster, the first cable is connected to the movable end of the telescopic mechanism by the cable adjuster; and the cable adjuster is configured to adjust an extension length of the first cable or a running speed of the first cable (boom 302a-c and cable adjustment means disclosed in para 73-75). 12. The system according to claim 6, wherein: the braking device comprises a telescopic mechanism (arm segments para 69), a winch (disclosed in para 73-74), and a second cable 420; a first end of the second cable is connected to the winch, and a second end is connected to a movable end of the telescopic mechanism (Fig. 4b). 13. The system according to claim 1, wherein: the braking device and/or the guiding arm is rotatable about their respective axes or a common axis (disclosed in para 14 and 69). 14. The system according to claim 1, wherein: the braking device and/or the guiding arm is translatable in a horizontal direction (shuttle para 67 and 76 translating along rail). 15 The rejections of claim 1 and dependents above are applied mutatis mutandis to the limitations of claim 15. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure are related to aircraft capture devices with arms, and attenuating or braking means. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN M BENEDIK whose telephone number is (571)270-7824. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00-3:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Huson can be reached at 571-270-5301. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN M. BENEDIK/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3642 /JUSTIN M BENEDIK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 01, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589871
CONFIGURATION FOR VERTICAL TAKE-OFF AND LANDING SYSTEM FOR AERIAL VEHICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589896
INDUSTRIAL AERIAL ROBOT SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583630
ROBOTIC SYSTEM FOR CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE INSPECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583637
MULTI-USE PLATFORM FOR A MOBILE ROBOT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12551735
Parachute Device for High-Rise Emergency Evacuations
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+10.5%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 862 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month