Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/258,150

IMAGE DECODING METHOD FOR DERIVING WEIGHT INDEX INFORMATION FOR BIPREDICTION, AND DEVICE FOR SAME

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jul 02, 2025
Priority
Jun 14, 2019 — provisional 62/861,989 +4 more
Examiner
PHAM, NAM D
Art Unit
2482
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
503 granted / 554 resolved
+32.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+1.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
580
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§103
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§102
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 554 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Summary This office action for US Patent application 19/258150 is responsive to communications filed on July 2nd, 2025. Currently, claims 1-3 are pending are presented for examination. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. Effective January 1, 1994, a registered attorney or agent of record may sign a terminal disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with 37 CFR 3.73(b). Claims 1-3 inprovisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-2 and 4 of copending Application 18/616984, now US Patent 12,382,020, over claim 1 of copending Application No 17/896317, now US Patent 11,973938 and claim 1 of copending Application No 17/550847, now US Patent 11,457209. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because it is merely in the terminology used in both sets of claims. This is an inprovisional obviousness-type double patenting rejection because the conflicting claims have in fact been patented. Below is a list of limitations that perform the same function. However different terminology is used in both sets to describe the limitations. Conflicting Co-pending Application 18/616984 Instant Application-19/258150- 1.An image decoding method performed by a decoding apparatus, the image decoding method comprising: receiving image information including inter prediction mode information through a bitstream; deriving an inherited affine candidate and a constructed affine candidate based on a neighboring block of a current block, based on the inter prediction mode information; generating a merge candidate list of the current block based on the inherited affine candidate and the constructed affine candidate; selecting one candidate from among candidates included in the merge candidate list; deriving motion information on the current block based on the selected candidate; generating L0 prediction samples and L1 prediction samples of the current block based on the motion information; and generating prediction samples of the current block based on the L0 prediction samples, the L1 prediction samples, and weight information, wherein the weight information is weight information for a bi-prediction and is derived based on a weight index for the selected candidate, wherein the constructed affine candidate includes control point motion vectors (CPMVs), and wherein based on a case that the constructed affine candidate is generated based on {CP0, CP1, CP3}, a weight index for the constructed affine candidate is derived based on a weight index for the CP0, wherein the CP0 is related to a top-left corner of the current block, the CP1 is related to a top-right corner of the current block and the CP3 is related to a bottom-right corner of the current block. Claims 2, 4 1. A decoding apparatus for image decoding, the decoding apparatus comprising: a memory; and at least one processor connected to the memory, the at least one processor configured to: receive image information including inter prediction mode information through a bitstream; derive an inherited affine candidate and a constructed affine candidate based on a neighboring block of a current block, based on the inter prediction mode information; generate a merge candidate list of the current block based on the inherited affine candidate and the constructed affine candidate; select one candidate from among candidates included in the merge candidate list; derive motion information on the current block based on the selected candidate; generate LO prediction samples and Li prediction samples of the current block based on the motion information; and generate prediction samples of the current block based on the LO prediction samples, the LI prediction samples, and weight information, wherein the weight information is weight information for a bi-prediction and is derived based on a weight index for the selected candidate, wherein the constructed affine candidate includes control point motion vectors (CPMVs), and wherein based on a case that the constructed affine candidate is generated based on {CPO, CP1, CP3}, a weight index for the constructed affine candidate is derived based on a weight index for the CPO, wherein the CPO is related to a top-left corner of the current block, the CP 1 is related to a top-right corner of the current block and the CP3 is related to a bottom- right corner of the current block. Claim 2,3 Conflicting Co-pending Application 17/896317 Instant Application-19/258150- 1. (Previously presented) A decoding apparatus for image decoding, the decoding apparatus comprising: a memory; and at least one processor connected to the memory, the at least one processor configured to: receive image information including inter-prediction mode information through a bitstream; generate a merge candidate list of a current block based on the inter-prediction mode information; select one candidate from among candidates included in the merge candidate list; derive motion information on the current block based on the selected candidate; generate LO prediction samples and L1 prediction samples of the current block based on the motion information; and generate prediction samples of the current block based on the LO prediction samples, the L1 prediction samples, and weight information, wherein the weight information is weight information for a bi-prediction and is derived based on a weight index for the selected candidate, wherein the candidates include a constructed affine merge candidate, and the constructed affine merge candidate includes control point motion vectors (CPMVs), wherein based on a case that the constructed affine merge candidate is generated based on {CPO, CP1, CP3}, a weight index for the constructed affine merge candidate is set equal to a weight index for the CPO, wherein the CPO is related to a top-left corner of the current block, the CP 1 is related to a top-right corner of the current block and the CP3 is related to a bottom-right corner of the current block. Claim 1 1. A decoding apparatus for image decoding, the decoding apparatus comprising: a memory; and at least one processor connected to the memory, the at least one processor configured to: receive image information including inter prediction mode information through a bitstream; derive an inherited affine candidate and a constructed affine candidate based on a neighboring block of a current block, based on the inter prediction mode information; generate a merge candidate list of the current block based on the inherited affine candidate and the constructed affine candidate; select one candidate from among candidates included in the merge candidate list; derive motion information on the current block based on the selected candidate; generate LO prediction samples and Li prediction samples of the current block based on the motion information; and generate prediction samples of the current block based on the LO prediction samples, the LI prediction samples, and weight information, wherein the weight information is weight information for a bi-prediction and is derived based on a weight index for the selected candidate, wherein the constructed affine candidate includes control point motion vectors (CPMVs), and wherein based on a case that the constructed affine candidate is generated based on {CPO, CP1, CP3}, a weight index for the constructed affine candidate is derived based on a weight index for the CPO, wherein the CPO is related to a top-left corner of the current block, the CP 1 is related to a top-right corner of the current block and the CP3 is related to a bottom- right corner of the current block. Claim 2,3 Conflicting Co-pending Application 17/550847 Instant Application-19/258150- 1. (Original) An image decoding method performed by a decoding apparatus, the image decoding method comprising: receiving image information including inter-prediction mode information through a bitstream; generating a merge candidate list of a current block based on the inter-prediction mode information; selecting one candidate from among [[the ]]candidates included in the merge candidate list; deriving motion information on the current block based on the selected candidate; generating LO prediction samples and L1 prediction samples of the current block based on the motion information; and generating prediction samples of the current block based on the LO prediction samples, the L1 prediction samples, and weight information, wherein the weight information is weight information for a bi-prediction and is derived based on a weight index for the selected candidate, wherein the candidates include a constructed affine merge candidate, and the constructed affine merge candidate includes control point motion vectors (CPMVs), wherein based on a case that the constructed affine merge candidate is generated based on {CPO, CP1, CP3}, a weight index for the constructed affine merge candidate is set equal to a weight index for the CPO, wherein the CPO is related to a top-left corner of the current block, the CP1 is related to a top-right corner of the current block and the CP3 is related to a bottom-right corner of the current block. Claim 1 1. A decoding apparatus for image decoding, the decoding apparatus comprising: a memory; and at least one processor connected to the memory, the at least one processor configured to: receive image information including inter prediction mode information through a bitstream; derive an inherited affine candidate and a constructed affine candidate based on a neighboring block of a current block, based on the inter prediction mode information; generate a merge candidate list of the current block based on the inherited affine candidate and the constructed affine candidate; select one candidate from among candidates included in the merge candidate list; derive motion information on the current block based on the selected candidate; generate LO prediction samples and Li prediction samples of the current block based on the motion information; and generate prediction samples of the current block based on the LO prediction samples, the LI prediction samples, and weight information, wherein the weight information is weight information for a bi-prediction and is derived based on a weight index for the selected candidate, wherein the constructed affine candidate includes control point motion vectors (CPMVs), and wherein based on a case that the constructed affine candidate is generated based on {CPO, CP1, CP3}, a weight index for the constructed affine candidate is derived based on a weight index for the CPO, wherein the CPO is related to a top-left corner of the current block, the CP 1 is related to a top-right corner of the current block and the CP3 is related to a bottom- right corner of the current block. Claim 2,3 Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claims 1-3 are generic to all that is recited in claims of co-pending applications. That is, claims 1-3 is/are anticipated by claims of co-pending applications. Claims 1-3 inprovisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims of copending Applications. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3 is/are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting. However, these claims would be allowable if its rejection are overcome. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications form the examiner should be directed to Nam Pham, whose can be contacted by phone at (571)270-7352. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon—Thurs. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, CZEKAJ DAVID, can be reached on (571)272-7327. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) AT 866-217-9197 (too free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NAM D PHAM/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2487
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 02, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12701228
PICTURE PARTITIONING-BASED CODING METHOD AND DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701229
BLOCK PARTITIONING IMAGE AND VIDEO DATA
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701265
METHOD FOR ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE SIGNAL, AND DEVICE THEREFOR
1y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12689727
METHODS AND APPARATUS OF VIDEO CODING IN 4:4:4 COLOR FORMAT
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12689767
METHOD FOR ENCODING/DECODING IMAGE SIGNAL, AND DEVICE THEREFOR
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+1.4%)
1y 11m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 554 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month