Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/259,464

IMAGE SENSOR

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jul 03, 2025
Priority
Sep 29, 2017 — JP 2017-192167 +4 more
Examiner
CUTLER, ALBERT H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
NIKON Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
833 granted / 1049 resolved
+19.4% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1076
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
50.3%
+10.3% vs TC avg
§102
28.5%
-11.5% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1049 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION This office action is responsive to application 19/259,464 filed on July 3, 2025. Claim 1 is pending in the application and have been examined by the Examiner. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. 18/387,150, filed on December 27, 2023. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim 1 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,425,752. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Prior Art Consider claim 1, the closest prior art, Kobayashi et al. (US 10,498,979) teaches: An image sensor (figure 1) comprising: a photoelectric converter (photoelectric conversion unit, 1) that photoelectrically converts light to generate an electric charge (see column 4, lines 26-28); a first readout circuit (second transfer transistor, M1B, fourth transfer transistor, M2B) that reads out a signal based on the charge converted by the photoelectric converter (i.e. via control signals TX1B and TX2B, figures 1 and 5, column 9, lines 48-54, column 9, line 65 through column 10, line 27); a second readout circuit (first transfer transistor, M1A, third transfer transistor, M2A) that reads out the signal (1, i.e. via control signals TX1A and TX2A, figures 1 and 5, column 9, lines 48-54, column 9, line 65 through column 10, line 27) and includes a holder (first holding unit, 2A) that holds the charge generated by the photoelectric converter (1, see figure 2, column 4, lines 34-36); and a controller (vertical scanning circuit, 101, column 9, lines 35-37) that performs either a first control for reading out the signal using the first readout circuit (M1B, M2B, i.e. via TX1B and TX2B, figure 5) or a second control for reading out the signal using the second readout circuit (M1A, M2A, i.e. via TX1A and TX2A, figure 5), wherein when the controller (101) performs the second control to read out the signal (i.e. via TX1A and TX2A in figure 5), the controller (101) performs control so that the charge is transferred from the photoelectric converter (1) to the holder (2A, i.e. via TX1A) during a period in which charge is accumulated in the photoelectric converter (i.e. during the “(n)th FRAME” period in figure 5, column 9, line 65 through column 10, line 2). However, the prior art of record does not teach nor reasonably suggest at least that when the controller performs the second control to read out the signal, the controller performs control so that the charge is caused to be discharged from the photoelectric converter using the first readout circuit, in combination with the other elements recited in claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALBERT H CUTLER whose telephone number is (571)270-1460. The examiner can normally be reached approximately Mon - Fri 8:00-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sinh Tran can be reached at (571)272-7564. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALBERT H CUTLER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751098
IMAGE SENSING DEVICE FOR CORRECTING DEPTH INFORMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745013
PHOTOELECTRIC CONVERSION APPARATUS
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12732721
VERTICALLY STACKED TYPE IMAGE SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12732716
SOLID-STATE IMAGING ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12720215
IMAGING APPARATUS, OPERATION METHOD OF IMAGING APPARATUS, PROGRAM, AND IMAGING SYSTEM
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.1%)
2y 7m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1049 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month