Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/259,817

STEERING ASSEMBLY FOR VEHICLES

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jul 03, 2025
Priority
Jul 04, 2024 — provisional 63/667,744
Examiner
FREEDMAN, LAURA
Art Unit
3614
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
BOMBARDIER INC.
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1046 granted / 1201 resolved
+35.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+1.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1218
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
42.4%
+2.4% vs TC avg
§102
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§112
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1201 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to the amendment filed 16 April 2026, in which claims 1, 3-6, 13, 16, and 18 were amended, claims 2, 14, 15, and 20 were canceled, and claims 21-24 were added. Drawings The replacement drawings received on 16 April 2026 are acceptable. Claim Objections Claims 22 and 23 are objected to because of the following informalities. Examiner suggests the changes below: “wherein adjustment assembly” be changed to --wherein the adjustment assembly-- (claim 22, line 1), since this feature has already been claimed in preceding claim 1; “adjusting a position of the steering input device” be changed to --adjusting the position of the steering input device-- (claim 23, line 2), since this feature has already been claimed in line 1. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 23 and 24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Isaka et al. (US 8899129 B2). In regards to claim 23, Isaka et al. discloses a method for adjusting a position of a steering input device (steering wheel #12) of a vehicle (#1; figures 1, 2) comprising: adjusting a position of the steering input device (#12) between multiple driving positions using an adjustment assembly (including tilt angle adjusting mechanism #33 and/or tilt-up mechanism #25) by pivoting the steering input device about a laterally extending pivot axis (axis extending through support shafts #31, 32; figures 2-9; column 7, lines 32-42, 60-65; column 9, lines 21-33; column 10, line 26-column 18); uncoupling the steering input device (#12) from the adjustment assembly (#25 and/or #33; uncoupled via movement of tilt lever #35 and/or pedal #44; figures 3, 6, 7, 10; column 10, line 51-column 11, line 53; columns 13-18); with the steering input device (#12) uncoupled from the adjustment assembly (#25 and/or #33), pivoting the steering input device up and away from the adjustment assembly to an ingress-egress position (tilt-up position; column 9, line 34-column 18; figures 2-7, 10). In regards to claim 24, Isaka et al. discloses a steering assembly (steering device #11) for steering a vehicle (#1; figures 1, 2), the steering assembly comprising: a steering input device (steering wheel #12) configured to steer the vehicle (#1; column 7) and to pivotably connect to a frame (vehicle body #2) of the vehicle (figure 1; column 6, line 32-column 7, line 12) to pivot about a laterally extending pivot axis (axis extending through support shafts #31, 32; figures 2-7; column 7, lines 32-42, 60-65; column 10, lines 26-39; column 11, lines 22-35; column 13, lines 24-54; column 14, lines 47-36; column 15, line 63-column 16, line 25); an adjustment assembly (including tilt angle adjusting mechanism #33) configured to select a driving position of the steering input device (#12) from a plurality of driving positions (figures 2-9; column 9, lines 21-33; column 10, line 51-column 18); a coupling assembly (including tilt-up mechanism #25) having: a coupled configuration (drive position), in which, upon actuation of the adjustment assembly (#33), the steering input device (#12) is moveable about the pivot axis (axis extending through support shafts #31, 32) between the plurality of driving positions (column 9, line 34-column 18; figures 2-7, 10); an uncoupled configuration (tilt-up position), in which, without actuation of the adjustment assembly (#33), the steering input device (#12) is moveable relative to the frame (#2) of the vehicle (#1) and the adjustment assembly about the pivot axis (axis extending through support shafts #31, 32) to an ingress-egress position (column 9, line 34-column 18; figures 2-7, 10). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3-13, 16-19, 21, and 22 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 16 April 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In regards to page 12, Applicant argues that none of the cited prior art discloses or suggests a method comprising uncoupling the steering input device from the adjustment assembly. As set forth above, Isaka et al. (US 8899129 B2) discloses uncoupling the steering input device (#12) from the adjustment assembly (including tilt angle adjusting mechanism #33 and/or tilt-up mechanism #25; uncoupled via movement of tilt lever #35 and/or pedal #44; figures 3, 6, 7, 10; column 10, line 51-column 11, line 53; columns 13-18). In regards to page 12, Applicant argues that none of the cited prior art discloses or suggests a steering column assembly comprising a coupling assembly having an uncoupled configuration with the steering input device movable relative to the adjustment assembly. As set forth above, Isaka et al. (US 8899129 B2) discloses a steering assembly (steering device #11) comprising an uncoupled configuration (tilt-up position), in which, without actuation of the adjustment assembly (#33), the steering input device (#12) is moveable relative to the frame (#2) of the vehicle (#1) and the adjustment assembly about the pivot axis (axis extending through support shafts #31, 32) to an ingress-egress position (column 9, line 34-column 18; figures 2-7, 10). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LAURA FREEDMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-2442. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason Shanske can be reached at 571-270-5985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LAURA FREEDMAN/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3614
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 16, 2026
Response Filed
May 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12630109
CHAMBER ADJUSTABLE STIFFNESS AIRBAG
3y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623629
AUTOMATIC VEHICLE BRAKING IN RESPONSE TO OPERATOR EGRESS
1y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12623711
ENERGY ABSORPTION STRAP INTEGRATED WITH A TELESCOPE DRIVE BRACKET
1y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617462
ROD ASSEMBLY
2y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12617366
HORIZONTALLY INFLATING PASSENGER FRONT AIR BAG SYSTEM
1y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+1.3%)
1y 11m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1201 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month