Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/260,658

INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jul 07, 2025
Priority
Jul 31, 2018 — JP PCT/JP2018/028764 +5 more
Examiner
RUDOLPH, VINCENT M
Art Unit
2664
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
NEC Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
46%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 7m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 46% of resolved cases
46%
Career Allowance Rate
127 granted / 275 resolved
-15.8% vs TC avg
Strong +41% interview lift
Without
With
+41.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 7m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
316
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
84.0%
+44.0% vs TC avg
§102
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 275 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Amendment received in response to the Non-Final Rejection mailed 12/12/2025 has been received and made of record. Claims 1-2. 4-9. 11-16, and 18-21 remain pending. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments regarding the Double Patenting Rejection have been considered and is withdrawn per the Terminal Disclaimer filed. Applicant’s additional arguments have been considered and are moot given the amendment raises 112 issues as fully disclosed. Please see the updated rejection in light of the amendments as detailed below. As such, the action is made FINAL. Claim Objections Claims 7, 14, and 21 are objected to because of the following informalities: Regarding claims 7, 14, and 21, each discloses “a last known position of each user”, but given the amendment, it should be changed to, “a last known position of the each user”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-2, 4-9, 11-16, and 18-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding independent claim 1, the claim discloses the following: Lines 4-5 discloses “at least one stage, among a plurality of stages” but later in lines 15-16 “a first stage of the plurality of stages” is disclosed, but it is unclear if that “first stage” is the same as the “at least one stage” as disclosed in line 4, “a corresponding stage” as disclosed in lines 6-7, or even “which stage” as disclosed in line 11. Lines 7-8 discloses “a plurality of second facial images”, but further in line 14 discloses “the second facial image”, thus it is unclear if the second facial image is one image or many as claimed. Regarding claims 8 and 15, the rationale provided in the rejection of claim 1 is incorporated herein, and rejected for the same reasons disclosed above. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Vincent Rudolph whose telephone number is (571)272-8243. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30 AM - 3:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VINCENT RUDOLPH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2671
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 07, 2025
Application Filed
Dec 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 12, 2026
Response Filed
May 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12675966
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR IMAGE ANALYSIS
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12664802
METHOD OF PROCESSING IMAGE OBTAINED FROM IMAGING DEVICE INTERLOCKED WITH COMPUTING APPARATUS AND SYSTEM USING THE SAME
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12651370
Interface for Digitization and Detection of Rip Currents Within Optical Imagery by Way of a Fuzzy Set
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12639796
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, RADIATION IMAGING SYSTEM, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM
3y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633019
SYSTEM OF GENERATING DATA FROM DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED IMAGES FOR PRE-PROCESSING AND METHOD THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
46%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+41.2%)
4y 7m (~3y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 275 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month