Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 19/265,931

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ADAPTING LINK OF V2X COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Jul 10, 2025
Priority
Jul 19, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0094161 +2 more
Examiner
ELMEJJARMI, ABDELILLAH
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Uif (university Industry Foundation), Yonsei University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
331 granted / 407 resolved
+21.3% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
438
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
53.6%
+13.6% vs TC avg
§102
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 407 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-8 are pending. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDSs) submitted are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper time wise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. Examiner requests Applicant submit an eTerminal Disclaimer in lieu of filing a traditional terminal disclaimer form. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claim 1-8 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-4 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12382532. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the subject matter claimed in the instant application is fully disclosed and covered by the U.S. Patent No. 12382532. Regarding claim 1, US12382532 discloses a link adapting method of a V2X communication system performed by a link adapting device which performs link adaptation based on information received from another link adapting device which is a communication target, the method comprising: receiving device state information from another link adapting device; and performing link adaptation with the other link adapting device based on the device state information, wherein the link adaptation is performed by: acquiring device movement speed information based on the device state information, acquiring a weight value using the device movement speed information based on a predetermined maximum speed, acquiring an offset value using the weight value, acquiring a state value using the offset value, and performing the link adaptation based on the state value (Claim 1). Regarding claim 2, US12382532 discloses wherein the link adapting method is performed by a processor mounted in a first vehicle, the other link adapting device is a second vehicle or a roadside base station terminal which is located in the vicinity of the first vehicle, the device state information includes relative movement information according to relation motion between the first vehicle and the second vehicle or the load side base station terminal, and the link adaptation is performed to determine a step size to adjust a level of a modulation and coding scheme (MCS) for link adaptation using the relative movement information (Claim 2). Regarding claim 3, US12382532 discloses wherein in the performing of link adaptation, the link adaptation is performed by adjusting a modulation and coding scheme (MCS) level based on the state value(Claim 1). Regarding claim 4, US12382532 discloses wherein in the performing of link adaptation, the link adaptation is performed by acquiring the MCS level which satisfies a predetermined target block error rate (BLER) from the state value (Claim 1). Regarding claim 5, US12382532 discloses wherein the device state information comprises a first state information for checking state change of a wireless channel and a second state information for checking a movement speed of a device, and in the performing of link adaptation, the state value is acquired based on the first state information and the second state information (Claim 1). Regarding claim 6, US12382532 discloses wherein in the performing of link adaptation, the state value is acquired by adding the offset value to an estimation value acquired based on the first state information (Claim 1). Regarding claim 7, US12382532 discloses wherein in the performing of link adaptation, the weight value is acquired based on the second state information (Claim 1). Regarding claim 8, US12382532 discloses a link adapting device which performs link adaptation based on information received from another link adapting device which is a communication target, the link adapting device comprising: a RF transceiver which transmits/receives a RF signal; a memory which stores one or more programs to perform the link adaptation; and one or more processors which perform an operation for the link adaptation according to one or more programs stored in the memory, wherein the processor receives device state information from another link adapting device by means of the RF transceiver and performs link adaptation with the other link adapting device based on the device state information, wherein the link adaptation is performed by: acquiring device movement speed information based on the device state information, acquiring a weight value using the device movement speed information based on a predetermined maximum speed, acquiring an offset value using the weight value, acquiring a state value using the offset value, and performing the link adaptation based on the state value(Claim 4). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ABDELILLAH ELMEJJARMI whose telephone number is (571)270-1656. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri: 8AM-5PM EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yemane Mesfin can be reached on (571)272-3927. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Respectfully submitted, /ABDELILLAH ELMEJJARMI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2462
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 10, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12756441
Methods and Apparatus for Using a Master Device to Mitigate and/or Avoid Interference in Uncoordinated Networks
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756426
WIRELESS SECURE COMMUNICATION METHOD USING RECONFIGURABLE INTELLIGENT SURFACE-NON-ORTHOGONAL MULTIPLE ACCESS UNDER COMPLEX CHANNEL CONDITIONS
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12739895
METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR SESSION ESTABLISHMENT, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738996
CHANNEL INFORMATION OBTAINING METHOD AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732999
COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, BASE STATION, AND COMMUNICATION METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.6%)
2y 8m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 407 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month