Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 19/267,055

METHOD FOR POSITIONING, TERMINAL DEVICE, AND NETWORK DEVICE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 11, 2025
Priority
Apr 07, 2023 — continuation of PCTCN2023087102
Examiner
OBAYANJU, OMONIYI
Art Unit
2645
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Quectel Wireless Solutions Co., Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
447 granted / 623 resolved
+9.7% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
656
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
§103
58.0%
+18.0% vs TC avg
§102
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 623 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 3-5, 7-11, 13, 15-18, 20, and 22-24, have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3-5, 7, 8, 11, 13, 15-18, 20, 23, and 24, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Berggren et al. (US Publication No. 20220201646) in view of Cirik et al. (US Publication No. 20200100154). As to claims 1 and 13, Berggren teaches a method and an apparatus, comprising: at least one processor; and one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media coupled to the at least one processor and storing programming instructions for execution by the at least one processor, wherein the programming instructions, when executed, cause the apparatus to perform operations comprising (fig. 2, fig. 3, and pp0085): determining a first beam for transmitting uplink reference signals based on a signal measurement result of a first signal, wherein the uplink reference signals are configured to position a terminal device (fig. 8, pp0007, pp0099, the UE may utilize uplink resources to transmit uplink reference signals to a set of network nodes participating in positioning (e.g. a serving base station and/or one or more neighboring base stations) while in idle mode, uplink-based measurements, downlink-based measurements, or both may be utilized to compute a position of the UE), wherein the first signal comprises a downlink signal from a first cell of a plurality of cells (fig. 5, fig. 8, #186, downlink reference signals), wherein the first cell comprises at least one of a serving cell or a neighboring cell (fig. 8, #186, downlink reference signals), and wherein the determining the first beam for transmitting the uplink reference signals comprises: determining the first beam for transmitting the uplink reference signals to the first cell based on first information (fig. 8, pp0103, a corresponding transmit beam may be selected based on the identified receive beam. Beam correspondence refers to a situation where UE 100 may derive an uplink (e.g. transmit) beam based on a downlink beam (and vice versa). For example, if UE 100 receives a downlink signal on beam index 1 (e.g. best received beam is beam index 1), the uplink beam (e.g. transmit beam) may also use beam index 1) and a signal measurement result of the downlink signal from the first cell (fig. 8, fig. 12, pp0132, transmits uplink reference signals to the one or more network nodes participating in positioning. The wireless communications device transmit the uplink reference signals using transmit beams determined via the downlink measurements and/or using uplink resources indicated in the positioning configuration information), wherein the first information indicates a correspondence relationship between a downlink signal index of the first cell and transmission beams of the terminal device (fig. 8, fig. 5, pp0103, a corresponding transmit beam may be selected based on the identified receive beam. Beam correspondence refers to a situation where UE 100 may derive an uplink (e.g. transmit) beam based on a downlink beam (and vice versa). For example, if UE 100 receives a downlink signal on beam index 1 (e.g. best received beam is beam index 1), the uplink beam (e.g. transmit beam) may also use beam index 1). However, Berggren fails to explicitly teach that wherein the plurality of cells have a same correspondence relationship between a downlink signal index and transmission beams of the terminal device. In an analogous field of endeavor, Cirik teaches the concept of wherein the plurality of cells have a same correspondence relationship between a downlink signal index (i.e. configuration parameters) and transmission beams of the terminal device (pp0300, pp0325, plurality of cells may share serving beams. The same serving beams may be used, for example, for a downlink reception (e.g., PDCCH reception, PDSCH reception) and/or for an uplink transmission (e.g., PUSCH transmission, PUCCH transmission), the wireless device may use the first serving beam for sending (e.g., transmitting) via an uplink control channel (e.g., a PUCCH) in each cell of the plurality of cells, for example, based on the one or more configuration parameters received from the base station and pp0423, one or more configuration parameters may comprise a cell group parameter indicating a plurality of serving cell-specific indexes of the plurality of cells). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Berggren with the teachings of Cirik to achieve the goal of efficiently and reliably providing beam configuration to reduce signaling overhead and reducing battery consumption in a communication system (Cirik, pp0004). As to claims 3 and 15, Berggren in view of Cirik teaches the limitations of the independent claims as discussed above. Berggren further teaches wherein the downlink signal index of the first cell comprises a portion of indexes of downlink signals that the first cell supports; or the downlink signal index of the first cell comprises the indexes of the downlink signals that the first cell supports (fig. 5, fig. 8, pp0103, a corresponding transmit beam may be selected based on the identified receive beam. Beam correspondence refers to a situation where UE 100 may derive an uplink (e.g. transmit) beam based on a downlink beam (and vice versa). For example, if UE 100 receives a downlink signal on beam index 1 (e.g. best received beam is beam index 1), the uplink beam (e.g. transmit beam) may also use beam index 1, and pp0113). As to claims 4 and 16, Berggren in view of Cirik teaches the limitations of the independent claims as discussed above. Berggren further teaches wherein the portion of the indexes of the downlink signals is determined based on a cell where the terminal device is located (fig. 5, fig. 8, pp0103, a corresponding transmit beam may be selected based on the identified receive beam. Beam correspondence refers to a situation where UE 100 may derive an uplink (e.g. transmit) beam based on a downlink beam (and vice versa). For example, if UE 100 receives a downlink signal on beam index 1 (e.g. best received beam is beam index 1), the uplink beam (e.g. transmit beam) may also use beam index 1, and pp0113). As to claims 5 and 17, Berggren in view of Cirik teaches the limitations of the independent claims as discussed above. Berggren further teaches wherein the first information is transmitted to the terminal device by at least one of a positioning server or a base station (fig. 5, fig. 8, pp0103, a corresponding transmit beam may be selected based on the identified receive beam. Beam correspondence refers to a situation where UE 100 may derive an uplink (e.g. transmit) beam based on a downlink beam (and vice versa). For example, if UE 100 receives a downlink signal on beam index 1 (e.g. best received beam is beam index 1), the uplink beam (e.g. transmit beam) may also use beam index 1, and pp0113). As to claim 7, Berggren in view of Cirik teaches the limitations of the independent claims as discussed above. Berggren further teaches further comprising: in response to a target cell not belonging to the plurality of cells (fig. 5, fig. 8, neighbor base stations), receiving, by the terminal device, a paging message sent by a network device, wherein the network device comprises at least one of a network element of core network or a base station corresponding to the target cell (fig. 5, fig. 6, #154 activation signal to trigger transmission of uplink reference signal, and pp0115); and establishing, by the terminal device, a connection with the target cell based on the paging message (fig. 5, fig. 6, #154 activation signal to trigger transmission of uplink reference signal, and pp0115). As to claims 8 and 20, Berggren in view of Cirik teaches the limitations of the independent claims as discussed above. Berggren further teaches wherein the target cell is determined based on a location of the terminal device (fig. 5, fig. 8, pp0096, each network node may have a specific configuration for UEs served by the network node or located within a cell of the network node), and the location of the terminal device is determined based on a signal measurement result of the uplink reference signals measured by a plurality of cells (fig. 8, fig. 12, pp0132, transmits uplink reference signals to the one or more network nodes participating in positioning. The wireless communications device transmit the uplink reference signals using transmit beams determined via the downlink measurements and/or using uplink resources indicated in the positioning configuration information). As to claims 11 and 23, Berggren in view of Cirik teaches the limitations of the independent claims as discussed above. Berggren further teaches wherein the downlink signal comprises SSB, or the uplink reference signals comprise sounding reference signal (SRS) (fig. 5, fig. 8, and pp0098, the uplink reference signal may be an uplink positioning reference signal (UL-PRS), a sounding reference signal (SRS), and pp0104). As to claim 18, Berggren in view of Cirik teaches the limitations of the independent claims as discussed above. Berggren further teaches the operations further comprising: in response to a target cell to which the terminal device belongs not belonging to the first cell, establishing a connection with the target cell (fig. 5, fig. 8, neighbor base stations, and pp0102, it is possible that the UE 100 has moved to a different serving cell or moved to a different group of cells having a different configuration for idle mode positioning); and receiving second information from the target cell (fig. 5, fig. 8, pp0113, a corresponding transmit beam may be selected based on a receive beam for reference signals from the serving base station 132 and/or neighbor base stations 134 and pp0103), wherein the second information indicates a correspondence relationship between a downlink signal index of the target cell and the transmission beams of the terminal device (fig. 5, fig. 8, pp0103, a corresponding transmit beam may be selected based on the identified receive beam. Beam correspondence refers to a situation where UE 100 may derive an uplink (e.g. transmit) beam based on a downlink beam (and vice versa). For example, if UE 100 receives a downlink signal on beam index 1 (e.g. best received beam is beam index 1), the uplink beam (e.g. transmit beam) may also use beam index 1, and pp0113). As to claim 24, Berggren teaches one or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing computer instructions, that when executed by one or more processors, cause a computing device to perform operations comprising (fig. 2, fig. 3, and pp0085): determining a first beam for transmitting uplink reference signals based on a signal measurement result of a first signal, wherein the uplink reference signals are configured to position a terminal device (fig. 8, pp0007, pp0099, the UE may utilize uplink resources to transmit uplink reference signals to a set of network nodes participating in positioning (e.g. a serving base station and/or one or more neighboring base stations) while in idle mode, uplink-based measurements, downlink-based measurements, or both may be utilized to compute a position of the UE), wherein the first signal comprises a downlink signal from a first cell of a plurality of cells (fig. 5, fig. 8, #186, downlink reference signals), wherein the first cell comprises at least one of a serving cell or a neighboring cell (fig. 8, #186, downlink reference signals), and wherein the determining the first beam for transmitting the uplink reference signals comprises: determining the first beam for transmitting the uplink reference signals to the first cell based on first information (fig. 8, pp0103, a corresponding transmit beam may be selected based on the identified receive beam. Beam correspondence refers to a situation where UE 100 may derive an uplink (e.g. transmit) beam based on a downlink beam (and vice versa). For example, if UE 100 receives a downlink signal on beam index 1 (e.g. best received beam is beam index 1), the uplink beam (e.g. transmit beam) may also use beam index 1) and a signal measurement result of the downlink signal from the first cell (fig. 8, fig. 12, pp0132, transmits uplink reference signals to the one or more network nodes participating in positioning. The wireless communications device transmit the uplink reference signals using transmit beams determined via the downlink measurements and/or using uplink resources indicated in the positioning configuration information), wherein the first information indicates a correspondence relationship between a downlink signal index of the first cell and transmission beams of the terminal device (fig. 8, fig. 5, pp0103, a corresponding transmit beam may be selected based on the identified receive beam. Beam correspondence refers to a situation where UE 100 may derive an uplink (e.g. transmit) beam based on a downlink beam (and vice versa). For example, if UE 100 receives a downlink signal on beam index 1 (e.g. best received beam is beam index 1), the uplink beam (e.g. transmit beam) may also use beam index 1); in response to determining that a target cell does not belong to the first cell (fig. 5, fig. 8, neighbor base stations, and pp0113, UE 100 has moved to a different serving cell or moved to a different group of cells having a different configuration for idle mode positioning), establishing, by the terminal device, a connection with the target cell (fig. 8, connection to neighbor base stations) for receiving second information that indicates a correspondence relationship between a downlink signal index of the target cell and the transmission beams of the terminal device (fig. 5, fig. 8, pp0103, a corresponding transmit beam may be selected based on the identified receive beam. Beam correspondence refers to a situation where UE 100 may derive an uplink (e.g. transmit) beam based on a downlink beam (and vice versa). For example, if UE 100 receives a downlink signal on beam index 1 (e.g. best received beam is beam index 1), the uplink beam (e.g. transmit beam) may also use beam index 1, pp0113, a corresponding transmit beam may be selected based on a receive beam for reference signals from the serving base station 132 and/or neighbor base stations 134); and receiving by the terminal device and by using the established connection with the target cell, the second information from the target cell, wherein the second information indicates the correspondence relationship between the downlink signal index of the target cell and the transmission beams of the terminal device (fig. 5, fig. 8, pp0103, a corresponding transmit beam may be selected based on the identified receive beam. Beam correspondence refers to a situation where UE 100 may derive an uplink (e.g. transmit) beam based on a downlink beam (and vice versa). For example, if UE 100 receives a downlink signal on beam index 1 (e.g. best received beam is beam index 1), the uplink beam (e.g. transmit beam) may also use beam index 1, and pp0113, a corresponding transmit beam may be selected based on a receive beam for reference signals from the serving base station 132 and/or neighbor base stations 134). However, Berggren fails to explicitly teach that wherein the plurality of cells have a same correspondence relationship between a downlink signal index and transmission beams of the terminal device. In an analogous field of endeavor, Cirik teaches the concept of wherein the plurality of cells have a same correspondence relationship between a downlink signal index (i.e. configuration parameters) and transmission beams of the terminal device (pp0300, pp0325, plurality of cells may share serving beams. The same serving beams may be used, for example, for a downlink reception (e.g., PDCCH reception, PDSCH reception) and/or for an uplink transmission (e.g., PUSCH transmission, PUCCH transmission), the wireless device may use the first serving beam for sending (e.g., transmitting) via an uplink control channel (e.g., a PUCCH) in each cell of the plurality of cells, for example, based on the one or more configuration parameters received from the base station and pp0423, one or more configuration parameters may comprise a cell group parameter indicating a plurality of serving cell-specific indexes of the plurality of cells). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Berggren with the teachings of Cirik to achieve the goal of efficiently and reliably providing beam configuration to reduce signaling overhead and reducing battery consumption in a communication system (Cirik, pp0004). Claim(s) 10 and 22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Berggren et al. (US Publication No. 20220201646) in view of Cirik et al. (US Publication No. 20200100154) and further in view of Keating et al. (US Publication No. 20210356581). As to claims 10 and 22, Berggren in view of Cirik teaches the limitations of the independent claims as discussed above. Berggren further teaches wherein the first beam comprises beams respectively corresponding to a plurality of cells comprising a second cell and a third cell (fig. 5, 101a-c to 111a-c, corresponding beam between multiple base stations, and fig. 8), and determining, by the terminal device, the first beam for transmitting the uplink reference signals based on the signal measurement result of the first signal, comprises: determining, by the terminal device, a second beam corresponding to the second cell based on a signal measurement result of a downlink signal from the second cell; determining, by the terminal device, a third beam corresponding to the third cell based on a signal measurement result of a downlink signal from the third cell; and determining, by the terminal device, the first beam based on the second beam and the third beam (fig. 5, fig. 8, pp0103, a corresponding transmit beam may be selected based on the identified receive beam. Beam correspondence refers to a situation where UE 100 may derive an uplink (e.g. transmit) beam based on a downlink beam (and vice versa). For example, if UE 100 receives a downlink signal on beam index 1 (e.g. best received beam is beam index 1), the uplink beam (e.g. transmit beam) may also use beam index 1, and pp0113). However, fails to explicitly teach wherein the first beam comprises beams shared by the second beam and the third beam. In an analogous field of endeavor, Keating teaches the concept wherein the first beam comprises beams shared by the second beam and the third beam (fig. 2, fig. 3, pp0145, UE 110-1 may also scan the different UE antenna panels to identify if a shared TX beam is possible to be used for multiple target cells. This can be done using UE DL AoA calculations from the visible gNBs). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Berggren and Cirik with the teachings of Keating to achieve the goal of efficiently providing positioning which promises high accuracy due to lack of synchronization errors suffered and the wide bandwidth available (better timing measurement accuracy) in a communication system (Keating, pp0131 and pp0132). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 9 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OMONIYI OBAYANJU whose telephone number is (571)270-5885. The examiner can normally be reached M-Thur 10:30-7pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ANTHONY S ADDY can be reached at (571) 272-7795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OMONIYI OBAYANJU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Dec 17, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 03, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 16, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 06, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772302
NETWORK SLICE UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT IN WIRELESS NETWORKS
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772297
METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM OF PRACH TRANSMISSION WITH REPETITION, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12757161
SERVICE-BASED PAGING TECHNIQUES
4y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12757001
METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING MESSAGE BY V2X UE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND DEVICE THEREFOR
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12739944
Installation of Wi-Fi access points with cellular connection
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+24.7%)
3y 0m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 623 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month