Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 19/269,690

TORQUE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM FOR A SLIP RING UNIT OF A WIND TURBINE AND METHOD OF ASSEMBLY OF A SLIP RING UNIT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 15, 2025
Priority
Jul 16, 2024 — EU 24382772.2
Examiner
LAMBERT, WAYNE A
Art Unit
3745
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
GE Vernova Renovables España S L
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
319 granted / 514 resolved
-7.9% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
546
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
50.5%
+10.5% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 514 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims This is a non-final rejection in response to the communication filed 01/22/2026, claims 16-32 are currently pending. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Invention I (claims 16-27 and 31-32) in the reply filed on 01/07/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that “each of the independent claims 16, 28, and 31 recite a torque transmission system for a slip ring unit of a wind turbine that provides a degree of freedom in at least one of an axial direction or in a radial direction and also prevents relative displacement between the rotating part of the slip ring unit and the rotating component of the wind turbine in a tangential direction .... Thus, the claims are not patently distinct and an additional search or examination burden does not exist.” This is not found persuasive because Inventions I and II are related as product and process of use. Further, the inventions can be shown to be distinct if either or both of the following can be shown: (1) the process for using the product as claimed can be practiced with another materially different product or (2) the product as claimed can be used in a materially different process of using that product. See MPEP § 806.05(h). In the instant case the process for using the product as claimed can be practiced with another materially different product such as a slip ring crane system. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 28-30 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected Invention II, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 01/07/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 16-18 and 31 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CN 207559790 to Zhang (Zhang, and based on English Machine Translation). In Reference to Claim 16 Zhang discloses a torque transmission system for a slip ring unit (Fig. 3, system including 102 for instance) of a wind turbine (¶ [0005]), the slip ring unit configured for being mounted along a rotational axis of a wind turbine rotor (¶ [0005], [0041], the slip ring unit as mounted with and concentric with generator rotor for instance), the slip ring unit having an encoder (¶ [0005]), a rotating part configured for connection to a rotating component of the wind turbine (¶ [0005], 102 connected to the generator rotor 101 of the wind turbine for instance), and a static part configured for connection to a static component of the wind turbine (static part of the slip ring unit for instance, not shown), the torque transmission system (Fig. 3, 200 for instance) configured for connecting the rotating part of the slip ring unit (102 for instance) to the rotating component of the wind turbine (to the generator rotor of the wind turbine for instance) and having a degree of freedom in at least one of an axial direction or a radial direction (¶ [0042] and [0046], radially and axially by not generating forces for instance), and the torque transmission system (200 for instance) further configured to prevent relative displacement between the rotating part of the slip ring unit and the rotating component of the wind turbine in a tangential direction (by the configuration of the system 200 in maintaining the slip ring unit and the generator system concentric for instance, see ¶ [0041]). In Reference to Claim 17 Zhang discloses the torque transmission system of claim 16, wherein the torque transmission system (Fig. 3, 200 for instance) has a degree of freedom in the axial direction and also in the radial direction (¶ [0042] and [0046], radially and axially by not generating forces for instance). In Reference to Claim 18 Zhang discloses the torque transmission system of claim 16, wherein the torque transmission system (Fig. 3, 200 for instance) comprises a transmission arm (10 for instance) and a coupling element (30 for instance), and wherein a first end of the transmission arm (left end of 10 for instance) is configured for connection to the rotating component of the wind turbine (101 for instance), and wherein the coupling element is configured for connection between a second end of the transmission arm (right end of 10 for instance) and the rotating part of the slip ring unit (102 for instance). In Reference to Claim 31 Zhang discloses a wind turbine (¶ [0004]), comprising: a tower; a nacelle mounted atop the tower (¶ [0004]); a rotor comprising a rotatable hub and at least one rotor blade mounted to the rotatable hub (¶ [0004]); a slip ring unit( Fig. 3, system including 102 for instance) configured for being mounted along a rotational axis of the rotor (¶ [0005], [0041], the slip ring unit as mounted with and concentric with generator rotor for instance), the slip ring comprising an encoder (¶ [0005]), a rotating part configured for connection to a rotating component of the wind turbine (¶ [0005], 102 connected to the generator rotor 101 of the wind turbine for instance), and a static part configured for connection to a static component of the wind turbine (static part of the slip ring unit for instance, not shown), a torque transmission system (Fig. 3, 200 for instance) configured for connecting the rotating part of the slip ring unit (102 for instance) to the rotating component of the wind turbine (to the generator rotor of the wind turbine for instance) and having a degree of freedom in at least one of an axial direction or a radial direction (¶ [0042] and [0046], radially and axially by not generating forces for instance), and wherein the torque transmission system is further configured to prevent relative displacement between the rotating part of the slip ring unit and the rotating component of the wind turbine in a tangential direction (by the configuration of the system 200 in maintaining the slip ring unit and the generator system concentric for instance, see ¶ [0041]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 21 and 32 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN 207559790 to Zhang (Zhang, and based on English Machine Translation) in view of CN 205260233 to Lei (Lei, and based on English Machine Translation). In Reference to Claim 21 Zhang discloses the torque transmission system of claim 18, except, "... wherein the coupling element comprises a Clevis coupling for connection to the rotating part of the slip ring unit, the Clevis coupling exhibiting a degree of freedom in the axial direction ....” Lei is related to a system for a slip ring unit (Fig. 1, 3 and 4 for instance) of a wind turbine (¶ [0002]), as the claimed invention, and teaches wherein a coupling element (Fig. 4, 2, 621, 42 and 41 for instance) comprises a Clevis coupling (62, 621 and 42 for instance) for connection to a rotating part of the slip ring unit (4 for instance), the Clevis coupling exhibiting a degree of freedom in the axial direction (¶ [0028], in the thrust direction for instance). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide in the system of Zhang wherein the coupling element (of Zhang) comprises a Clevis coupling (as taught by Lei) for connection to the rotating part of the slip ring unit (of Zhang), the Clevis coupling exhibiting a degree of freedom in the axial direction (as taught by Lei), so as to use an art known technique (of using coupling configurations for a rotating part of a slip ring unit that counters certain forces experienced during operation as taught by Lei) into the system of Zhang and predictably counter certain forces experienced by the rotating part of the slip ring unit. In Reference to Claim 32 Zhang discloses the wind turbine of claim 31, wherein the rotating component of the wind turbine comprises the rotatable hub, a generator rotor, or a rotatable shaft (¶ [0004], [0005], a generator rotor or rotatable shaft for instance). Zhang does not teach “... the wind turbine is a direct drive wind turbine ....” Lei is related to a system for a slip ring unit (Fig. 1, 3 and 4 for instance) of a wind turbine (¶ [0002]), as the claimed invention, and teaches wherein the wind turbine is a direct drive wind turbine (¶ [0026]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide in the system of Zhang wherein the wind turbine is a direct drive wind turbine (as taught by Lei), so as to use an art known technique (of a direct drive wind turbine having a slip ring unit configuration as taught by Lei) into the system of Zhang and predictably provide a wind turbine system. Claim(s) 22-24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN 207559790 to Zhang (Zhang, and based on English Machine Translation) in view of CN 110645154 to Liu (Liu, and based on English Machine Translation). In Reference to Claim 22 Zhang discloses the torque transmission system of claim 18, wherein the coupling element (Fig. 3, 30 for instance) comprises a first universal joint (32 for instance) and a second universal joint (31 for instance) connected by an intermediate shaft (30 for instance, see ¶ [0036]), the first universal joint (32) configured for connection to the second end of the transmission arm (10 for instance), and the second universal joint (31) configured for connection to the rotating part of the slip ring unit (to 102 via 20 for instance). Zhang does not teach that the intermediate shaft is “... a sliding intermediate shaft ...” but does teach that the shaft includes an elastic portion 40. Liu is related to a system for a slip ring unit (Fig. 1, 5 for instance) of a wind turbine (¶ [0004]), as the claimed invention, and teaches a sliding intermediate shaft (Fig. 2, 4 for instance) connected to joints (42 for instance) of a transmission arm (2 for instance) and the slip ring unit (5 for instance, via 3). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide in the system of Zhang wherein the coupling element (of Zhang) comprises a first universal joint (of Zhang) and a second universal joint (Zhang) connected by a sliding intermediate shaft (as taught by Liu), so as to use an art known technique (of using portions of a coupling configuration for a rotating part of a slip ring unit that counters certain forces experienced during operation as taught by Liu) into the system of Zhang and predictably counter certain forces experienced by the rotating part of the slip ring unit. In Reference to Claim 23 Zhang, as modified by Liu, discloses the torque transmission system of claim 22, wherein the first universal joint and the second universal joint have a ninety degrees offset (Zhang Fig. 3, 32 and 31, 31 as disposed down and to the right of 32 for instance). In Reference to Claim 24 Zhang, as modified by Liu, discloses the torque transmission system of claim 22, wherein an angle of the first universal joint with respect to the intermediate shaft is substantially the same as an angle of the second universal joint with respect to the intermediate shaft (Zhang Fig. 3, 32 relative to 30 and 32 relative to 30 for instance). Claim(s) 25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN 207559790 to Zhang (Zhang, and based on English Machine Translation) in view of US Patent 2,762,211 to Bellomo (Bellomo). In Reference to Claim 25 Zhang discloses the torque transmission system of claim 18, wherein the coupling element (Fig. 3, 30 for instance) comprises a first joint (32 for instance) and a second joint (31 for instance) connected by an intermediate shaft (30 for instance), the first joint configured for connection to the second end of the transmission arm (10 for instance), and the second joint configured for connection to the rotating part of the slip ring unit (102 for instance, and via 20). Zhang does not teach the first and second joint being a “... homokinetic ...” joint. Bellomo is related to a universal joint connection (col 1, ll 15-22), as the claimed invention, and teaches wherein the joint is a homokinetic joint. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide in the system of Zhang wherein the first joint and second joint is a homokinetic joint (as taught by Bellomo), so a to use an art known technique (of using universal joints in a system that are homokinetic joints as taught by Bellomo) into the system of Zhang (as a replacement of the joints) and predictably form connection between the transmission arm and the slip ring unit. Claim(s) 26-27 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN 207559790 to Zhang (Zhang, and based on English Machine Translation) in view of US Patent 3,479,471 to Smith et al. (Smith). In Reference to Claim 26 Zhang discloses the torque transmission system of claim 18, except, "... wherein the coupling element comprises a first leg and a second leg, wherein a first end of the first leg is configured for fixed connection to the second end of the transmission arm and a first end of the second leg is configured for fixed connection to the rotating part of the slip ring unit, and wherein the second end of the first leg and the second end of the second leg is connected at a pivot point ....” Smith is related to coupling element (Fig. 1, 22 for instance) for connecting an electrode (24 for instance) to a system (20 for instance), as the claimed invention, and teaches wherein the coupling element comprises a first leg and a second leg (top and bottom leg of 22 for instance), wherein a first end of the first leg is configured for connection to a second end of the system (20 for instance) and a first end of the second leg is configured for connection to the electrode (24 for instance), and wherein the second end of the first leg and the second end of the second leg is connected at a pivot point (of 22 in center for instance). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide in the system of Zhang wherein the coupling element comprises a first leg and a second leg (as taught by Smith), wherein a first end of the first leg (as taught by Smith) is configured for fixed connection to the second end of the transmission arm (of Zhang) and a first end of the second leg (as taught by Smith) is configured for fixed connection to the rotating part of the slip ring unit (of Zhang), and wherein the second end of the first leg and the second end of the second leg is connected at a pivot point (as taught by Smith), so as to use an art known technique (of the connection of an electrode to a system using a pantograph connection as taught by Smith) into the system of Zhang and predictably connect the slip ring unit to the transmission arm. In Reference to Claim 27 Zhang, as modified by Smith, discloses the torque transmission system of claim 26, wherein the pivot point is configured to facilitate relative movement between the first end of the first leg and the first end of the second leg in the axial and in the radial directions while preventing relative movement in the tangential direction (the pantograph system 22 of Smith and only permitting movement direction up and down for instance). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 19 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The claim is deemed to be directed to an nonobvious improvement over the prior art. While the prior art teaches the torque transmission system, wherein the coupling element comprises a coupling plate (Zhang, Fig. 3, at end of 10 for instance) configured for connection to the second end of the transmission arm (10 for instance), the prior art, alone or in combination, does not teach or make obvious the coupling plate being configured to slide in a radial direction with respect to the transmission arm. This so as to provide structural integrity in the system by absorption of axial and/or radial displacements. Claims 20 would be allowable based on its dependency on claim 19. Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure, as cited in the Notice of References Cited, are cited to show slip ring units using various types of connections, and slip ring units in wind turbines. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WAYNE A LAMBERT whose telephone number is (571)270-3516. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 9 am - 7 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathaniel E Wiehe can be reached at (571)272-8648. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WAYNE A LAMBERT/Examiner, Art Unit 3745 /NATHANIEL E WIEHE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 15, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 04, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12612926
FAN BLADE, FAN AND FAN LAMP
1y 0m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12607134
CASE COMPRISING INTERNAL AND/OR EXTERNAL STIFFENERS
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12565842
AIRFOIL HAVING A FILM HOLE
2y 8m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12553450
PLENUM CLOSURE PANEL WITH INTEGRATED AIRFLOW DIRECTION DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12540597
SPAR CAP WITH TAPERING AND SERRATED END SECTION
2y 2m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+23.5%)
3y 3m (~2y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 514 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month