Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/275,086

METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR LOCATING AND TRACKING OBJECTS

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jul 21, 2025
Priority
Jun 08, 2007 — continuation of 7848905 +7 more
Examiner
ISHIZUKA, YOSHIHISA
Art Unit
2857
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Troxler Electronic Laboratories, Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 4m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
302 granted / 439 resolved
+0.8% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
461
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§103
34.1%
-5.9% vs TC avg
§102
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§112
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 439 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Applicant’s amendments to the claims, filed 3/31/2026, are accepted and appreciated by the examiner. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed 3/31/2026 have been fully considered but they are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection as necessitated by Applicant’s amendments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 1 recites “a measuring device configured to detect a condition of cargo in a shipping container co-located with the measuring device and a communications module co-located with the cargo comprising a transceiver configured to wirelessly communicate directly over a long-range wireless network to a remote device” However the limitation a communications module co-located with the cargo comprising a transceiver configured to wirelessly communicate directly over a long-range wireless network to a remote device in view of the claim as a whole is viewed to be new matter. Various embodiments in the specification recite portions of the limitation, but this limitation with the rest of the claims is viewed as new matter. Claims that depend on the above rejected claims are also rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Breed (US 2005/0137786 A1) teaches an arrangement for transferring information between a vehicle and one or more transmitters separate from the vehicle includes an antenna mounted on the vehicle and capable of receiving radio frequency waves emitted by the transmitter and containing information, a position determining device for determining the position of the vehicle, and a processor coupled to the antenna and the position determining device and arranged to analyze the waves received by the antenna, determine whether any received waves contain information of interest for operation of the vehicle based on the vehicle's position as determined by the position determining device, and extract the information of interest only from the received waves determined to contain information of interest. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YOSHIHISA ISHIZUKA whose telephone number is (571)270-7050. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 11:00-7:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Catherine Rastovski can be reached at (571) 270-0349. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. YOSHIHISA . ISHIZUKA Examiner Art Unit 2857 /YOSHIHISA ISHIZUKA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2857
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 21, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 31, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748149
BATTERY CURRENT MONITORING METHOD, CONTROLLER AND CIRCUIT
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743484
SIGNAL ANALYSIS METHOD AND SYSTEM BASED ON MODEL FOR ACQUIRINGAND IDENTIFYING NOISE PANORAMIC DISTRIBUTION
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742831
Electrically Powered Vehicle and Method of Diagnosing Deterioration of Vehicle Battery
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12725046
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING ANOMALY DETECTION USING NEURAL NETWORK
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12693275
METHOD AND PROGRAM FOR ASSISTING DEVELOPMENT OF ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
4y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+19.5%)
3y 6m (~2y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 439 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month