Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/275,172

OCCUPANT PROTECTION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jul 21, 2025
Examiner
DHANANI, SHAMS
Art Unit
3614
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Toyoda Gosei Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allow Rate
105 granted / 112 resolved
+41.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
5 currently pending
Career history
117
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
51.1%
+11.1% vs TC avg
§102
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 112 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claim 1-8 provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1-7 of Patent 12391204. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. The pending claims are broader and are met by the patented claims as outlined below. This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection. Application 19275172 Patent 12391204 1. An occupant protection device, comprising: a seat having a seat portion and a backrest portion; an elongated restraining member for restraining an occupant in the seat, one end portion in a longitudinal direction of the restraining member being disposed on a left top end side of the backrest portion, another end portion of the restraining member being disposed on a right top end side of the backrest portion, the restraining member being caused to pass from the one end portion to the other end portion through a left side face of the backrest portion, a left side face of the seat portion, a front face of the seat portion, a right side face of the seat portion, and a right side face of the backrest portion, the restraining member being housed in the seat; Anda take-up unit that takes up at least one of the one end portion and the other end portion of the restraining member; a motor that operates to drive the take-up unit to take up the at least one of the one end portion and the other end portion; and a control device that controls the motor to operate, wherein the restraining member is fed out from a housing portion of the seat and pulled up toward an upper end side of the backrest portion in accompaniment to an operation of the take-up unit, forming an occupant supporting portion, which supports a back face side of left and right thigh portions of the occupant, and a pulling portion that extends from both left and right ends of the occupant supporting portion to the upper end side of the backrest portion, and restrains the occupant against the backrest portion. 2. The occupant protection device according to claim 1, wherein the restraining member includes a core member that has flexibility and is taken up by the take-up unit, and a tube member that has flexibility and covers the core member. 3. The occupant protection device according to claim 1, wherein the take-up unit can take up both the one end portion and the other end portion of the restraining member. 4. The occupant protection device according to claim 3, wherein the one end portion and the other end portion of the restraining member are disposed aligned left to right in a vicinity of a center of the backrest portion, and the restraining member is configured in such way as to be able to restrain a front face side of left and right shoulder portions of the occupant when the take-up unit operates. 5. The occupant protection device according to claim 1, wherein the restraining member is housed in a groove formed in the left side face of the backrest portion, the left side face of the seat portion, the front face of the seat portion, the right-side face of the seat portion, and the right-side face of the backrest portion. 6. The occupant protection device according to the occupant protection device according to wherein the control device is further configured to receive a signal from a sensor configured to sense that a collision is to occur before an actual collision, and responsive to the signal indicating that the collision is to occur, control the motor to operate to drive the take-up unit. 7. The occupant protection device according to claim 1 when the take-up unit operates to take up the at least one of the one end portion and the other end portion, the restraining member leaves the housing portion through the slit and the take-up unit rolls the restraining member up toward the upper end side of the backrest portion. 8. The occupant protection device according to claim 1, wherein take-up unit is further configured to stop the motor from operating when an end portion of the occupant supporting portion reaches a predetermined height dimension. 1. An occupant protection device, comprising: a seat having a seat portion and a backrest portion; an elongated restraining member for restraining an occupant in the seat, one end portion in a longitudinal direction of the restraining member being disposed on a left top end side of the backrest portion, another end portion of the restraining member being disposed on a right top end side of the backrest portion, the restraining member being caused to pass from the one end portion to the other end portion through a left side face of the backrest portion, a left side face of the seat portion, a front face of the seat portion, a right side face of the seat portion, and a right side face of the backrest portion, the restraining member being housed in the seat; and a take-up unit that takes up at least one of the one end portion and the other end portion of the restraining member; a motor that operates to drive the take-up unit to take up the at least one of the one end portion and the other end portion; and a control device that controls the motor to operate, wherein the restraining member is fed out from a housing portion of the seat and pulled up toward an upper end side of the backrest portion in accompaniment to an operation of the take-up unit, forming an occupant supporting portion, which supports a back face side of left and right thigh portions of the occupant, and a pulling portion that extends from both left and right ends of the occupant supporting portion to the upper end side of the backrest portion, and restrains the occupant against the backrest portion, wherein the restraining member includes a core member that has flexibility and is taken up by the take-up unit, and a tube member that has flexibility and covers the core member, wherein a part wound around the take-up unit is the core member that is exposed from the tube member, and wherein a slit is provided on a surface of the seat at a position where the restraining member is housed. 2 The occupant protection device according to claim 1, wherein the take-up unit can take up both the one end portion and the other end portion of the restraining member. 3. The occupant protection device according to claim 3, wherein the one end portion and the other end portion of the restraining member are disposed aligned left to right in a vicinity of a center of the backrest portion, and the restraining member is configured in such way as to be able to restrain a front face side of left and right shoulder portions of the occupant when the take- up unit operates. 4. The occupant protection device according to claim 1, wherein the restraining member is housed in a groove formed in the left side face of the backrest portion, the left side face of the seat portion, the front face of the seat portion, the right-side face of the seat portion, and the right-side face of the backrest portion. 5. The occupant protection device according to the occupant protection device according to wherein the control device is further configured to receive a signal from a sensor configured to sense that a collision is to occur before an actual collision, and responsive to the signal indicating that the collision is to occur, control the motor to operate to drive the take-up unit. 6. The occupant protection device according to the occupant protection device according to when the take-up unit operates to take up the at least one of the one end portion and the other end portion, the restraining member leaves the housing portion through the slit and the take-up unit rolls the restraining member up toward the upper end side of the backrest portion. 7. The occupant protection device according to claim 1, wherein take-up unit is further configured to stop the motor from operating when an end portion of the occupant supporting portion reaches a predetermined height dimension. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHAMS DHANANI whose telephone number is (571)272-6255. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday (out of office every other Friday) - 8:00 am - 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Paul Dickson can be reached on (571) 272-7742. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. SHAMS . DHANANI Examiner Art Unit 3616 /PAUL N DICKSON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3614
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 21, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12584286
Material Handling Machine
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570232
VEHICLE OCCUPANT RESTRAINT SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570117
ECCENTRIC CONTROL-ARM BUSHINGS AND SUSPENSION SYSTEMS USING THEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565266
ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHASSIS PLATFORM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12559174
SPLAYED INSTALLATION OF VEHICLE CORNER MODULES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+7.7%)
1y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 112 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month